Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UK courtroom to hear evidence against the official narrative of 9/11

Tell us about a strategy of tension - what sort of scenarios do these things appear under. Are these realistic scenarios for the US right now?

They're not pick and mix you know. Insulting post-modernist loonery.

A prime wibbler on SoT is Peter Dale Scott. I'd point you in his direction without commenting on how seriously I take what he says.

Would I have to comment? Don't you know what I think, and what everyone else thinks about what I think don't you Madame Butch? Your mind is like the Akash. What number was I thinking of? What colour? What are CCFCs stats for next season?

Or is that you only ask the questions and never bother answering?

It's fine for you to challenge what you think is absurd in other posters stuff. But when you dodge your own larger absurdities you look even more daft in the context of your know-all arrogance.

Happy Tuesday.
 
Molly and the crabapples are coming! No, there's nothing here that stands historical or critical scrutiny. Look how nimbly he leaps though from, i'm not saying it was a conspiracy to saying it was a conspiracy involving the whole of western europe, NATO, the middle east and the entire post-war years.

Look how nimbly you concocted such drivel from : "It doesn't look enough like to conspiracy to me" followed by "but conspiracies do happen".

That doesn't mean allying the first to the second. Since being on this thread I've been clear that conspiracies happen, but to assume incident X is a conspiracy in the first instance is daft.

You are either remarkably stupid or wantonly twisting words in a way that ought to be beneath you, and is certainly not worthy of engagement.

I don't think you are stupid. Yet I often wonder if I had too high an opinion of you. Yours is a good brain wasted mostly on posturing high-minded tripe in a rather naff bullying style. It's utterly needless. Why are you so bitter and sarcastic? Is it you who is truly the misanthrope?

Please stop putting words in my mouth. Thank you.
 
I certainly didn't endorse it. This is the kind of clarification that gets tiresome.
No, because unlike switching planes, killing the passengers, making phone calls to relatives with a crack team of impersonators, attaching missiles to the new planes and rigging the towers with an explosive that's never used for controlled demolition, holographic planes are a bit far fetched.
 
No, because unlike switching planes, killing the passengers, making phone calls to relatives with a crack team of impersonators, attaching missiles to the new planes and rigging the towers with an explosive that's never used for controlled demolition, holographic planes are a bit far fetched.

Kapow.

Turn it in jazzz
 
He won't be. It's 10+ years now. He just won't be. And he knows why, once he does it's over - he is over. He's more fragile than he lets on.
This. Jazzz's entire world outlook is built on an interconnected web of conspiracy bullshit. To admit he might be wrong on this is to admit he's wrong about everything, from how he thinks all the way to the shit he's put (or not put in the case of vaccinations) into his body.
 
A prime wibbler on SoT is Peter Dale Scott. I'd point you in his direction without commenting on how seriously I take what he says.

Would I have to comment? Don't you know what I think, and what everyone else thinks about what I think don't you Madame Butch? Your mind is like the Akash. What number was I thinking of? What colour? What are CCFCs stats for next season?

Or is that you only ask the questions and never bother answering?

It's fine for you to challenge what you think is absurd in other posters stuff. But when you dodge your own larger absurdities you look even more daft in the context of your know-all arrogance.

Happy Tuesday.
Why are you calling him Madame Butch?

Are you trying to undermine him by implying he is a woman? What's wrong with being a woman? Or are you questioning his sexuality?
 
Look how nimbly you concocted such drivel from : "It doesn't look enough like to conspiracy to me" followed by "but conspiracies do happen".

That doesn't mean allying the first to the second. Since being on this thread I've been clear that conspiracies happen, but to assume incident X is a conspiracy in the first instance is daft.

You are either remarkably stupid or wantonly twisting words in a way that ought to be beneath you, and is certainly not worthy of engagement.

I don't think you are stupid. Yet I often wonder if I had too high an opinion of you. Yours is a good brain wasted mostly on posturing high-minded tripe in a rather naff bullying style. It's utterly needless. Why are you so bitter and sarcastic? Is it you who is truly the misanthrope?

Please stop putting words in my mouth. Thank you.
I like the way that you've substituted yourself for humanity here. If he's having a pop at me he must hate all humanity given my Christlike standing :D

Seriously, saying that you are yet to openly say that something is a conspiracy is not a defence from a long career/record of saying that things are conspiracies and being held firmly in the grip of the conspiracy mindset. See for example your immediate pulling in of vast historical conspiracy theories to relate to the boston bombs and fall out. Classic example of those ideas having you rather than you having those ideas.


(Few bits of free advice, lay off the skunk, go to bed nice and early, stop whining).
 
A prime wibbler on SoT is Peter Dale Scott. I'd point you in his direction without commenting on how seriously I take what he says.

Would I have to comment? Don't you know what I think, and what everyone else thinks about what I think don't you Madame Butch? Your mind is like the Akash. What number was I thinking of? What colour? What are CCFCs stats for next season?

Or is that you only ask the questions and never bother answering?

It's fine for you to challenge what you think is absurd in other posters stuff. But when you dodge your own larger absurdities you look even more daft in the context of your know-all arrogance.

Happy Tuesday.
I know the strategy of tension inside out thanks, i was trying to see if you did given how quickly you attempted to use it in relation to boston. Sihhi has pointed out a few large gaps in your understanding and posed a few pertinent questions in the meantime. This person who you've directed me to appears to say nothing whatsoever about italy in the 60s and 70s. Why have i been offered him?
 
I like the way that you've substituted yourself for humanity here. If he's having a pop at me he must hate all humanity given my Christlike standing :D

Seriously, saying that you are yet to openly say that something is a conspiracy is not a defence from a long career/record of saying that things are conspiracies and being held firmly in the grip of the conspiracy mindset. See for example your immediate pulling in of vast historical conspiracy theories to relate to the boston bombs and fall out. Classic example of those ideas having you rather than you having those ideas.


(Few bits of free advice, lay off the skunk, go to bed nice and early, stop whining).

The only "Christlike standing" most CTers should have is the "standing on a nail that's been driven through their feet as they're crucified.
 
The only "Christlike standing" most CTers should have is the "standing on a nail that's been driven through their feet as they're crucified.

no they shouldn't. could you imagine how they'd get? "see how they're persecuting me - just like they did to jesus!" :D
 
there was an interesting article in, i think, international journal of intelligence and counterintelligence some years ago about whether st paul was a roman intelligence agent and the foundation of the xian church was some sort of roman intelligence operation.
Damascene conversion by waterboarding.
 
Back
Top Bottom