I was referring you to Lawrence's commentary on research reported on behaviour... your questions have been answered.
Not by you they haven't. I'll ask again, do you think autogynephilia is the driver of childhood MtF transgenderism?
I was referring you to Lawrence's commentary on research reported on behaviour... your questions have been answered.
If that's the official position of Blanchard et al, then the theory is as currently formulated unfalsifiable, and on the face of it unlikely to be true.They're liars. And that's science.
I see that, with their usual sensitivity to the views of lesser beings, the British TERFs have added a Dublin date to their "UK" speaking tour. It seems that the natives aren't doing their feminism in a bigoted enough way, so some sensible Brits have to come to the colonies to tell them how to do it.
It will be interesting to see if they manage to find any Irish-based speakers. They certainly won't have anyone representing any Irish feminist organisation or abortion rights campaign. As previously mentioned in this thread, all such groups here are trans inclusive and their most frequent interaction with TERFs occur when British "gender critical feminists" spend a couple of days trolling the social media accounts of Irish abortion campaigns.
*DERAIL ALERT*
We know that the age of onset of puberty has fallen drastically in Western countries over the last century. With all the usual caveats about statistics etc, has there been a corresponding decrease in the age at which anorexia/other EDs is first diagnosed?
*DERAIL OVER*
If that's the official position of Blanchard et al, then the theory is as currently formulated unfalsifiable, and on the face of it unlikely to be true.
Well abortion's the number 1 issue for transwomen in Ireland, especially their inability to access it and those silly women 'feminists' probably just don't understand that. They're all timorous of what they can't understand, as you've repeatedly pointed out.
Sorry, I put that very badly, and really didn’t mean to minimise or disniss your point about the fear of pregnancy.Female children have it drummed into them from well before puberty that unwanted pregnancy is the End Of The World. Girls are put on the pill at 13 or 14 because parents are so afraid of it. And tbf, pregnancy does literally change your life forever for women. Both physically (your whole body is affected, little things you might not be aware of like your feet get permanently a size bigger, stretch marks, scars, abdominal wall weaknesses, all sorts of stuff) and socially (goodbye the social life you knew before, goodbye to your career in the way you recognise it pre-children, goodbye to financial independence for many many women). These things affect all of us. Yes, even rich women. Your dismissal of this as 'is that really all?' speaks volumes about how little you understand about how female biology affects us. We can't identify our way out of it. It's limiting.
Lesbians who don't want to sleep with trans women who still have penises are pretty worried about pregnancy.and I think I know some women who are sexually active but aren't worried about pregnancy...
Still though, I'm sure your friends will be able to set the natives right. Irish feminists clearly don't know what's best for them and need the wiser metropolitan TERFs of the colonial power to explain things.
Lesbians who don't want to sleep with trans women who still have penises are pretty worried about pregnancy.
Why would you be on the pill if you're a lesbian? You don't even have to have penetrative sex to get pregnant. As girls are warned in sex ed at school you can get pregnant without the male ejaculating, by transfer of semen in pre-cum from the penis by one or other of you's fingers. Seems an important concern to me.My impression is/was that fear of pregnancy isn't one of the important concerns in that scenario at all... Maybe I am wrong?
Why would you be on the pill if you're a lesbian? You don't even have to have penetrative sex to get pregnant.
Why would you be on the pill if you're a lesbian? You don't even have to have penetrative sex to get pregnant. As girls are warned in sex ed at school you can get pregnant without the male ejaculating, by transfer of semen in pre-cum from the penis by one or other of you's fingers. Seems an important concern to me.
You are thinking about it in a much more risk based way than I. I was thinking in terms of sexual choice/preference. Lesbians don't expect or want a partner with a penis, and primarily/most importantly I don't think that is because they fear getting pregnant.
To use the vernacular, from a degree of personal experience mixed with reading on the matter, I'd guess that most lesbians just aren't that much into the cock.
Seems an important concern to me.
Well quite...what I think we are talking about here is why? ..which is not the conversation I imagined having. I thought I knew why and accepted that.
What I'm getting at is that there's other reasons why lesbians might not want to sleep with trans women besides bigotry or just not liking cocks.i must admit i was being slightly flippant in response to a post somewhere in today's stuff which (and i can't be bothered to search for it) said it was a fear for 'all women'
but i'm really not quite sure what you're getting at here.
and i really hope i'm reading it wrong.
yes, of course pregnancy is a possible issue if you have sex with someone who has the opposite sort of reproductive bits, no matter how they appear outwardly (and pregnancy - or the risk of it - is no doubt be an issue for some trans-men who have sex with men), and i'm sure that thinking / talking about this is part of the process of informed consent for trans people and people who have sex with trans people.
i don't attempt to speak for all trans people, and i am sure that some are some trans people who are (for the want of a gender neutral term) an arse when it comes to sex and relationships.
but what i seriously don't believe is that there's anything like a significant number of trans people whose bits don't match the gender they present as who are out there trying to trick or coerce people into having sex with them...
...but what i seriously don't believe is that there's anything like a significant number of trans people whose bits don't match the gender they present as who are out there trying to trick or coerce people into having sex with them...
I don't really know why. I just took it as an element of definition of 'lesbian'.
What I'm getting at is that there's other reasons why lesbians might not want to sleep with trans women besides bigotry or just not liking cocks.
Yes that's my point.Aside from the same reason a lot of men wouldn't want to sleep with someone who was born a man, you mean?
i can't really speak for lesbians either, but i don't think there's a definitive set of rules about what (or who) you can and can't do. there isn't for gay men (especially if you include men who have sex with men but who don't identify as gay)
then there's people who are bisexual, pansexual (from what i gather this means they don't accept there being a binary of genders) or queer (similar only more so)
real life isn't tidy.
Yes that's my point.
Well quite. And the last thing we want is for Irish feminists and English ones to be talking to each other, God knows where that will end.
Besides that reason a man sleeping with someone who was born a man isn't risking pregnancy.Do you mean the reason I said *is* the reason, or that there's another obvious reason I'm missing?