UK courtroom to hear evidence against the official narrative of 9/11
- Thread starter Jazzz
- Start date
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Something thickens each time that you post. That's clear.
Zapp Brannigan
Built like a steakhouse, handles like a bistro
Jazzz, Do you ever read people's replies to your posts or any other discussion in these threads? From where i'm sat you just seem to lob Hand Grenades of Truth in then carry on your lunatic way with nary a thought for what anyone else has to say.
Doubt you'll even read this. Fish umbrella gibbon pants. Llama crustacean. Yeah? Reply with the codeword* if you've got this far.
*ostrich
Doubt you'll even read this. Fish umbrella gibbon pants. Llama crustacean. Yeah? Reply with the codeword* if you've got this far.
*ostrich
Any chance you could answer Butchersapron's post #1125 rather than posting comment free links to conspiracy websites in breach of the FAQ's?
I have previously announced that I find discussion with butchersapron unproductive and would advise others to do the same.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
This press conference is now open
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
That's two posters who have now advised people not to talk to me - ayatollah suggested that i (and, for some reason, joe elliot) are touts and jazzz thinks i ask questions he can't answer.
In that case, why do you think the person (Nevada State governor -candidate-) in the video you posted is advancing a credible argument? What parts do you find convincing and what evidence did he use to reach those conclusions that you both agree with?
What method of evaluation did you both use to gain this evidence?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Announce that you find discussion with butchersapron unproductive everyone! Come on!
Your MO, as you well know, is to continually (mis)interpret your opponent's position for them, which is precisely what you are doing in this post. It is fantastically tiresome.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
It's entirely accurate. You can't answer the questions. So you have to do this. There is no other option given that you have no answers. All very simple.
No, it's that I find you a pain, and don't wish to encourage you.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
I might be a pain, but it's because i'm asking these questions that you can't answer, and that you know that you can't answer. Or can you?
Jazzz, why do you think the person (Nevada State governor -candidate-) in the video you posted is advancing a credible argument? What parts do you find convincing and what evidence did he use to reach those conclusions that you both agree with?
What method of evaluation did you both use to gain this evidence?
What method of evaluation did you both use to gain this evidence?
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
Good old infowars, eh?
How about you tell us how the thot plickens, rather than funnelling yet more traffic to one of your pet conspiraloon sites?
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
Hmm. Advice from Jazzz...
Nuh.
Anyway, ever wonder what you look like as the list of people you so conspicuously refuse to engage with grows ever-longer? Do please keep it up, because there can be no more obvious example of your deceitfulness and dishonesty...
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
Hmm, good point. I broke the infowars link myself. But not Jazzz'z, obv.
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
I think Jazzz should be forced to break links to his conspiraloon sites. Or, even better, a RoboScript™ should do it for him. Or ban him for 4 hours every time he posts an unbroken link.
And not just because it's the right thing to do, but - and I'm not especially proud of this - because it would reduce him to a frothing conspiranoid rage at the way his right to TruthBomb™ us with his little peccadilloes would be impeded, a clear sign of FBI infiltration of Urban. I would find this amusing.
And not just because it's the right thing to do, but - and I'm not especially proud of this - because it would reduce him to a frothing conspiranoid rage at the way his right to TruthBomb™ us with his little peccadilloes would be impeded, a clear sign of FBI infiltration of Urban. I would find this amusing.
He shouldn't be posting them at all according to the FAQs:
FAQ said:
He's done it twice on this thread so far.
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
Just think how pissed off he'd be if a robomoderator just kept deleting posts from him that were merely links, regardless of where they came from?
*chortle*
8ball
Decolonise colons!
Paging @llazyllama ...
Well I've reported both posts and nothing seems to have happened.
Why is Jazzz able to get away with shit that would see others banned or warned?
two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
He's not, and isn't. It's annoying he posts shit, it's annoying he argues shit, but the stuff he does come under petty by-laws. Gunneradt is still here.
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
Yeah, that's what he'd do - and providing, into the bargain, evidence of bad faith.
But I suspect he'd struggle to find quite such a straightforward way around a ban on posting links to a specific list of sites - it wouldn't seem unreasonable to me that if he started going in for bad-faith ways around that, such as using t.co et al, it might be a banning offence.
It does seem to me that the most elegant solution would be one that required the minimum of moderator input, especially as, with him being quite such a True Believer™, it'd almost certainly develop into a war of self-justified attrition.
May as well remove that part of the posting rules then. There is no more frequent abuser of the rule than Jazzz.
Similar threads
