Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Weasel Straw strikes again (Pakistani men in Britain see white girls as "easy meat")

Status
Not open for further replies.
oh well, if that is the specific topic, we can be pretty sure the percentage of asians involved is 100%


Accidentally given yourself away again, pk

Maybe you are too thick to work out the nuances of the stats involved.

The cop you cited as an example from Newsnight was - according to you - talking about 80 percent of the perps caught grooming kids being white.

I've demonstrated that you're talking complete bollocks. None of those figures that have been cited by Jack Straw, or senior cops in a better position to tally the ethnic background and background of the victims has said anything like this.

In fact quite the opposite.

The Times investigation is based around 56 men convicted in the Midlands and north of England since 1997, 50 were from Muslim backgrounds.

No official data exists on the ethnic or religious background of perpetrators of this form of grooming of children by drug gangs for rape, and local charities such as Engage have stated publicly that they do not consider it a race issue.
 
you didnt really just ask that did you? Jesus! :D

What's Jesus got to do with it? :D

Do you have a point?? Do you disagree, that islam is not as barbaric as... erm... another religion that you just can't be arsed to mention right now?

Up to 80 percent of jailed Pakistani women are inside because they were raped, because the application of islamic law means "they were asking for it" in other words.

But no - it has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on these latest string of abuse cases, almost all involving muslim men and white non-muslim UK children.

None at all.

It must be all in my head.

What's the view like in there?

head-in-the-sand.jpg
 
From Buddhists to Christians via Rastas, Scientologists and every other fucker, some exponents of every religion behave like that. Here, have a starting point, first example of a few thousand you could find if you looked.

Fucks sake - the Lords Resistance Army isn't a religion...
 
oh well, if that is the specific topic, we can be pretty sure the percentage of asians involved is 100%

What have the last 39 pages been discussing, if not the specific topic of grooming children for rape?? Twat.
 
That would include uncles and care homes and all manner of nasty incest shit.

The topic we are discussing is the grooming and of children by asians to facilitate gang rape. Not overall child abuses.

As you well know.

Oh it's about all Asians now?...you see I thought you said it was:

pk said:
In the meantime I'll maintain my own stance - that the STREET GROOMING OF CHILDREN FOR RAPE IS DISPROPORTIONATELY CARRIED OUT BY MUSLIM MEN.

Make up your mind...you are posting in circles and it's tedious.
 
Fucks sake - the Lords Resistance Army isn't a religion...

Why?

Why is it Islam's fault when repressive regimes call themselves Islamic, but it isn't Christianity's fault when repressive regimes call themselves Christian? Why, pk, why?

Does the existence of violent secular organisations prove that secularism is inherently violent?
 
Your words not mine, funny how the racism comes out in jest...

Ya see that's the thing pk...it isn't funny, nobody is laughing except for you.

There is an underlying narrative to this in the way it's being reported, the 'defiling of indigenious youth by evil foreigners'. You are also buying into that and exploiting it to blame this gang's behaviour on the fact that they come from a non-indigenous, Muslim background, despite the things they were doing to these girls and the lifestyle they were living, not being 'Muslim' in lifestyle, and considerably, 'Western' in activity. Fast cars, drugs, sex, gangs...
 
Why?

Why is it Islam's fault when repressive regimes call themselves Islamic, but it isn't Christianity's fault when repressive regimes call themselves Christian? Why, pk, why?

Does the existence of violent secular organisations prove that secularism is inherently violent?

That.
 
Could I mentıon that the greatest atrocıtıes ın hıstory have been carrıed out by avowedly secularıst regımes?

Ta.
 
As an aside....does anyone know how to do that post count by users on a thread?...I would like to see the stats for this thread...I think it might make me laugh a little. :D
 
As an aside....does anyone know how to do that post count by users on a thread?...I would like to see the stats for this thread...I think it might make me laugh a little. :D

