Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Weasel Straw strikes again (Pakistani men in Britain see white girls as "easy meat")

Status
Not open for further replies.
The thread as now digressed into a quasi theological debate but, for me was more entertaining when it was muslim pedoes attacking 12 year olds

For anyone who can't be arsed reading 66 pages here's a brief synopsis :

in one corner we had PK basically fighting single handed but with a little support from IC3D Cyberrose hipipol

in the Liberal Left corner we had Team Proper Tidy

One_Stop_Shop

smokedout

Rutita1, (you can rape as many 12 year olds as u like but FFS don't call this one a silly girl U Sexist Bastard )

rover07

DrRingDing


Team Proper Tidy came in with the usual Liberal Left Tactics first they try to ridicule PK's arguments that didn't work PK didn't bite then it was the accusations of Racism ( Well it wouldn't be the Liberal Left without someone being labeled a Racist would it?)

Then FFS PK calls Rutita1 a "Silly Girl" so of course the Sexist card comes out.

And so it went for the next 40 odd pages, There was some classic Irony #1619 page 65 proper tidy states "Some people have claimed that people are shouting racist on this thread to shut down debate - but the only person, afaik, who has been labelled a racist on this thread is pk"

and who the fuck labeled him a racist? :rolleyes:

A well entertaing thread but, It's all gone a little Meh now maybe if PK comes back we can get back on track :)
 
I see Jeff Leigh is another eejit not basing his argument on facts but on gut feelings (i.e. easily twisted base fears) rather than from internal discourse.
 
The holy texts, ideal model and established jurisprudence hang like a ball and chain around the ankle of all reform-minded Muslims.

I have to agree with this. I would also say the same about reform-minded Christians, but the prescriptive nature of the Islamic holy texts makes it doubly true for Islam.

I don't quite agree about Islam 'preexisting those individuals who enter into it', though. The holy texts preexist them, as do the traditions that have made those texts what they are, the traditions that have grown up after Muhammad's death, such as the hajj, etc. But I would resist the idea that it is meaningful to talk about Islam as anything with an independent existence beyond what Muslims do. That said, clearly the holy books say some things but not others, so once you've taken the leap to say that it contains the word of god, of whom Muhammad was a prophet, you are indeed limited by what is actually contained in the scripture.

The same can be said of anyone holding any work to be 'holy' – you've knobbled your ability to think critically right there.
 
I'm going to dip in (excuse the pun) and state that I think there's an endemic problem with people blaming cunts for being cunts because of their skin colour, ethnic origin, religion etc. Nobheads exist all over the shop, up here in Norf Wayels someone tried to pull a girl into his car the other week by her scarf. The car had two lads in, and the girl told the Uni paper she was in no doubt they were trying to sexually assault her. Guess what? They weren't brown! This 'white men see white girls as easy meat' phenomenonenonenon has got to stop! WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!! *insert knee jerk reactionary racist statement here*.
 
Yeah sexual jihad was one of the most classic comments I've seen on here. pk started talking about muslim gangstas getting islamist rhetoric through blue tooth which made them go on a sexual jihad. All very strange.

I worry about the lad to be honest. Not content with sexist rhetoric he then went on to describe sexual assault as "grabbing a bit of arse". I'm all for him defending us all against the sexual jihad but am starting to worry whether the is the man for the job with those kind of remarks.

Also after 67 pages not a single practical suggestion from pk or any of his supporters. Again not very encouraging.
 
I worry about the lad to be honest. Not content with sexist rhetoric he then went on to describe sexual assault as "grabbing a bit of arse".

TBF when PK described sexual assault as "grabbing a bit of arse" He wasn't dismissing sexual assaults as being no big deal, He was talking about how Crime statistics are gathered and how lesser crimes are lumped in with the more serious one's to make up the numbers. Not that I'm suggesting having your arse grabbed if you don't want it grabbed wouldn't be Annoying or Humiliating for the person concerned.
 
TBF when PK described sexual assault as "grabbing a bit of arse" He wasn't dismissing sexual assaults as being no big deal, He was talking about how Crime statistics are gathered and how lesser crimes are lumped in with the more serious one's to make up the numbers. Not that I'm suggesting having your arse grabbed if you don't want it grabbed wouldn't be Annoying or Humiliating for the person concerned.

wow, you know a lot about what he was claiming.

Or, you dont, and are just rather pathetically trying to find a belated justification for his ignorant rantings. Bit fucking sad that, innit?
 
wow, you know a lot about what he was claiming.

Or, you dont, and are just rather pathetically trying to find a belated justification for his ignorant rantings. Bit fucking sad that, innit?

I think it's pretty fucking sad and pathetic to quote people out of context on an internet forum.
 
How can it be 'out of context' when I quoted the entire post immediately after you made it?

You're really not very good at this, are you?
 
This thread sums up the reason I keep looking at Urban.....I fucking love your little spats....this one's good, but not up with the best, however it does have pk (firebomber) and ern (wet stalinist liberal)...keep flying the flag guys :)
 
Something about this on Radio 4 now, pretty much disagreeing with everything I've seen PK say in this thread, with facts to back it even.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom