Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Tory MP David Amess Stabbed to Death 15/10/21

First time I saw the term surgery, I thought he was a doctor or something.

A quick google says it is an office.

Odd term.
Odd that someone in the UK’s most self-important political forum wouldn’t understand the word “surgery” as used by practically every MP in the country.
 
"Prevent" truly isn't very good is it?
I don’t know the numbers, but from open source I suspect in any given year high tens to perhaps low hundreds of thousand of people are referred to it and engaged and we seem to have an attack every 18 months or so. Seems a tiny percentage to me. What would good look like to you? One attack per million referrals ? What are the success rates of similar de radicalisation programmes ( far right and so called Islamic) in other countries? Are they even smaller, do they approach say one attack per million? why are they better and what could we learn? What’s your personal estimate of the counterfactual? If we didn’t have prevent would there be less or more attacks and if more how many?
 
Last edited:
I don’t know the numbers, but from open source I suspect in any given year high tens to perhaps low hundreds of thousand of people are referred to it and engaged and we seem to have an attack every 18 months or so. Seems a tiny percentage to me. What would good look like to you? One attack per million referrals ? What are the success rates of similar de radicalisation programmes ( far right and so called Islamic) in other countries? Are they even smaller, do they approve say one attack per million? why are they better and what could we learn? What’s your personal estimate of the counterfactual? If we didn’t have prevent would there be less or more attacks and if more how many?
Thanks for this, I didn't know the numbers so maybe I need to address my initial thought. From my own understanding, "Prevent" has not always been effective, but I'm happy to learn more.
 
Thanks for this, I didn't know the numbers so maybe I need to address my initial thought. From my own understanding, "Prevent" has not always been effective, but I'm happy to learn more.

I’m absolutely sure it’s not perfect. But what would you set as your target for ‘good’?
 
I’m absolutely sure it’s not perfect. But what would you set as your target for ‘good’?
I don't know the answer to that. I'll row back from my original post, I didn't know the numbers and I don't want to dig myself deeper!

If this man is a former "Prevent" case, maybe I shouldn't be thinking in terms of numbers so much as terms of outcomes and monitoring. Nothing is perfect, nothing is fool proof. But what about the scheme changes after something like this murder?
 
Odd that someone in the UK’s most self-important political forum wouldn’t understand the word “surgery” as used by practically every MP in the country.


Odd that you would think that a Canadian would know all your terms.

Odd that you would think that a Canadian would want to get involved with your most important UK forum.

Just look at the mess last night....nope, just dropped in to watch the coverage of a British story...stayed and watched the squabbling.
 
Back
Top Bottom