Idris2002
canadian girlfriend
Absolutely brilliant, spot on.
Yep, Mrs. Booth's boy hit that one straight outta the park.
Absolutely brilliant, spot on.
I was anti-Zionist before Theodor Herzl came up with secular Zionism.
LP: I attended two talks last year at which I was told by older white men in left academic circles that feminism was either irrelevant to class struggle or actively its enemy.
@PennyRed
This macro of one of my quotes is great. 'youth power's equivalent of the v-sign is the camera phone held aloft'
Laurie Penny: How is listening to a panel like this, with four white males telling us things we already largely know, helpful to us in overcoming the crisis? Why was nothing mentioned about rights, gender, or the family? Why were these treated as side issues?
One of these two talks consisted of a debate between David Harvey, Paul Mattick Jr., Loren Goldner, and Andrew Kliman. A video is online of the incident. Penny insults them by proclaiming to be "fans of [their] work" (it doesnt fucking show) and then asks why they didnt mention women in their talks. None of them responded by saying "feminism was either irrelevant to class struggle or actively its enemy".
LP: I attended two talks last year at which I was told by older white men in left academic circles that feminism was either irrelevant to class struggle or actively its enemy.
LG: I am really sorry that I was born a white male and spent 40 years studying capitalist crisis. I think the question of the disappearance of the one-paycheck family — though I am no fan of the bourgeois nuclear family — is one key aspect of the contraction of social reproduction. This can lead to a fruitful discussion of some gender issues.
If one looks over a 200-year period — from the very labor-intensive capitalism that existed in the early 19th century to today — there is no question that there has been a long-term trend towards the rise of constant capital and the diminution of variable capital, albeit with a lot of fluctuations along the way. The credit system was necessary to uphold the value of different claims to wealth well past the time they otherwise would have collapsed due to lack of profit. The goal of socialism is, as Andrew said, the abolition of value, the destruction of the regulation of social production by socially necessary labor time.
PM: Participating on a panel like this is not a radical activity. It does not change the world. It does not undermine anything. As a group we are interested in the subject, but I see no reason to describe that as a radical or revolutionary activity. I generally refuse to be on a discussion that does not include at least one female. This time I would have refused, but, the truth is, I deal with a lot of the crisis literature, but I don’t know any women who are writing about the subject. I would say that issues of race and gender, while of importance or interest politically, are quite irrelevant to the question of the nature of the world economic downturn. They have no bearing on it. This is an extremely, highly abstract feature of capitalism. If you had total gender equality and total racial equality in every nation in the world, you would still have economic depressions. If we would begin to talk about political responses to the existing economic situation, then we would have to start talking about gender, race, nationality, and many other social categories. I think it has to be faced, as a sociological fact, that Marxist theory is a male business, like ham radio operators or tropical fish keeping. It’s a hobby for white males. There is a history behind that sociological fact.
AK: I would also have liked a more representative panel. But, on the question of planning: If you are going to overcome the law of value, you have to have planning and at some level it will have to be centralized, for practical reasons. To have a world economy, it has to be coordinated. It doesn’t have to be coordinated by bureaucracy in an oppressive manner. Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel have done really good work about how you can have, in a sense, central planning, without anybody being controlled.
I'm glad she took those misogynists to task though. Harvey has gotten away for far too long with sexist tracts like The Limits to Capital for Men and The Enigma of Male Capital and the Male Crises of Capitalism
On what grounds does Tory cunt and cheese-thief Anthony Worral-Thompson get to spout his reactionary shite on Question Time?
It sounds hideous - Ken Clarke, Harriet Harman, Shirley Williams, Laurie Pennie and that beardy twat.
"It's a most peculiar costume for people to adopt in the 21st century."
"Social mobility". Why the fuck should anyone have to 'move' socially just to have a crack at a decent life?
"Social mobility". Why the fuck should anyone have to 'move' socially just to have a crack at a decent life?
speech finishes with a Dr King quote as well.
heres the lot
http://www.newstatesman.com/politic...eech-race-class-and-social-mobility-full-text
Investment in education, re-open sure starts, the gains we made in power are being rolled back etc etc I've got my eye on a cabinet position within the next five years etc
We want to create a society in which the son of a bus driver can go on not only to run but own the bus company.
the very first sentence makes me want to puke:The very first sentence makes me want to stop.
stomach-churningAs ever, it’s great to be back here at Herbert Smith.
why not? we've tried a grocer's daughter. can't be much worse."Wouldn't it be ace if the daughter of a greengrocer could go on to not only run but own the country."
why not? we've tried a grocer's daughter. can't be much worse.
yeh you prefer to feed money to multinationals than to help a local business.Grocer, greengrocer, candlestick maker; all the same unless you were born in the 1950s. I go to a supermarket, Pickman. You old codger.
yeh you prefer to feed money to multinationals than to help a local business.
Laurie Penny and Richard Seymour on Brand, Manarchism and Brocialism
http://www.newstatesman.com/laurie-...-brand-iconoclasm-and-womans-place-revolution
Touche mon capitan, as they say on Star Trek. I admit it, I'm a corporatist collaborator.
I shouldn't read the NS site. Just managed to enjoy Chuka 'man who would be king' Umma doing labour apologetics in a speech on class, race and social mobility. Shameful shit.
The very first sentence makes me want to stop.
I'd rather a society where the bus company is owned by everyone, thanks. Also, "son of a bus driver"? Nu Labour, the saviour of Hardworking People as epitomised by such folk as [insert lazy, romanticised placeholder of the salt-of-the-earth, flat-cap wearing proletarian. "Yes Guvna, right you are Sir, up the apple and pears, on the old dog 'n bone, etc"]. Let's have some imagination at least, Chuka.
this thread is like watching you all jizz on biscuits then gobble 'em all up.
ugh.