Level one FA coaching badge is the culinary equivalent to learning how to make a slice of toast. Most coaches in this country are level one. Level two is like adding beans to the toast.
Totally agree with your basic position, but imo the FA Level 1 badge is not just bad because it is simple to the point of idiocy but because it contains exercises which are actually literally going to make young players worse. I had a personal epiphany while coaching a group using an exercise from the Level 1 handbook called "Robin Hood" and I realised that I was spending more time and energy stopping the kids queuing up from messing about with some loose footballs (and the queuing kids were 7 out of 8 of them at any one moment - i.e. 7/8 of them are
just standing still, watching at any one time) than I was spending time on actually improving anyones' technique. I heard myself continually shouting "Leave that football alone!" - it would have been better if there had been no one coaching and they had just been left to mess around with the kit on their own - at least they'd have got some decent time on the ball and been practising feeling comfortable with that.
"Leave that football alone!" - is now my personal motto for FA-inspired coaching in England and with the help of it I have managed to completely wean myself off their ideas for coaching children.
What I would disagree with is your characterisation of Level 2 as "adding beans" to the toast of Level 1. I think the Level 2 is a decent enough course as it stands and imo most would-be coaches will learn a lot of interesting stuff doing that course, including technical breakdowns of certain skills which I certainly wish I had known as a player. The problem with the L2 imo is that it is completely non-applicable to children, you'd have to be working with at least young teenagers to be able to apply any of the L2 learning. So we're left with a L1 which is simplistic to the point of idiocy (and so badly thought out that it will turn youngsters off and de-skill them) followed by a L2 which is basically for grown ups. So between the ages of ?3/?4/whenever you start trying to influence young players up to teenage years (i.e. exactly the age group which the overwhelming majority coaches will be working with) there is basically absolutely nothing useful from the FA.
Personally I now always start with every child with a ball at their feet for at least the first 15 minutes of any session, often more. If it does nothing else it temporarily sates their need for ball-time and thus makes them less fidgety and more attentive later, but it also means that ALL of them get to be comfortable with the ball at their feet, not just those who happen to be "good" when they are 5 and then monopolise the ball in their playing groups for the next 15 years. I think psychologically it also means that there is a message being sent from the coaches that says "you are here to learn how to use the football".
I have seen so many coaching sessions at so many football clubs start off with youngsters being sent off to do (pretty pointless) things like running round the pitch for 10 minutes as a "warm-up" right at the beginning and I always think, fucksake, why not at least give them a ball and tell them to
dribble round the pitch, at least they'd get be getting some ball time - but what's actually going on is that they are "learning" to think of football as a macho, army-style initiation rite into contemporary British masculinity. What bullshit.