Nothing ever does.I'm not sure that's going to help.
Nothing ever does.I'm not sure that's going to help.
Gay women are allowed to marry each other, this was universally supported by the referendum the other year. Before the UK did, iirc?
Ireland, you must remember, was under British dominion and then RCC influence for many years. This may have slowed down progress that your country was lucky to have in a quicker fashion...
Fair enough.I don't agree with him. It is not necessary to "define women's rights solely by pro-choice" in order for Athos' statement to be true. Indeed, this was the point of my response, that I disagree.
No, it doesn't. Correct me if I'm wrong (about you) but you seem to think recognising similar levels of privilege or oppression goes hand in hand with thinking that the drivers of identity are also similar.
SEx.
Denmark does, though.Ireland's record on women's rights doesn't undermine the idea that it's states with a poor record in this regard that favour self-id for trans people.
I can't say that (3,2) is bigger than (2,3) under a typical ordering system but I can say that (3,2) is bigger than (2,2).
Ah gotcha. I don't know where my brain is today.
I think the age of consent in Ireland is 17 across the board, isn't it? I know they have wanted to change this.
Unfortunately, problems over birth control and abortion remain in Ireland, so the law on consent only really benefits men.
The causal link proposed is that a country that doesn't care about women's rights will feel equally at ease banning abortion as it will allowing men self-declaring as women to undermine attempts to create equality via protected status legislation.
(I'm not saying I endorse this perspective, but the proposed causal link seems logical enough in principle).
Denmark does, though.
It's also a question of direction of travel, imo. States like Ireland, Argentina and Malta have all been moving pretty quickly away from a legal framework that was basically dictated by the Catholic Church wrt things like gay rights, divorce and reproductive rights. They don't start from nowhere - they start from the position history has left them in. Abortion appears to be the issue that is hardest to budge here, meeting with the most fierce resistance. In the case of Ireland, changing abortion rights would require a change in the constitution, and so a public referendum. That's a big hurdle, but there is to be a referendum this year, I believe, so the direction of travel is still good. Other things like changing gender recognition laws are far easier to do, so I'm not sure we should read too much into the fact that they happen first.
The crucial point here is that in a country that supposedly doesn't favour women's rights, and allows trans ID, if men were to use this as a Trojan horse to womanhood then, we should be able to see it happening. But it hasn't happened. And why just look at Ireland? Seems that Ireland is just convenient for the TERF argument. Look elsewhere where trans people have self id.The causal link proposed is that a country that doesn't care about women's rights will feel equally at ease banning abortion as it will allowing men self-declaring as women to undermine attempts to create equality via protected status legislation.
(I'm not saying I endorse this perspective, but the proposed causal link seems logical enough in principle).
Yes, I tend to agree that this kind of self id panic is fear rather than reality. Although it's not actually me that has to worry, so it's not really my place to say.The crucial point here is that in a country that supposedly doesn't favour women's rights, and allows trans ID, if men were to use this as a Trojan horse to womanhood then, we should be able to see it happening. But it hasn't happened. And why just look at Ireland? Seems that Ireland is just convenient for the TERF argument. Look elsewhere where trans people have self id.
Anyway, this thread says it all really.
Really good reasons why self id panic is fabrication and scare mongering.
Please find something real to worry about rather than people like me. I'm no threat. I just want a decent life and equal rights.
It's a shame that the majority of women aren't being listened to on this issue, just a minority who I believe are driven by hate rather than fear, or else they would engage with us instead of permanently attacking us and filling the media with lies about us.Yes, I tend to agree that this kind of self id panic is fear rather than reality. Although it's not actually me that has to worry, so it's not really my place to say.
The fear that self id can conflict with equality initiatives, though, in the way that is currently threatening to happen in the Labour party, is based on something we are already seeing happening. As are the examples where events that are supposed to be about women's issues are being turned instead into chances for transactivists to make points about inclusivity.
What do you think the 'wheel of oppression' says about being black or being trans that you think (but don't yourself agree) is comparable?I don’t understand what you’re asking.
What do you think the 'wheel of oppression' says about being black or being trans that you think (but don't yourself agree) is comparable?
what channels it on?
and I pity a lot of you, it's so easy to read terf propaganda and think it's what women really actually believe, I was in denial, I never felt like one, I went along with it, but it was only when I met personally one of the people here I could just instantly see they'd be against me, and it was at that point I realised it was a load of shit, these shits aint what women think it's what a pack of cunts think.
Comparable in terms of privilege/oppression or lack thereof doesn't automatically mean comparable in terms of (all of) the causes of that. There is nothing intrinsic to being black that makes you know you're black (or I assume white).They have a spoke each (as does class ) - if they’re not comparable why are they presented as such?
Well I spent a lot of time spouting my own opinions, listening and asking questions, because I dont believe its a good idea to have blind spots, and I didnt want to be blind to ideas about one groups rights potentially damaging those of another.
I learnt some things that were useful. But some of the language used by a few utterly betrayed some of the less noble agendas at work, and certainly hasnt left me less suspicious of or open to being twisted by TERFs. Since I'm not about to lump a large cross-section of views into some weird generic 'what women think' bracket, the women who are blatantly using some of these issues to legitimise their contempt for transwomen are not going to taint my broader understanding of what a lot of other women think. Even when a broader range of views are rather under-represented on this thread for fairly large chunks of time.
Comparable in terms of privilege/oppression or lack thereof doesn't automatically mean comparable in terms of (all of) the causes of that. There is nothing intrinsic to being black that makes you know you're black (or I assume white).
You can answer that for yourself. Do you feel male? (I'm assuming from your name that you identify as male, though I know that isn't always the case, username-wise).Presumably the same for sex then?
i've met mm and i don't know how they identifyYou can answer that for yourself. Do you feel male? (I'm assuming from your name that you identify as male, though I know that isn't always the case, username-wise).
cool story
You can answer that for yourself. Do you feel male? (I'm assuming from your name that you identify as male, though I know that isn't always the case, username-wise).
Please describe how it feels to be female.