Miranda Yardley
Willing Warrior.
Yes, of course. Even in Ireland
The cultural resistance to birth control there is tiny. Gone are these days:
Great photo!
Yes, of course. Even in Ireland
The cultural resistance to birth control there is tiny. Gone are these days:
This isn't a thread about race so I don't want to go off on a derail about it; we've only got here because of a comparison between race and gender made upthread. But yes, you could get there and have a long drawn out conversation about what to call mindsets we can probably agree we disapprove of.Defined by whom? I think at the very least that this would be disputed as a definition - I reckon a lot of people would define racism simply as prejudice based on race. Otherwise you can quickly get to what Pickman's said - for instance, Nation of Islam is not racist despite believing that white people are devils because of the power relations involved.
It's racial prejudice if the prejudice is based on race, though. What else could it be?From the position of being a member of the race that holds systemic power over the discriminated against race. Without that, it's 'just' prejudice. Not trivial or unimportant or even necessarily less harmful for individuals, but not racism, if we're going to use words to mean something specific.
Fair enough. I'll leave it now.This isn't a thread about race so I don't want to go off on a derail about it; we've only got here because of a comparison between race and gender made upthread. But yes, you could get there and have a long drawn out conversation about what to call mindsets we can probably agree we disapprove of.
So you say. What I've been reading is worries about pushing transitioning onto parents and things like that.Because the organisation behind that meeting has previously hosted speakers who want to morally mandate transexuality out of existence and ban trans healthcare.
Not very secret either given Pink News knew and published the venue in advance.
Perhaps the funniest part
There is no age limit on contraception and there is no cultural resistance to it. The same movement that eventually produced same sex marriage and self ID laws got rid of all Catholic inspired social laws except the abortion ban, which will likely go this year.
The persistence of certain people in this thread in pretending to confuse the question of whether Ireland is particularly progressive with the question of why none of the dreadful consequences TERFs claim will come from self ID have happened in Ireland would be entertainingly stupid if it wasn’t so obviously dishonest.
It's clearly a batshit argument. How representative is it though?
...morally mandate transexuality out of existence
So you say. What I've been reading is worries about pushing transitioning onto parents and things like that.
The Bahar Mustapha defence, iirc.Oh it's the auld only white people can be racist argument (due to power...) in new clothes, a load of auld shite. Fucking unbelievable.
Most people who use this phrase have not the first idea what it means or the context it arose. Raymond's book is really good.
Great photo!
But my gender identity is taught, surely? I don’t have any particular feelings that I identify as being male and it’s difficult to avoid stereotypes when thinking about how to articulate any of it.
Shiela Jeffries spoke at one of the earlier meetings, her views are quite clear. If an organisation that claimed to simply be critical of Israeli human rights abuses had a history of booking holocaust deniers would you trust their motives?
The other way of looking at this, of course, and one that many would agree with - that the new gender id law marks the latest in a number of successes in Ireland over the last couple of decades as it wrenches itself from the grip of the Catholic Church, the next success hopefully being the legalisation of abortion. The opposite, really, of being the result of a culture that ignores women's rights: part of the same movement that will also achieve greater women's rights.
A photo from the abortion pill train in 2014, inspired by the 70s contraceptive train. Women illegally importing abortion pills, openly, daring the cops to interfere.
All of the groups involved are trans inclusive and all supported the self ID law.
The other way of looking at this, of course, and one that many would agree with - that the new gender id law marks the latest in a number of successes in Ireland over the last couple of decades as it wrenches itself from the grip of the Catholic Church, the next success hopefully being the legalisation of abortion. The opposite, really, of being the result of a culture that ignores women's rights: part of the same movement that will also achieve greater women's rights.
View attachment 125646
View attachment 125647
No definition of transphobia though. It's a catchall tactic
Didn't you hear of the meeting that successfully went ahead despite all attempts to prevent it? What use do you think hyperbole is at the stage where people stop being fearful of accusations of transphobia and go and look for themselves?
What use do you think hyperbole is at the stage where people stop being fearful of accusations of transphobia and go and look for themselves?
Might be a botIt's also an anonymised tweet from an unidentifiable social network, posted by an anonymous tweeter. If it is genuine whoever said it is a dick, but that's just one dick out of 7 billion people, not really representative of anything.
Just one bad apple, eh?It's also an anonymised tweet from an unidentifiable social network, posted by an anonymous tweeter. If it is genuine whoever said it is a dick, but that's just one dick out of 7 billion people, not really representative of anything.
The other way of looking at this, of course, and one that many would agree with - that the new gender id law marks the latest in a number of successes in Ireland over the last couple of decades as it wrenches itself from the grip of the Catholic Church, the next success hopefully being the legalisation of abortion. The opposite, really, of being the result of a culture that ignores women's rights: part of the same movement that will also achieve greater women's rights.
How was it prioritised?Or you could look at it as something that affects a tiny number of people being prioritised over something that affects many, many people.
And not having access to abortion or being denied one when it's required for medical reasons is a very significant risk to mental and physical wellbeing. I imagine much more of a risk than not being able to self ID.
I would hope that people might employ the same scepticism that they might if a meeting was organised aimed at preventing proposed new rights for any other minority. Such as is there a broader agenda, are concerns about this issue being used to generate wider concerns or hatred towards a group of people?
I would support for example a feminist group that challenged religious based oppression of women. If however they booked Tommy Robinson to speak I might think that in reality their aims went beyond those publicly promoted and be sceptical.
How long have abortion rights been an issue? How long has self ID been an issue? Which one has happened and which one hasn't happened?How was it prioritised?
You do know that changing abortion laws requires a referendum, yes, and that there have been groups working towards getting one for years (and working towards a situation where the referendum will actually be won)?
Again, I don't understand the idea here that this is either/or.
Who are we talking about here? Lawmakers or campaigners?How long have abortion rights been an issue? How long has self ID been an issue? Which one has happened and which one hasn't happened?
Lawmakers.Who are we talking about here? Lawmakers or campaigners?