Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Today was the start of the Great Miners’ Strike of 1984/85.

Well he (Wolveryeti) can keep on bleating till the sheep come in. :D

And in the meantime ...
 
Anyway, where are these devastated banker communities? :D

Private schools are having to throw out increasing numbers of pupils as parents default on fees, according to a leading finance expert.

The schools are facing a struggle to survive as pupil numbers fall, largely because increasingly cash-strapped families are finding it hard to pay the soaring cost of fees.

The price of a private education has risen by 40 per cent in five years.

Leading accountant Noble Hanlon warned that schools face closure or merger if they fail to maintain pupil numbers during the worst financial crisis to hit private education for more than 30 years.

They may need to put building projects on hold and increase class sizes to keep afloat.

Speaking ahead of a conference for prep school heads at Wellington College, Berkshire, Mr Hanlon said: ‘Prep schools as well as senior schools are already experiencing parental difficulties in the payment of fees since the beginning of this term, when the effects of the credit crunch and banking crisis took hold.’

Parents will do all they can to avoid pulling their children out of independent schools including remortgaging or downsizing homes if they need to, heads attending the conference will be told.

Will no-one think of the (posh) children? :(

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ols-Students-shown-door-parents-fail-pay.html
 
Where the fuck are those big on huge unions on this?

You's funding the government/banks.

What have you got to say ?????
 
Where the fuck are those big on huge unions on this?

You's funding the government/banks.

What have you got to say ?????

what do you mean?

Nationalisation without compensation, no repossessions, cancellation of personal debts, sack the board with no pension, that'd be my starting point.
 
what do you mean?

Nationalisation without compensation, no repossessions, cancellation of personal debts, sack the board with no pension, that'd be my starting point.

I mean that I have biiiig issue with the unions' stance on this. They help to fund the government.
 
They went apeshit because the government refused to endlessly subsidise their industry at the expense of every taxpayer in the country. They then proceeded to intimidate members that disagreed with their decision, attempt to shut down other businesses, threaten people with violence and even kill people. This was both an attempt to bully government into succumbing to their demands, and to bully anyone in their geographical vicinity who stood in their way.

Fuck's sake.

The decision was made not to discuss with the NUM the economic viability of individual pits. This led to miners deciding to strike to defend their jobs, they then went to other pits who came out in solidarity.

The bullying and intimidation came from the government, via the NCB, with the police brandishing the big stick, as the decision had already been made to crush the miners.

Most of the deaths came about due to people being killed by scab lorries and desperate people digging for coal to keep themselves warm.

The taxpayers money, lots of it, used to defeat the miners, led to the mines, including those in Nottingham, being closed after the strike had ended.
 
<passes around a bucket>

:D

Am I alone in saying fuckit, bring it on?

The seppoes have fucking fled from the banks, preferring to vacate their properties cos they were frightened of what the banks could do to them personally, individually. So loads of em are fucking living on sofas, whatever.

Why should we do that? Why not refuse to move, en masse? Nothing revolutionary about that lol. Bring it on, banks, you cunts. Just how many bailiffs have you got :D

Just sit tight and refuse to move.
 
Just read this report about the strike here. Scargill brings in information that is new.Can all this be verified? My view is that Scargill is probably right and the Tories did renage on agreements and potential settlements.
 
In Novermber I guess we can remember the day it became morally bankrupt, when two miners killed a taxi driver by dropping a lump of cement through his car window off a motoway bridge. I've changed job 5 times in my life without any problem. These folks decided to murder someone to relieve themselves of the effort of doing it once.
 
That's based on your detailed research of the circumstances of nearly 200 000 miners is it? The argument made at the time was that there was no other work in most of these towns. That has been borne out.
 
Morals? Not a mention of the 3 kids who died coalpicking to keep their famuilies warm, or the social security cutting striking familes money by £15 a week, a deliberate attempt to starve them,., mo mention of the 6 picketers killed one way or another. Morals? yeah, nice one Pilate, wash your hands of them.
 
but even if the majority of notts had come out, it wouldn't have made a significant difference. a few more weeks, a few more notes in the collection buckets, but that's it.

what would have made the difference is support from other unions - and Scargill goes further than I've seen him do before in that Guardian article. NACODS is the obvious target, but there were the steelworkers, and tyhen the dockers as well. solidarity from them, or continuing the actions that they allowed to be bought off over, and the strike would have won.
i believe it would .. the strike way the strike arose, not being unanimous and not having followed ( legitimately) the same rules as all other unions have, made it harder to argue for solidarity action .. though yes of course that action should have come regardless
 