Posts 275 pk
Posts 77 DrRingDing
Posts 66 smokedout
Posts 56 ernestolynch
Posts 47 Proper Tidy
Posts 42 One_Stop_Shop
Posts 37 Rutita1
Posts 26 ViolentPanda
Posts 25 phildwyer
Posts 23 IC3D
Posts 19 nino_savatte
Posts 17 Pickman's model
Posts 17 rover07
Posts 15 Fullyplumped
Posts 15 littlebabyjesus
Posts 15 ericjarvis
Posts 14 _angel_
Posts 13 IMR
Posts 12 CyberRose
Posts 11 dylans
Posts 11 The39thStep
Posts 10 YouSir
Posts 9 frogwoman
Posts 9 Garek
Posts 9 tbaldwin
Posts 7 hipipol
Posts 7 Citizen66
Posts 6 butchersapron
Posts 6 likesfish
Posts 5 belboid
Posts 5 Kid_Eternity
Posts 5 classicdish
Posts 5 revol68
Posts 5 Captain Hurrah
Posts 5 treelover
 
Ya see that's the thing pk...it isn't funny, nobody is laughing except for you.

There is an underlying narrative to this in the way it's being reported, the 'defiling of indigenious youth by evil foreigners'. You are also buying into that and exploiting it to blame this gang's behaviour on the fact that they come from a non-indigenous, Muslim background, despite the things they were doing to these girls and the lifestyle they were living, not being 'Muslim' in lifestyle, and considerably, if not more secular and 'Western' in activity. Fast cars, drugs, sex, gangs...

For starters - they're not "foreigners" mostly they are second generation British.

But they often carry with them the notion that western women are just kuffar sluts, not to be respected in the same way as muslim girls.

And the notion that underage girls are fair game, another nasty trait from their grandfather's homeland.

You clearly think this has no bearing on the recent spate of cases, and perhaps you have no opinion on the fact that such stories have seemingly been repressed by the news media for a decade until now... why do you think that is?
 
For starters - they're not "foreigners" mostly they are second generation British.

I know! :facepalm:

But by repeatedly referring to them as Asian/Muslim and going on like their behaviour is inherent to them being Asian/Muslim is exploiting and supporting/promoting an underlying narrative, about the 'defiling of indigenious youth by evil foreigners' and ignoring the fact that the things they were doing to these girls and the lifestyle they were living, was not particularly 'Muslim' in lifestyle, and considerably, if not 'Western' in activity. Fast cars, drugs, sex, gangs...
 
But they often carry with them the notion that western women are just kuffar sluts, not to be respected in the same way as muslim girls.

Blind assertion part 1

And the notion that underage girls are fair game, another nasty trait from their grandfather's homeland.

Blind assertion part 2

You clearly think this has no bearing on the recent spate of cases, and perhaps you have no opinion on the fact that such stories have seemingly been repressed by the news media for a decade until now... why do you think that is?

Blind assertion part 3
 
Why?

Why is it Islam's fault when repressive regimes call themselves Islamic, but it isn't Christianity's fault when repressive regimes call themselves Christian? Why, pk, why?

Does the existence of violent secular organisations prove that secularism is inherently violent?

Your consistent wriggling to avoid answering your own questions isn't going unnoticed...

But the Lords Army aren't anything to do with Christianity - Thou Shalt Not Kill being one of the central tenets.

Neither is the US Army. They aren't converting people to Christianity or building churches.

Irrelevant point is irrelevant.

The duty of a devout muslim is to propagate islam, and to convert as many people as possible or just disregard them as sinful infidels.
 
Your consistent wriggling to avoid answering your own questions isn't going unnoticed...

But the Lords Army aren't anything to do with Christianity - Thou Shalt Not Kill being one of the central tenets.

Neither is the US Army. They aren't converting people to Christianity or building churches.

Irrelevant point is irrelevant.

The duty of a devout muslim is to propagate islam, and to convert as many people as possible or just disregard them as sinful infidels.

Ahahahahaha
 
Your consistent wriggling to avoid answering your own questions isn't going unnoticed...

But the Lords Army aren't anything to do with Christianity - Thou Shalt Not Kill being one of the central tenets.

Neither is the US Army. They aren't converting people to Christianity or building churches.

Irrelevant point is irrelevant.

The duty of a devout muslim is to propagate islam, and to convert as many people as possible or just disregard them as sinful infidels.
LOLpost of the thread so far. I love how the LRA is nothing to do with Xtianity, and how the US isn't either, but some waster nonces who happen to be 2nd gen pakistani represent islam.
 
Nobody has commented on the racial abuse these children suffered along with the rapes...

Seems to me a lot of people keen to derail the thread rather than talk about this stuff...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom