Weasel Straw strikes again (Pakistani men in Britain see white girls as "easy meat")

[YouSir]

Your consistent wriggling to avoid answering your own questions isn't going unnoticed...

But the Lords Army aren't anything to do with Christianity - Thou Shalt Not Kill being one of the central tenets.

Neither is the US Army. They aren't converting people to Christianity or building churches.

Irrelevant point is irrelevant.

The duty of a devout muslim is to propagate islam, and to convert as many people as possible or just disregard them as sinful infidels.

 

[Proper Tidy]

Lords Army - nothing to do with the Lord. Fact.

 

[Treacle Toes]

Nobody has commented on the racial abuse these children suffered along with the rapes...

I did. You ignored it because you had nothing you could counter it with.

 

[pk]

Lords Army - nothing to do with the Lord. Fact.

About as much as Lord's Cricket Ground...

 

[belboid]

Maybe you are too thick to work out the nuances of the stats involved.

maybe you're too thick to realsie what you wrote?

You are contradicting yourself all over the place, showing such obvious hypocrisy it is unbelievable, but at least you have a glorious ally - that goold old fashioned non-bigot Lock&Light! marvellous.

One moment you accept that muslim are under repsresented amongst overall child abuse, and then go on to say they are the most abhorrent religion because of (amongst other things) they're child abuse!

Oh what a mess you are.

 

[pk]

I did. You ignored it because you had nothing you could counter it with.

I've ignored nothing. Remind me. Fast moving thread is fast. If you wouldn't mind.

 

[belboid]

the Lords Army aren't anything to do with Christianity - Thou Shalt Not Kill being one of the central tenets.

you are fucking joking arent you? You are truly, truly mad.

pk just denies that any christian denomination is christian.

 

[YouSir]

Just to be clear, PK, what grounds do you judge a religion on? Who represents it? You won't accept that cunts using Christianity to justify their actions have anything to do with Christianity, so why does the reverse apply to Muslims?

 

[pk]

maybe you're too thick to realsie what you wrote?

You are contradicting yourself all over the place, showing such obvious hypocrisy it is unbelievable, but at least you have a glorious ally - that goold old fashioned non-bigot Lock&Light! marvellous.

One moment you accept that muslim are under repsresented amongst overall child abuse, and then go on to say they are the most abhorrent religion because of (amongst other things) they're child abuse!

Oh what a mess you are.

You're desperation to misrepresent my opinions is hysterical.

Overall child abuse in an overwhelmingly white majority is majority white. As Straw said regarding prison stats.

Specific grooming of children for gang rape is overwhelmingly muslim.

Do you agree? Yes or no will be fine.

 

[Spion]

Specific grooming of children for gang rape is overwhelmingly muslim.

And the evidence for this is?

 

[pk]

Just to be clear, PK, what grounds do you judge a religion on? Who represents it? You won't accept that cunts using Christianity to justify their actions have anything to do with Christianity, so why does the reverse apply to Muslims?

Lord's Army are about as representative of mainstream christianity as Jim Jones and the Kool Aid gang.

Need I clarify that any example of a mainstream religion will suffice as an example of one more barbaric than islam.

 

[pk]

And the evidence for this is?

Read the fucking thread and find out?

 

[belboid]

You're desperation to misrepresent my opinions is hysterical.

Overall child abuse in an overwhelmingly white majority is majority white. As Straw said regarding prison stats.

And you argued that child abuse (and surely raping a child in a childrens home, pimping them out from there, is every bit as bad as grooming for gang rape?) is a major reasobn islam is especuially evil. Even tho figures show it isn't.

Specific grooming of children for gang rape is overwhelmingly muslim.

Do you agree? Yes or no will be fine.

I have seen absolutely zero evidence to support that argument, no.

What you are trying, very very badly, to do, is to use one single crime that you think (without any real evidence) is 'overwhemlingly' carried out by a single group, and using that to extrapolate absurdly, wilfully ignoring that overall (even if your claim is true) the evidence points clearly in the opposite direction.

It's a very old, lazy, and racist argument that we've heard time and time again.

 

[Treacle Toes]

I've ignored nothing. Remind me. Fast moving thread is fast. If you wouldn't mind.

Okay.

Nice of you to skip over the main point of that quote... namely that there was DEFINITELY a racial element to the rapes.

Given that in my experience, a seeming anti-racist will resort to calling people racially inspired names if there are in a temper or that so called anti-mysogynists will also resort to calling women 'silly girls' when it takes their fancy, I don't think I skipped an important point at all.

Rape is a dehumaninsing and violent crime. That racialised language/epitaphs were used to enforce that dehumanisation and distancing between victim and perpetrator is no surprise to me.

 

[YouSir]

Lord's Army are about as representative of mainstream christianity as Jim Jones and the Kool Aid gang.

Need I clarify that any example of a mainstream religion will suffice as an example of one more barbaric than islam.

So you think that gang raping kids is a bulwark of mainstream Islamic belief then?

 

[belboid]

Lord's Army are about as representative of mainstream christianity as Jim Jones and the Kool Aid gang.

Need I clarify that any example of a mainstream religion will suffice as an example of one more barbaric than islam.

oh do fuck off.

None of the islamic groups that do nasty things are really islamic because the koran is nice.

Unless pk says otherwise.

 

[pk]

Blind assertion part 1

Blind assertion part 2

Blind assertion part 3

I've provided enough data to back up what I said.

The fact that you're refusing to accept it is not my problem.

 

[belboid]

Read the fucking thread and find out?

we have. you have none.

 

[belboid]

I've provided enough data to back up what I said.

No you havent.

 

[pk]

So you think that gang raping kids is a bulwark of mainstream Islamic belief then?

Seems to be a common trait in cities all over Europe. Bulwark of mainstream belief? If you follow the example of the prophet to the letter then I guess it could be considered so. As is the subjugation of women in general.

 

[Spion]

Read the fucking thread and find out?

The thread is not evidence. I expect an expert like yourself to have such evidence to hand. It should be easy for you to provide the evidence for your assertion that: "Specific grooming of children for gang rape is overwhelmingly muslim". So let's see it

 

[pk]

we have. you have none.

I have plenty. Read it again. Use a bigger font if you need to.

 

[Proper Tidy]

Just to be clear, PK, what grounds do you judge a religion on? Who represents it? You won't accept that cunts using Christianity to justify their actions have anything to do with Christianity, so why does the reverse apply to Muslims?

I've already asked this. Apparently it's 'irrelevant'.

Can we just accept that pk isn't naive, neither is he the brave bringer of truth in a world of newspeak. He's just a bigoted little twat.

 

[pk]

What you are trying, very very badly, to do, is to use one single crime that you think (without any real evidence) is 'overwhemlingly' carried out by a single group

Rubbish - there are at least 4 crimes that are identical yet unrelated, and plenty more in Europe that I've sourced and provided.

Enlarge that font, maybe you're needing glasses?

 

[Lock&Light]

So you think that gang raping kids is a bulwark of mainstream Islamic belief then?

That's not what pk has said. But I think you know that.

 

[Proper Tidy]

Lord's Army are about as representative of mainstream christianity as Jim Jones and the Kool Aid gang.

Need I clarify that any example of a mainstream religion will suffice as an example of one more barbaric than islam.

So you think a majority of muslims agree that rape and noncing is acceptable, thus making it 'mainstream islam'?

 

[Treacle Toes]

Rubbish - there are at least 4 crimes that are identical yet unrelated, and plenty more in Europe that I've sourced and provided.

Okay pk...you are obviously right.

Now, you know all the White men in the world that are involved in child abuse/rape etc....Do they also do it because they have a Muslim heritage?

Or is it only Muslim men that do it because they are Muslim, but non-muslims do it because they want to be Muslim?

 

[Proper Tidy]

I've provided enough data to back up what I said.

The fact that you're refusing to accept it is not my problem.

You haven't provided any that would back up your repeated and racist assertions.

 

[belboid]

Rubbish - there are at least 4 crimes that are identical yet unrelated, and plenty more in Europe that I've sourced and provided.

Enlarge that font, maybe you're needing glasses?

wow, a grand total of four examples of the same crime! (learn how to use words properly pk, it might help you stop making a dick of yourself). Four is a number any statistician will tell you is meaningless to draw conclusions from. Worthless. Even if it was a properly controled sample of four, which, of course, it isn't.

 

[belboid]

That's not what pk has said. But I think you know that.

He's just said exactly that, dumbo.