Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

the sir jimmy savile obe thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
frogwoman said:
It's not him making the anti-semitic comments etc to be fair. Perhaps he posted it up on there or was approached by them not knowing what kind of website it was?

How do we know that's his real name?
Click to expand...

I suspect that a blog post like that would attract those kinds of comments no matter what kind of site it was on - we all know how conspiraloons operate - any story relating to this will be posted up on the Icke loonsite and they'll flock to it, posting comments telling people "the truth". I have no doubt that if it had been posted on the Guardian similar comments would have been made.
 
anyway, fellows claims to have received a bafta award. a search of the bafta award winners database at http://www.bafta.org/awards/ does not return any results for him. neither does fellows appear on the list of eastenders cast i've already referred to. as i intimated earlier in the thread, seems to me he's a fantasist and full of excrement. if someone's prepared to lie about their professional life to potential employers so brazenly, how can you trust any statements from them unsupported by other sources?
 
frogwoman said:
It's not anti-semitic because they only mean satanic anti Christ Jews, not other Jews.
Click to expand...
bn001_l_5.jpg
 
i was at my mate's baptism at a pentacostal church at the weekend and while i was happy to sing along to alot of the hymns, i didn't sing along to anything that referred to jesus, turning water into wine or dying for our sins on a cross any of that. i'm probably going to hell now,or wherever it is that satanic anti Christ Jews go :(

Although I do wonder where all of my money is :(
 
free spirit said:
While not calling into question the guys claims directly about his experiences as a child actor, I think he probably does have some background that would possibly explain his willingness to name politicians at the end of the article, in that he runs his own internet radio show that seems pretty into anti NWO, freemen of the land type stuff.

http://www.thebenfellowsradioshow.com/#!archive/c9qb

This does give him some publicity stunt type justification for the article as well, and probably means he's not particularly worried about his reputation on the more mainstream side of things.
Click to expand...

So he's dedicated to providing a platform for frothing fruitloops?

So, if he announced "the sun rises in the East" I'd call some astronomers to check?
 
anyway

from the new private eye:
100 YEARS AGO

"Suddenly a figure looking very different began to move towards the satin dais... Jimmy Savile, a man who had devoted his life to the welfare others, especially the young... Charles was bewitched by the great man's informality, charm and infectious enthusiasm. He leaned forward and spoke earnestly to the newly en-knighted philanthropist.
'Fascinating. You really must meet Diana.'
Sir James looked momentarily puzzled. 'Is that your daughter, Your Maj?'
Charles shook his head. 'No, no, my wife.'
'No thank you very much, Your Maj. Bit old for me. That's not Jim's scene at all.'
What could he mean? Sometimes these holy men spoke in riddles.
Click to expand...
extract from 'heir of sorrows' by sylvie krin, private eye #757, december 1990
 
laptop said:
A very, very specialist market?
Click to expand...
He was trying to out-nonce the church - but for Charideee. Wonder if he ever did Children in Need? Please God don't let it be so. :( Suspect quite a few BBC programme makers will have been going through their files to make sure he never put in an appearance.
 
Now £10.50 - with 4 days left. Any luck, should beat the previous 'Celeb Touches up Cleric' record - a preliminary Holbine sketch of Thomas More goosing Archbishop Cranmer.
 
Private Eye knew enough back in 1990, according to that quoted text from Pickman's (#998)....

Some, including me, who read pretty much all of every issue back in those days, can't remember noticing those hints though ... :hmm:

Didn't help that I tended to read it in the pub ..... :p
 
What does the first part of this mean?

The force said in a statement: "As we have said from the outset, our work was never going to take us into a police investigation into Jimmy Savile. What we have established in the last two weeks is that there are lines of inquiry involving living people that require formal investigation."
Click to expand...
 
butchersapron said:
"As we have said from the outset, our work was never going to take us into a police investigation into Jimmy Savile."

What work? Never?
Click to expand...

What the ossifer wrote before a press officer got their hands on it:

"As we have said from the outset, our investigation was never going to take us into a police investigation into Jimmy Savile."

...I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Pickman's model
Sir mark rowley's time is up
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
GarveyLives
G
blossie33
Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked to the UK as a child
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
Lord Camomile
Lord Camomile
Jeff Robinson
Thread to document institutional animal abuse
2
Replies
44
Views
1K
bcuster
bcuster
Pickman's model
sir stephen house's time is up
Replies
5
Views
550
GarveyLives
G
T & P
Arise Sir Tony (Blair)
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
367
Views
13K
gosub
gosub
Back
Top Bottom