I'm not happy about what has happened to mining communities. I am happy that a single industry is no longer able to bully the government into handing over taxpayer cash through thuggery and intimidation. I think the Guardian editorial got it spot on.
arseholes like u should be made to work down mines .. i do not begrudge miners a single penny of what they earnt .. miners only statrted to eran decent money after WW2 .. and yet hundreds of thousends are to this day sufferring serious health issues from what was the nastiest job in the land
 
Ah, I give up. Cliques using violence and intimidation to try and bring the country to a halt RULEZ OK.

what are you on about? the strike was against a pit closure programme

the state made a decision it was preferable to import cheap coal mined in environmentally disasterous and criminal working conditions from third world countries rather than have an safer industry here in which people were paid at a rate that the job deserved ..

which do you support?
 
In Novermber I guess we can remember the day it became morally bankrupt, when two miners killed a taxi driver by dropping a lump of cement through his car window off a motoway bridge. I've changed job 5 times in my life without any problem. These folks decided to murder someone to relieve themselves of the effort of doing it once.
good little thatcherite .. this was the 8ts .. there were few other jobs to go to .. you honestly think most miners would have wanted to stay underground if offerred a decent job above?

yup that attack on the scabs was thick .. but this is what happens when people are pushed to the limit .. as BA has pointed out the vast maj of people who died were miners .. on picket lines and trying to get coal to keep warm ..
 
"Is there anybody out there willing to stand up – on this, of all days – and raise a toast to the wilful destruction of our manufacturing industry and its replacement by the financial services sector? Yes, there were unions who were resistant to change, but whoever came up with the idea that the solution to this problem was to import cars rather than make them ourselves sacrificed more than just the entire engineering skills base.

The forces that Margaret Thatcher unleashed in order to defeat the NUM destroyed whole communities before leeching into our society. Untamed by successive governments, these same forces now threaten to devour us all."

yes its good

2 things from the comments ..
1) that BB didn't criticise nu lab enough
and 2) fuck me but arn't guardianistas a rightwing bunch of arseholes!
 
and 2) fuck me but arn't guardianistas a rightwing bunch of arseholes!

Yeah I was thinking about this - actually though I wouldn't be surprised if this is because the article was linked to from right-wing sites... after all, anybody can comment, not just Guardian readers themselves...

This issue really is at the centre of their Thatcher fetish.
 
The miners strike was one of those points where you have to take sides.

For many of the people involved it still touches a raw nerve 25 years later. I can understand that from the point of view of folk who watched hungry people faced with mounting debt, no heating, their kids even refused school dinners, families torn apart, coppers marching through their villages waving overtime cheques at them when not beating them with impunity, all the old security destroyed except basic human solidarity holding you together.

I can even understand that from the point of view of the ruling class - Thatcher, the cabinet, the coal board coldly planning their battles to defend their class.

But some wanker like Foxy above - some cunt who read a theory out of a book and swallowed it whole who's idea of human emotion is a wind-up on a bulletin board with the advantage of anonimity. A lame defense of people who would treat him as the same sort of pawn and cast him aside when used up. Worse a defense of the very people who have not only destroyed those mining communities but have 25 years later proven themselves capable of destroying an entire societies security, futures, lives - as tens of thousands face job losses and loss of the roof over their families heads at the whims of abstract money markets. What a sad, sad level of 'involvement' in humanity that must be.

I suppose the anonomity is easy - not having to face real people - just like that of the smug pontifications of liberal journalists excusing themselves with their pretend 'neutrality'

The defeat of the miner's - of one of the key sections of the organised working class and therefore defense of wider conditions - opened up the chasm that has resulted in the chaos we see today were people don't have real jobs, make real things with real value - were illusions in making a quick buck by 'owning' a bit of property or 'owning' shares or geting stupid levels of 'credit' rather than though our own graft has become the norm. Following on from the lead of those at the top because there was little else on offer (despite the fact we are still working hard like the good little wage slaves we are in practice). And where the rug, finally, gets pulled leaving no real safety net for millions - billions worldwide. And some shameless cunt feels the need to defend the indefensible as a replacement for real feeling and emotion.

Wasn't just the miners who lost that battle. Even sad sacks like Foxy lost something important. (in his case a soul... judging by the weasel words)

You know Foxy - if you were really one of the big fish you defend you would not be wasting your time winding the rest of us up - whatever illusions you may have in yourself, you are just a puppet, a wannabe.
 
Back
Top Bottom