Can you post a link to that? Im on phone and it's hardApparently the Kinks first album was 64 as well.
Can you post a link to that? Im on phone and it's hard
Released | 4 December 1964 |
---|---|
Recorded | 20 March 1964 |
Venue | Marquee Club, London |
quite a common thing in dancehallKind of interesting seeing the way that people were playing around with the album format in 1964, like I guess you can disqualify this for being a compilation but it seems like an idea not many people have tried doing since?
View attachment 427739
View attachment 427740
I reckon Kendrick and Drake are missing a trick by not putting something like this out, come to think of it.
ta...that reminds me of a friend recently recommending me Five Live Yardbirds as a great early protopunk album....just looked and by luck its 1964.... I had a feeling it was around this time
Released 4 December 1964 Recorded 20 March 1964 Venue Marquee Club, London
"The Yardbirds were a popular live attraction at music clubs. Much of their reputation was built on their use of a "rave up" musical arrangement, an instrumental interlude that builds to a climax. Clapton credits the rave up to bassist Paul Samwell-Smith and explains: "While most other bands were playing three-minute songs, we were taking three-minute numbers and stretching them out to five or six minutes, during which time the audience would go crazy".[5] It was at such performances that Clapton often broke a guitar string. While he was putting on a new one, the audience would slowly clap their hands (slow handclapping). This led manager Gomelsky to nickname him "Eric 'Slowhand' Clapton"."
Its definitely got a punk rawness to it...covers of RnB tracks but done in a very lose and distorted style
Its a bit of a rarity in that : "the album did not appear in British record charts. Subsequently, it was not issued in the US, but in November 1965 Epic Records (their American label) included four of the tracks on Having a Rave Up with the Yardbirds. In 1966, Epic planned to release the album in the US with the same tracks as the UK album (although with different cover art), but did not follow through."
I think its pretty special
what are the other two?one of the three truly great debut albums that were live in concert
Oh yeah, now I come to think of it I suppose split EPs are a very grind thing too. Wasn't expecting to find myself thinking about Agathocles on the 1964 thread but I reckon Agathocles must hold the record for most split releases by a very long chalk.quite a common thing in dancehall
this might make my list in 1994 - Bounty Killer v Beenie Man - one side each
MC5 & Husker Duwhat are the other two?
and...Solid, flat, clear pressing! Minimal noise, and a pretty crisp soundstage without being “crispy”. Bass is punchy without being flabby, drums cut through without overpowering, piano moves front & center during solos. Horns & snare are a little bit hard right, but that was RVG’s stylistic choice at the time
to which someone replied:No flaws whatsoever. Flat and centered. The mastering is great, but I think it leaves a little something to be desired - a bit more life or something? It's hard to put my finger on it. I don't hate it, but it sounds a tad clinical. I have no other pressings to compare it to.
That said, it is a really excellent pressing and mastering job and I do recommend this.
Fluance RT80
AT-VM95ML
Schiit Mani 2
Edifier R1700BT
Could it be your low fi setup? Just a thought
Is Miles & Monk at Newport a compilation?
Side 1 is Davis from 1958, the only (then) legitimate live recording of the Kind of Blue band. It's pretty darned groovy.
Side 2 is Thelonious from 1963 and is perfectly decent. They never actually play together altho Miles does do a Monk tune.
I'm not sure if it would make a top 10 or 20 for me anyway, but I can't help but wonder...
the one aspect of all that waffle that gets a pass from me is that you might have an old mono original, followed by a heavily panned 90s remaster, or something similarly drastic, and its fair enough to point that out....and while some remastering is done from original tapes you do also get later releases where someone has taken a rare record, digitised it, and basically just played with an eq and compression to "remaster" it...Reading the Discogs reviews for different pressings of old jazz records, where the audiophiles write like they're What HiFi reviwers, cracks me up
and...
to which someone replied:
I think the last from me. I don't really think that much of the Beatles, however everything sounds better chipmunked up
This is really great ... I think i said this already on the Wayne Shorter RIP thread but the thing with has classic 60s albums is that the main theme/melodies are always brilliant, really memorable, but the tracks almost all have the same Theme>Everyone Solos>Theme again arrangement, which gets a bit boring I find. Luckily the Themes are always excellent but I much prefer when the arrangements go somewhere (like that Donald Byrd New Perspectives...thats much more creative). Black Nile from this album is a fav.Oh, that was for this, btw, which sounds great but it's too late listen to now.
Hadnt heard of this before but its really hit the spot for me....i think a special and unique album.....
Blue Note have marketed it all wrong though, the title and particularly the cover art dont suit the music at all, though perhaps Donald came up with the title and they just went with the perspective thing, but it couldnt be further away from being about a man and a sport car. Almost offensively wrong tbh!
It's based on spirituals, with a choir, given the jazz treatment, but nothing too hard or freewheeling... great arrangements, strong grooving, very listenable, politically charged, ambitious, a lot of heart and soul has gone into it.....I think its great... wonderful playing across the whole band (inc. sax Hank Mobley, guitar Kenny Burrell, piano Herbie Hancock). A real start to finish album....its a suite really.