Acceptable?UKIP has just become one of those long line of acceptable safe protest votes.
Acceptable?
But yes, you have a point. There are clearly people who find it acceptable. Any point trying to engage with them? Are there even any points of contact?
A guy at work always used to blame the traffic jams on the M62 on immigrants, exactly the same 'this country's too crowded' line. He pissed off to Australia about five years ago, probably still spouting the same crap without any awareness of the hypocrisy in his new situation.
I used to work with a bloke who emigrated to Australia on the basis that there had been a massive shift in the balance of power and culture in England and that new arrivals were pushing the native people out to the fringes.
I don't really see UKIPs position on immigration that much different than Labours or the Tories.
It's very different: UKIP want control of immigration from within the EU; the Tories and Labour accept EU immigration as part of being in Europe.
allegations relating to candidate selection.
The only difference seems to be UKIP wants everyone under the same rules.
UKIP has just become one of those long line of acceptable safe protest votes.
They have zero chance of getting in so people vote for them.
The problem is the three major parties confuse what people are pissed off about in politics. It's less about johnny foreigner and more about the absolute lack of any actual representation.
I remember when if you have a problem with you local police, schools, roads, planning or environment you use to be able to visit your local councillor safe in the knowledge that they knew if a few hundred people locally became cheesed off with the issue they'd vote them out next time around. That's not to say they actually fixed anything but there was actual engagement with local politics. Now they have so little power I have to wonder why they just don't scrap them.
I'd be surprised if the majority of people who vote for UKIP think Nigel can make the buses run on time, or indeed would like to see him power. Most just detest the other three parties so much they are happy to kick them in the balls.
The main difference under UKIP is that he will be able to ship over Bangladeshis on £1 an hour instead of using EU labour on minimum wage.
That's your second worst yet. I feel like i'm covered in shit just by reading it. You clueless cunt.
I guess not eh Fingers ?Anything happen off that def true story bigger than rotherham last time?
That's your second worst yet. I feel like i'm covered in shit just by reading it. You clueless cunt.
Real libertarians don’t have a problem with migration and probably wouldn’t want to double prison spaces.
Yes they would. Assuming we're talking of the ayn rand variety...
I think you've lost the plot on this subject. This is a party one of whose two MPs openly spoke of 'sending them back', and you are sickened by a lampoon of such people as narrow-minded racists?That's your second worst yet. I feel like i'm covered in shit just by reading it. You clueless cunt.
Ah the liberal's liberal who is really a hardcore anarchist who thinks being anti-eu is a VOTE FOR WAR!!!! and also you hate black people and all that because i know some damn well black people and they don't vote UKIP.I think you've lost the plot on this subject. This is a party one of whose two MPs openly spoke of 'sending them back', and you are sickened by a lampoon of such people as narrow-minded racists?
It might hit a few bum notes, but you know what I felt covered in shit by? You, hoping people would vote UKIP before a recent election. You've no business calling anyone a clueless cunt when it comes to this.