Shechemite
Be the sun and all will see you
Temerity, what?
Your charges are obliged to agree with their diagnosis. Else they are in denial/lack insight.
Temerity, what?
1. Autism is not a psychiatric issue.
2. Not acknowledging something exists when it clearly does is definitely a lack of insight.
This is all quite stressful for me so again I'm going to have to leave it. I'm sorry if my posts are bothering anyone. I advocate for severely autistic people as part of my job and I encounter misconceptions on a regular basis. Dealing with it here is uncomfortable and I'm going to have to leave it. It's off topic anyway, apologies.
So are you saying someone autistic isn't, if they say so?
Believe me, the people I work with are undeniably autistic. Or don't, but if you want to assume I'm lying there's no point in any further exchange here or anywhere
Calm down.
How can one be ‘undeniably Autistic’?
You’re refusing to take on board what a number of posters have said about the subjectivity and impermanence of diagnoses and diagnostic categories, and getting yourself upset because of it.
Oh and also making some oppressive/damaging insinuations.
Yet somehow others are staying calm and you’re not.
Nobody here is saying what you're suggesting though. Nobody has said that autism is a personality disorder. That being said, historically it was considered a psychiatric issue, in which mothers were blamed, for quite some time.
The ridiculous "cold mother" thesis, among others.
Pay wall? Can't read more than the first paragraphs.How do we all feel about this turn of events?
Trans teenager Lily Madigan voted in as a Labour women’s officer
How do we all feel about this turn of events?
Trans teenager Lily Madigan voted in as a Labour women’s officer
Depends very much what the detail of the role is, IMOHow do we all feel about this turn of events?
Trans teenager Lily Madigan voted in as a Labour women’s officer
Having had a quick look my first thoughts are that - as they are analysing data which appears in other reports rather than having been given firm statistics - that more problematic prisoners (ie those that posed a risk to or were at risk from other inmates, or those that were demanding being moved to a different prison) would maybe be more likely to be reported on, and that also that trans prisoners who either started their transition in prison or who had not legally transitioned and/or had GRS before conviction would also be more likely to be reported on. Trans women who had already legally transitioned and/or were already fairly well along the conventional journey of social medical and surgical transition at conviction and who were not regarded as dangerous or at risk would presumably just be in the women's prison system anyway, maybe unremarkably so - and they might not even be "out " as trans within the system.Actual report on trans identifying males (their term) and prison here; Half of all transgender prisoners are sex offenders or dangerous category A inmates | Fair Play for Women
given the movement of prisoners in the prison system i would not be surprised if some people in the reported total of trans prisoners had been counted twice. in addition, and further to my previous post, *even if* someone becomes eligible for transfer to a women's prison that does not mean that they will necessarily be transferred. i can foresee instances where someone who declares themselves to be a woman would be refused transfer, and i expect anyone who gives it a moment's thought will foresee such instances too.Having had a quick look my first thoughts are that - as they are analysing data which appears in other reports rather than having been given firm statistics - that more problematic prisoners (ie those that posed a risk to or were at risk from other inmates, or those that were demanding being moved to a different prison) would maybe be more likely to be reported on, and that also that trans prisoners who either started their transition in prison or who had not legally transitioned and/or had GRS before conviction would also be more likely to be reported on. Trans women who had already legally transitioned and/or were already fairly well along the conventional journey of social medical and surgical transition at conviction and who were not regarded as dangerous or at risk would presumably just be in the women's prison system anyway, maybe unremarkably so - and they might not even be "out " as trans within the system.
That said, I do think there's some disquieting stuff in there, and I'm not against the issue being looked at, I just think it needs to be done carefully and with rigour.
Did you post that because you think the article about Lily was transphobic ?
I think there's a lot of people on here putting their arguments about certain trans discourses who aren't being outright transphobic, and there's been some great discussion. Posting articles from right wing newspapers that are outright transphobic isn't a particularly helpful contribution to the discussion. A lot of people are disputing the figures behind the claims in that article, e.g here
at what point does a "trans-identifying male prisoner" become a trans-woman or cease being a man?
not to mention, Manter, i would have appreciated some reference for a crucial claim in the report, namely "If self-declaration of gender becomes law, any trans-identifying male prisoner will be able to obtain a GRC and will automatically become eligible for transfer to a women’s prison". i know you didn't write the report: but it seems to me that if it's going to be relied upon then a mite more rigour would have been better.
Decisions to transfer serving prisoners between male or female prisons (or vice versa) should be based on clear criteria, with reasons given for the outcome and appeal processes clearly explained. As part of this process, it will be necessary to factor in the impact on and risks to those in current or potential establishments especially, for instance,in the women’s estate where many prisoners will have been the victims of domestic violence or sexual abuse and may continue to be exceptionally vulnerable.
In any new policy, the operational tests or criteria applied to decision making, including location decisions, need to enable staff to balance the
views and wellbeing of thetransgender person with the need to ensure the safety and security of other prisoners, prison staff and the prison environment as a whole, including the maintenance of appropriate levels of decency and privacy. Where an assessment made against these
tests overrides the person’s view on how they should be treated, relevant evidence must be identified and relate to something that could not be reasonably managed if the person was located in a place consistent with the gender in which they identify.
cheers!It's not true, here's the new policy guidelines published in 2016 after a review of tramsgender people in prisons, the proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act are not likely to affect them
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploa...le/566828/transgender-review-findings-web.PDF
I think there's a lot of people on here putting their arguments about certain trans discourses who aren't being outright transphobic, and there's been some great discussion. Posting articles from right wing newspapers that are outright transphobic isn't a particularly helpful contribution to the discussion. A lot of people are disputing the figures behind the claims in that article, e.g here
It's not true, here's the new policy guidelines published in 2016 after a review of tramsgender people in prisons, the proposed changes to the Dender Recognition Act are not likely to affect them
Depends very much what the detail of the role is, IMO
"Every year the local constituency Labour Party elects ‘officers’ to carry out the organisational and campaigning priorities of the party. There are eight key posts that must be filled - chair, deputy chair, secretary, treasurer, vice-chair (membership) and vice-chair (policy), women’s officer and youth officer - and at least four of these must be women. The women’s officer must be a woman. "
"The aims of the women’s officer are to:
Encourage women to join the party
Encourage and empower women party members to play a full and active part in the party’s activities
Build links with women in the wider electorate through campaigning, engaging on policy issues and two way communication
Ensure that the priorities of the constituency reflect the views and concerns of women members and women in the wider community
Yep. Give women a voice, only not 52 year old lesbian women who disagree with us, we'll get them sacked to shut them up instead.The irony of saying they'd be using the role to 'give women a voice' after what happened last week is what strikes me most.