Is this mansplaining?
Yeah, but "Jo Cox", milkshakes, etc.
Fuck, I heard that. He had a whole two examples of why it was right to twat a peaceful female protestor, one dating back to 1988 was it? And 'it's unfortunate' she should have used the word 'assault'. Unfortunate? For who?My MP, Sir Peter Bottomley, was on BBC breakfast news defending him, the twat.
seems to be an utter fabricationIs this mansplaining?
This is quite the take:
That's because either they don't think they're being misogynistic, or they believe it's a valid position to take.I'd be all for a team of female assassins going after that wanker. Fuck, I'd chip in for a Go Fund Me to pay them.
Social media has been a cesspit regarding this assault. Lots of angry white men calling the woman a stupid bitch, a cunt.and saying she deserved to be beaten up etc. It's revealing how eager some misogynists are to reveal themselves.
that'd be really clever, taking part in a public conspiracy to murderI'd be all for a team of female assassins going after that wanker. Fuck, I'd chip in for a Go Fund Me to pay them.
What an absolute scumbag...
that'd be really clever, taking part in a public conspiracy to murder
given some of your posts on other threads it wouldn't have surprised me if you'd been entirely honestYes, because I was being entirely serious.
He's just been suspended as a Minister.
"Field Put Out to Pasture"
It's amazing isn't it because anyone who has seen the video - i.e. everyone - can see that that is quite an exageration of what actually happened!yeh he's fucked
View attachment 174864
if it was for 'a split second' then why did he carry on afterwards?
he'd have been better advised (and since he's a lawyer he should know this) not to make comments to the media which may contradict a defence he later desires to rely on in court.It's amazing isn't it because anyone who has seen the video - i.e. everyone - can see that that is quite an exageration of what actually happened!
he'd have been better advised (and since he's a lawyer he should know this) not to make comments to the media which may contradict a defence he later desires to rely on in court.
if he's represented in a magistrates' court then he doesn't have to appear, from my recollection of the magistrates' court act 1980 (although the law may have changed in the last 25 years and i may be remembering it wrong)I guess as a posh boy he's under the assumption that people like him don't go to court for this kind of thing.
...and he'd be right in thinking that.
no, the protester didn't find herself in a good spot at all.
A slightly longer version with sound shows that the fucker did get plenty of applause.