What else does it mean to be ‘gay’ - apart from to have sex (for enjoyment) with those of the same sex?
And those of us who have sex with any gender?
What else does it mean to be ‘gay’ - apart from to have sex (for enjoyment) with those of the same sex?
Why would you be on the pill if you're a lesbian? You don't even have to have penetrative sex to get pregnant. As girls are warned in sex ed at school you can get pregnant without the male ejaculating, by transfer of semen in pre-cum from the penis by one or other of you's fingers. Seems an important concern to me.
What? Trans is a useful word for describing being trans; an experience that some women have and that some (most) others do not. I didn't say anything about the words meaning exactly the same thing.The entire debate is about what this actually means and yet you just repeat it as a truth undeniable. What's the point? Why were you happy with the term 'transwoman' if it literally means exactly the same thing as 'woman'?
Something that I can't and wouldn't attempt to describe. My point is the same.Ok. What do you understand 'a woman' to be?
My point is the same.
lesbians of my acquaintance have been on the pill because they found it eased period painsWhy would you be on the pill if you're a lesbian? You don't even have to have penetrative sex to get pregnant. As girls are warned in sex ed at school you can get pregnant without the male ejaculating, by transfer of semen in pre-cum from the penis by one or other of you's fingers. Seems an important concern to me.
I'm a bit confused about all the stuff about cocks tbh. Trans women that i know, only a handful tbf, have told me they don't want to use their penis in sex because of dysphoria and I understand that trans women who take hormones their penises don't get as hard, shrink and have other side effects. Is trans women wanting to fuck with a penis something lots of people have experienced?
Not about the threatening tweets which, if I remember correctly, were sent by one of those involved in the incident which sparked this thread, the same person subsequently arrested, and posted here then?They are everywhere, hanging about on street corners demanding lesbians have sex with them and trailing them down the road screaming transphobe at them if they refuse. Either that or it's just a clumsy conversation about hetero-normativity, social conditioning and sexuality amongst a few queer teenagers on tumblr and youtube that's been blown out of all proportion by people with a wider political agenda.
Something that I can't and wouldn't attempt to describe. My point is the same.
lesbians of my acquaintance have been on the pill because they found it eased period pains
yeh cos no man can have a platonick relationship with a lesbian.They just told you they were lesbians, to let you down gently.
So you're point is no more than:
'Trans women are something I can't describe.'
That's cool. But hardly surprising that feminists who've sought to apply some critical thinking to this issue aren't queuing up to get on-board.
They are everywhere, hanging about on street corners demanding lesbians have sex with them and trailing them down the road screaming transphobe at them if they refuse. Either that or it's just a clumsy conversation about hetero-normativity, social conditioning and sexuality amongst a few queer teenagers on tumblr and youtube that's been blown out of all proportion by people with a wider political agenda.
Lol, what patronising drivel. There are many feminists who have applied critical thinking that reject the terf outcome. In fact their thinking isn’t really critical at all, it’s a crude, simplistic, essentialist, argument that has been put forward by conservatives for decades. Their endpoint is the reactionary drivel being promoted by Yardley here.So you're point is no more than:
'Trans women are something I can't describe.'
That's cool. But hardly surprising that feminists who've sought to apply some critical thinking to this issue aren't queuing up to get on-board.
Miranda Yardley I'd be really interested to hear you spell out why you refer to yourself as transexual instead of the usual current terminology. If you go into this on your website please just post a link to the relevant place?
Lol, what patronising drivel. There are many feminists who have applied critical thinking that reject the terf outcome. In fact their thinking isn’t really critical at all, it’s a crude, simplistic, essentialist, argument that has been put forward by conservatives for decades. Their endpoint is the reactionary drivel being promoted by Yardley here.
You are the most disingenuous poster on these boards.So you're point is no more than:
'Trans women are something I can't describe.'
That's cool. But hardly surprising that feminists who've sought to apply some critical thinking to this issue aren't queuing up to get on-board.
Your pseudo-scientific 'theory' is anti-rationalist, virtually conspiraloon, guff, and your denying of rights to those who have not undergone surgery leads fairly directly to more deaths of trans people.I don't think you understand what 'essentialist' means. Please explain exactly what I promote that is 'reactionary drivel'. Thank you.
Your pseudo-scientific 'theory' is anti-rationalist, virtually conspiraloon, guff, and your denying of rights to those who have not undergone surgery leads fairly directly to more deaths of trans people.
Not about the threatening tweets which, if I remember correctly, were sent by one of those involved in the incident which sparked this thread, the same person subsequently arrested, and posted here then?
It's one thing to argue that such things aren't representative (I've not seen anyone here claim they are BTW) but you seem to be denying that they even exist.
What rights have I denied anyone?
Do you support repealing the 2004 GRA?
I oppose it being changed to accommodate self-declaration, as this may mean trans people may be taken less seriously.
I see the proposed replacement of 'gender reassignment' with 'gender identity' a step backwards. 'Gender reassignment' actually means something, whereas protecting 'gender identity' protects just thoughts and feelings. To my mind, that would make bad law.
Cunt mode firmly on bellend?Your pseudo-scientific 'theory' is anti-rationalist, virtually conspiraloon, guff, and your denying of rights to those who have not undergone surgery leads fairly directly to more deaths of trans people.
the right to have their gender identity recognised in law. Thus (for example) leaving transwomen in mens prisons where their likelihood of self harm, assault, and suicide is through the roof.What rights have I denied anyone?
Do you have an argument you would like to put forward?Cunt mode firmly on bellend?
You are the most disingenuous poster on these boards.
You are aware that many of the people you seem to be working with politically do want to repeal the 2004 act aren't you? Have you challenged them about that? What might that mean for you if it happens?
Do you think it should be legal for crossdressers or non-binary people to be refused housing or employment because of their gender identity? That's what this proposed law is about.
And as it was rejected by the Tories and Miller's bill ran out of time then this is unlikely to become law anyway. Which is a shame, because it would have represented a significant step in dismantling the state enforced gender binary.