Says the arsehole that turned up earlier this month...
I am neither stupid, nor here to support anyone.
You appear to be trying to insult me and magically carve out some space for yourself.
FFS, a pathetic try hard; try harder for my amusement please. Go on...you cannnnnnnnnnnnnn do it....let us see who you really are.
Try putting your hand or power any where near the parts that control me and enjoy them being chewed off. That's the kind of puppet you imagine yeah?
kinky.
Sorry ... you want me to leave Nigel alone ?Try putting your hand or power any where near the parts that control me and enjoy them being chewed off. That's the kind of puppet you imagine yeah?
Define weird.
He's not a swappie (unless he's changed party very recently). And while he's been an utter arse on this thread he's right about Bea Campbell, nobody should have anything to do with that piece of shit.
I find natal is more readily understood. It's the term I use unless the context really demands cis.
Suggesting a woman only supports a man's arguments because she's sucking his cock is pretty textbook misogynist, tbf.
Well spotted you misogynist shit
It would be so much simpler if things were as black and white as you suggest in your second paragraph, if all men stuck together and there was something like the protocols of the elders of the sons of Adam. But it's not, it's more complex than that with some women supporting trans people, some women insisting they're men in skirts and doubtless male opinion divided too. I fully appreciate your point about gender as mere identity, but it seems to me gender exists as e.p. thompson says class does at the start of making of the english working class, in people's everyday relationships (sadly on bus with no copy to hand but will find I hope when get to work - here it is, it's just the first couple of pages). I feel gender not simply a hierarchy imposed from outside but a series of negotiations in the course of which it changes.
Queen theory? Tell me more
