frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
Missing links.
It's not anti-semitic because they only mean satanic anti Christ Jews, not other Jews.
Missing links.
It's not him making the anti-semitic comments etc to be fair. Perhaps he posted it up on there or was approached by them not knowing what kind of website it was?
How do we know that's his real name?
It's not anti-semitic because they only mean satanic anti Christ Jews, not other Jews.
While not calling into question the guys claims directly about his experiences as a child actor, I think he probably does have some background that would possibly explain his willingness to name politicians at the end of the article, in that he runs his own internet radio show that seems pretty into anti NWO, freemen of the land type stuff.
http://www.thebenfellowsradioshow.com/#!archive/c9qb
This does give him some publicity stunt type justification for the article as well, and probably means he's not particularly worried about his reputation on the more mainstream side of things.
extract from 'heir of sorrows' by sylvie krin, private eye #757, december 1990100 YEARS AGO
"Suddenly a figure looking very different began to move towards the satin dais... Jimmy Savile, a man who had devoted his life to the welfare others, especially the young... Charles was bewitched by the great man's informality, charm and infectious enthusiasm. He leaned forward and spoke earnestly to the newly en-knighted philanthropist.
'Fascinating. You really must meet Diana.'
Sir James looked momentarily puzzled. 'Is that your daughter, Your Maj?'
Charles shook his head. 'No, no, my wife.'
'No thank you very much, Your Maj. Bit old for me. That's not Jim's scene at all.'
What could he mean? Sometimes these holy men spoke in riddles.
I think it makes him less likely to have completely made it up than someone posting completely anonymously.
and why do you think he's lying about his bafta and being in eastenders?I'm still inclined to think that he's generally telling the truth in his article,
You'd almost think there'd been some bad publicity of something.Current bid:
£3.19
No questions or answers have been posted about this item.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SIR-JIMMY...Film_TV_TV_Memorabilia_LE&hash=item43b474ac71
Fucker even tried to touch up the Archbishop of Canterbury
Eww that photograph is marked as 'used'.
He was trying to out-nonce the church - but for Charideee. Wonder if he ever did Children in Need? Please God don't let it be so. Suspect quite a few BBC programme makers will have been going through their files to make sure he never put in an appearance.A very, very specialist market?
Now £8.33.
SEE MY PAGE FOR MORE JS.................
From telegrpah:
BREAKING: Jimmy Savile probe is now a formal criminal investigation involving other living people, Scotland Yard said today.
I assuming the living refers to suspects not victims...
i don't think it's a case of 'who knew' anymore, as it's clear everybody knew. more 'why wasn't something done about him'.Private Eye knew enough back in 1990, according to that quoted text from Pickman's (#998)....
The force said in a statement: "As we have said from the outset, our work was never going to take us into a police investigation into Jimmy Savile. What we have established in the last two weeks is that there are lines of inquiry involving living people that require formal investigation."
What does the first part of this mean?
"As we have said from the outset, our work was never going to take us into a police investigation into Jimmy Savile."
What work? Never?