Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UK courtroom to hear evidence against the official narrative of 9/11

The plot thickens
Tsarnaev Aunt Claims Naked Man In Video Is Tamerlan

Infowars.com
April 22, 2013
Dan Dicks of Press for Truth says that when he attempted to conduct an interview with the aunt of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, she told him the man arrested by police in a news video of the shoot-out in Watertown, Massachusetts, last week was her nephew. Maret Tsarnaeva insists her nephew was not killed by police.
http://www.infowars. com/tsarnaev-aunt-claims-naked-man-in-video-is-tamerlan/
 
Jazzz, Do you ever read people's replies to your posts or any other discussion in these threads? From where i'm sat you just seem to lob Hand Grenades of Truth in then carry on your lunatic way with nary a thought for what anyone else has to say.

Doubt you'll even read this. Fish umbrella gibbon pants. Llama crustacean. Yeah? Reply with the codeword* if you've got this far.

*ostrich
 
Any chance you could answer Butchersapron's post #1125 rather than posting comment free links to conspiracy websites in breach of the FAQ's?
I have previously announced that I find discussion with butchersapron unproductive and would advise others to do the same.
 
That's two posters who have now advised people not to talk to me - ayatollah suggested that i (and, for some reason, joe elliot) are touts and jazzz thinks i ask questions he can't answer.
 
I have previously announced that I find discussion with butchersapron unproductive and would advise others to do the same.

In that case, why do you think the person (Nevada State governor -candidate-) in the video you posted is advancing a credible argument? What parts do you find convincing and what evidence did he use to reach those conclusions that you both agree with?

What method of evaluation did you both use to gain this evidence?
 
Jazzz is well and truly implicated in this, btw. I saw his glove puppet doing rabbit ears behind that second ringed photo of a suspect. G'wan, enlarge it and check. He was there.
 
That's two posters who have now advised people not to talk to me - ayatollah suggested that i (and, for some reason, joe elliot) are touts and jazzz thinks i ask questions he can't answer.
Your MO, as you well know, is to continually (mis)interpret your opponent's position for them, which is precisely what you are doing in this post. It is fantastically tiresome.
 
Your MO, as you well know, is to continually (mis)interpret your opponent's position for them, which is precisely what you are doing in this post. It is fantastically tiresome.
It's entirely accurate. You can't answer the questions. So you have to do this. There is no other option given that you have no answers. All very simple.
 
Jazzz, why do you think the person (Nevada State governor -candidate-) in the video you posted is advancing a credible argument? What parts do you find convincing and what evidence did he use to reach those conclusions that you both agree with?

What method of evaluation did you both use to gain this evidence?
 
I have previously announced that I find discussion with butchersapron unproductive and would advise others to do the same.
Hmm. Advice from Jazzz...

Nuh.

Anyway, ever wonder what you look like as the list of people you so conspicuously refuse to engage with grows ever-longer? Do please keep it up, because there can be no more obvious example of your deceitfulness and dishonesty...
 
I think Jazzz should be forced to break links to his conspiraloon sites. Or, even better, a RoboScript™ should do it for him. Or ban him for 4 hours every time he posts an unbroken link.

And not just because it's the right thing to do, but - and I'm not especially proud of this - because it would reduce him to a frothing conspiranoid rage at the way his right to TruthBomb™ us with his little peccadilloes would be impeded, a clear sign of FBI infiltration of Urban. I would find this amusing.
 
Just think how pissed off he'd be if a robomoderator just kept deleting posts from him that were merely links, regardless of where they came from?

*chortle*

Well I've reported both posts and nothing seems to have happened.

Why is Jazzz able to get away with shit that would see others banned or warned?
 
Well I've reported both posts and nothing seems to have happened.

Why is Jazzz able to get away with shit that would see others banned or warned?
He's not, and isn't. It's annoying he posts shit, it's annoying he argues shit, but the stuff he does come under petty by-laws. Gunneradt is still here.
 
Yebbut he had 3 words and a quote in addition to the link
Yeah, that's what he'd do - and providing, into the bargain, evidence of bad faith.

But I suspect he'd struggle to find quite such a straightforward way around a ban on posting links to a specific list of sites - it wouldn't seem unreasonable to me that if he started going in for bad-faith ways around that, such as using t.co et al, it might be a banning offence.

It does seem to me that the most elegant solution would be one that required the minimum of moderator input, especially as, with him being quite such a True Believer™, it'd almost certainly develop into a war of self-justified attrition.
 
Back
Top Bottom