or if she'd have managed to back-heel the fucker right in the bollocks.
or if she'd have managed to back-heel the fucker right in the bollocks.
If you are assaulted, you are perfectly entitled to defend yourself.
What's SM?jesus, can a Tory not go 5 mins without being a cunt?
fuck all the pricks on SM defending it as well. No, Jo Cox didn't die for some vermin cunt to assault women in front of his pals
Social media. I just had a horrible idea of how many people online will actually be tenting watching the video.What's SM?
A man publicly manhandling a woman never looks good but even worse his claim he felt threatened really doesn't hold much water, she didn't rush past him, she walked albeit briskly and he just jumped up and had at her.
And whilst I don't want to promote stereotypes she doesn't look very dangerous, she looks like the kind of woman who bakes cookies for the church fete and volunteers at the dogs home rather than a credible threat to anyone's safety.
Sadly though I suspect that other maybe a police caution it is unlikely much will happen which is a pity since he doesn't have that big a majority.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't...At the risk of bringing feminist wrath down on me, I have never struck or manhandled a woman in my life.
Did anyone else hear Col Bob Stewart (the Toriest of Tory MPs) explaining how he should have grabbed her 'to control a ... person'? It was the most telling piece of almost-letting-slip-your-misogyny. I can't find the clip now though
Another Conservative MP, Bob Stewart, told BBC Radio 4's World at One that Mr Field had "probably" placed his hand on Ms Barker's neck because if he had "touched her anywhere else he'd probably have been deemed highly inappropriate".
"She might have a belt of explosives on her," he added. "She might have a weapon."
Suspiciously exact. Rabbits are always either dying or breeding. I doubt even she knows how many rabbits she has at any given moment. That's the last time I trust the Daily MailThe Mail's immediate smear campaign has revealed the appalling fact that (checks notes) she has 31 rabbits.
Very exact number, that.
Sir Peter Bottomley said the guy should be praised.
Do you think protest is illegitimate?She was somewhere she shouldn't have been. Had she not been there, it wouldn't have happened.
And whilst I don't want to promote stereotypes she doesn't look very dangerous, she looks like the kind of woman who bakes cookies for the church fete and volunteers at the dogs home rather than a credible threat to anyone's safety.
Do you think protest is illegitimate?
She might of had a belt of deadly exploding rabbits.
Police could have raided her home and discovered articles that could be used in the preparation of terrorism, such as the recipe for Welsh rarebit.
She might of had a belt of deadly exploding rabbits.
Police could have raided her home and discovered articles that could be used in the preparation of terrorism, such as the recipe for Welsh rarebit.
The Mail's immediate smear campaign has revealed the appalling fact that (checks notes) she has 31 rabbits.
Very exact number, that.
It was a deliberately provocative protest it has to be said. This is the point of this sort of direct action and those undertaking it must accept that with this sort of protest there will likely be a response which could include being forcibly removed from the building.
This being said it shouldn't be him doing it and the force was clearly disproportionate. The stuff about him feeling threatened is an obvious lie, he just lost his temper and attacked a woman.
She was somewhere she shouldn't have been. Had she not been there, it wouldn't have happened.
Sir Peter Bottomley said the guy should be praised.
Did anyone else hear Col Bob Stewart (the Toriest of Tory MPs) explaining how he should have grabbed her 'to control a ... person'? It was the most telling piece of almost-letting-slip-your-misogyny. I can't find the clip now though
Yes, he was saying that the only way to place a woman under control is to grab her neck as anywhere else and you'll end up sat next to Weinstein. Arms seem to not exist in his world. But then in his world peaceful protest must be met by physical restraint. Cos he's a fucking dickhead.
And, if he ever pops his head over my garden fence again, he's in for a shock.
My juvenile sense of humour has me giggling at the idea of "Sir Bottomly" being kicked around by a Black Adder type