Treacle Toes
Time
I think the ‘calm down’ won’t go well, but I was also surprised by how much Rutita read into that.
We can all post bullshit, catchy tunes that prove...ummm what exactly?
Just like that tune...oh yaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. sure you do.
I think the ‘calm down’ won’t go well, but I was also surprised by how much Rutita read into that.
We can all post bullshit, catchy tunes that prove...ummm what exactly?
Well yeah. But you seemed to attribute a pretty complex motive. Maybe I’ve just not been following agendas, I’m very, very tired...
I suspect my gender ID is more towards the middle than yours, even though I’ve been told having autistic traits is linked to my having an ‘extreme male brain’ (which I’m personally a little sceptical about - I’ve never been much good at ‘being a bloke’).
simpler times.
.. Personally I suspect that autism isn't even a single spectrum of related conditions, and that there are probably a whole bunch of different underlying factors that may lead to similar traits and symptoms but aren't really indicative of a single condition or cause.
Well yeah. Am I now being accused of suggesting it’d be great if we could all go back to the era of that movie?One persons simpler times may be anothers suffocating prison.
Yeah, I meant to include that. I REALLY do. I reject a lot of gender roles, have never felt much need to conform, and biologically my infertility stops me fulfilling the female sex imperative. But I am so strongly "team female", and I'm so enormously happy to be that, that my experience of gender has to be something beyond societal roles.I don't experience a gender identity that is separate from gender roles or being female.
Well yeah. Am I now being accused of suggesting it’d be great if we could all go back to the era of that movie?
simpler times.
My understanding of this is that such ideas originally stemmed from the much greater rates of autism, and even greater rates of Aspergers, in boys compared to girls. From that sort of thinking then came the idea that it might relate to extreme forms of strengths and weaknesses that were already associated with perceived male traits. eg find it easier to see things as systems and get into detail systematically, find it harder to empathise and read social cues. More recently still comes the idea that it could be something to do with levels of testosterone exposure in the womb.
I don't think its too hard to see why such explanations offered attractively simplistic explanations, or why all manner of assumptions and claims on this front will be problematic for all manner of people for many reasons, especially the stereotyped 'male traits' and the opposite ones that are alleged to be the female counterpart traits. In part because even where there is some demonstrable truth to some detail on this front, its dealing with averages and overall statistics. Which is easy to conflate with 'whats considered normal', and plays into all sorts of gender expectations and the sort of crude generalisations that people have to struggle against. And thats before we even get into issues such as the extent to which these various traits are learned by kids rather than being innate, or tell us more about the preconceived ideas of those doing the observing/creating the study methodologies that give us the average gender trait statistics in the first place, than reality.
Personally I suspect that autism isn't even a single spectrum of related conditions, and that there are probably a whole bunch of different underlying factors that may lead to similar traits and symptoms but aren't really indicative of a single condition or cause.
you made a mistake.
ASD is now thought to present differently in girls, they are thought to be missed by diagnostic criteria skewed to male presentation. Which is maybe interesting in the context of this thread. What is it that is expressed differently? Is it the same 'thing'? How and why is it different? etc.
I don't think i could be more team woman. I've worked in two different women-only settings, most of my social hobbies are women only (dance, women's choir, craft) - these are my interests but also places i can be myself and be heard away from the male gaze- and I've pretty few male friends who are all very gentle and non-macho and not very team man.Yeah, I meant to include that. I REALLY do. I reject a lot of gender roles, have never felt much need to conform, and biologically my infertility stops me fulfilling the female sex imperative. But I am so strongly "team female", and I'm so enormously happy to be that, that my experience of gender has to be something beyond societal roles.
I'm left with the answer that gender identity itself must be on some kind of spectrum.
I agree that my idea of gender ID could well be personality and socialisation, but wanted to separate it from gender roles, which have never felt like a "gender prison". I've more or less always been too fat to conform to beauty standards and I've never really felt that much gendered pressure to change that.I don't think i could be more team woman. I've worked in two different women-only settings, most of my social hobbies are women only (dance, women's choir, craft) - these are my interests but also places i can be myself and be heard away from the male gaze- and I've pretty few male friends who are all very gentle and non-macho and not very team man.
But I don't think that's to do with any kind of gender id - i think it's because my personality and socialisation, and the way men are socialised, means I don't get on with lots of them, from the sexist teachers to the cat callers to the many many laddish men (including lots of my boyfriend's friends) who treated me as if I was mute when I was young and pretty.
You watched the BBC doc, right? Those boys already knew they were on the winning team and the girls knew they were on the losing team. I'm for women as marginalised voices, as having to fight harder. I imagine this is how minority groups can feel too.
I also wouldn't count myself among among "the cis women who have most concerns about the access trans women have to womanhood (in its varied situations)" - I couldn't give a shit about who uses toilets and changing rooms on my own account, but I feel obliged to listen to women who have concerns because of e.g. having been sexually assaulted. I do have a concern about any kind of pink/blue brain narrative, in the absence of very clear evidence, for lots of personal and political reasons.
That idea sounds right to me. I think I feel the weight of that performance more in front of other men than in front of women. I wonder if that is a common feeling - that the weight of gendered expectations can be felt more among 'your' gender than the opposite one.It joins up, for me, with the (Judith Butler's) idea that gender is an interactive performance, its a bunch of actions messages symbolic practices that happen in relation to the world, other people.
When I'm alone in my flat I don't think I feel any gender identity at all but if I were to put on heels and walk down the street I would, do you see what I'm getting at?
I agree. This is another area where we don't really know much but there's an illusion of knowing.
ASD is now thought to present differently in girls, they are thought to be missed by diagnostic criteria skewed to male presentation. Which is maybe interesting in the context of this thread. What is it that is expressed differently? Is it the same 'thing'? How and why is it different? etc.
This is something I find really interesting, (what's seen as) gendered behaviour and how much it's down to socialisation and how all that comes into play with how autism presents in transgender people. I'd love to know more about it but there's still so much we don't understand.
I actually seem to present in a more typically "male" way now, although that's not something I can prove or measure and there's so many variables it would be impossible to pinpoint the change responsible.
(I haven't forgotten btw Athos, will try and answer later today)
the science behind it (extreme male brain at least, haven't read on extreme female) is incredibly sparse and highly dubious. I suspect it is only popular because it's nice and easy to understand, and has a superficial correlation.Was actually discussing the "extreme male brain" (autism) / "extreme female brain" (borderline personality disorder) theory the other day with a cis man at my autism group who, like me, has been given both dxs. I don't buy it myself, but from what I remember of the convo he saw some connection between his bpd dx and some "feminine" aspects of his behaviour/personality (think he mentioned his sexuality here too)
the science behind it (extreme male brain at least, haven't read on extreme female) is incredibly sparse and highly dubious. I suspect it is only popular because it's nice and easy to understand, and has a superficial correlation.
Was actually discussing the "extreme male brain" (autism) / "extreme female brain" (borderline personality disorder) theory
It's antisocial personality disorder and borderline personality disorder you mean. Autism is something completely different. It's not a personality disorder, it's a neurological condition.