Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Scottish independence referendum polling thread

"Should Scotland be an independent country?"

  • Yes

    Votes: 43 66.2%
  • No

    Votes: 17 26.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 4.6%

  • Total voters
    65
  • Poll closed .
A £400k bet was placed on "No" this week. It certainly helps when no less a figure than JK Rowling calls you splitters a bunch of Voldemortists.
 
In both cases from what I have seen (including speaking to RIC activists in Scotland) it seems that they are pinning all their hopes on independence in a way that precludes any real possiblilty of change as part of Britain.

Well, for me I do think I will become much more active in Scottish politics in the event of a Yes. The UK is thoroughly undemocratic, and independence is the only real way Scots can bring real change to Britain.

I think this is true for every area except London (that strong decentralisation movements are the only way smaller regions can exert any influence). If Londoners came out and demanded change, they'll get something and so they would have to lead any mass movement.

Scots can be ignored, we are miles away and a 'special case' when it suits Westminster (and an 'integral part' of Britain for the purpose of the referendum campaign). Also, with the Tories really wanting to undermine devolution, I think if there is a No, we could be looking at a very messy Anglo-Scottish relationship over the course of decades.
 
Last edited:
Dairy Queen said:
The UK is thoroughly undemocratic, and independence is the only real way Scots can bring real change to Scotland.

Corrected for you ;)

Far from convinced there'll be any positive changes for the rest of the UK if Scotland goes yes. The reverse if anything, as I fear it.
 
Getting closer....

fca7337e-ef45-4a22-8f4d-f638b353c355_zps0c6b17f1.png

Two new referendum polls this weekend see the gap between YES and NO getting narrower. ICM for Scotland on Sunday has, after the exclusion of DKs:-

YES up 3 to 45% with NO down 3 to 55%.

The Panelbase poll for YES Scotland, reported earlier, had a 4% gap:-

Yes 48% and No 52%.


  1. A feature of both polls is that women are becoming less hostile to the notion of independence. They are still less enthusiastic than man but the gap is closing.
 
If, like me, you live if fUK*...the only way to watch tonight's jockdebate is here...apparently.

* "future UK" aka rUK
 
Snap.
Crap innit...all of us in fUK can't even hear/see the debate.:rolleyes:

It's shit! Surely they could've foreseen there'd be a huge amount of interest, even shared with a few other sites...I am getting by on newspaper liveblogs, doesn't look like they're gonna get it fixed :mad:...Cock up or conspiracy? ;)
 
So Salmond fucked up a bit?

Certainly seemed a bit un-hinged in the small section I was able to catch once STV had sorted itself out.

The immediate polling (from Anthony @ YG)..

UPDATE: ICM’s instant poll crowns Darling the winner – 56% for Darling, 44% for Alex Salmond. The figures are, incidentally, very close to the sort of NO/YES figures ICM report in referendum voting intentions. We’ll know properly when we see ICM’s tables, but I suspect we may find that people who were voting YES anyway thought Salmond won, people who were voting NO anyway thought Darling won.

UPDATE2: Full figures including don’t knows were Darling 47%, Salmond 37%, Don’t Know 15%. Sample size was 512.

UPDATE3: Tabs are here. People’s perceptions of who won were, as suspected, largely in line with their pre-existing dispositions towards independence, though not entirely. Amongst people who were voting NO before the debate people thought Darling won by 83% to 6%. Amongst pre-debate YES voters people thought Salmond won by 72% to 16%. Amongst people who said they were don’t knows, Salmond was slightly ahead – 44% to 36% (albeit, there were only 63 don’t knows, so we’re talking about the difference of 4 or 5 people). Bottom line is that there was no big knockout blow here – the large majority of both sides thought their own “champion” won, don’t knows were pretty evenly split.
 
Simple fallacy in the Scotland independence debate that neither party is addressing is that; the objective of campaign for Scottish independence is separation from British rule from London and incorporating the awed European Union rule from Brussels – notwithstanding the contention to retain the currency of Sterling Pound.
 
Simple fallacy in the Scotland independence debate that neither party is addressing is that; the objective of campaign for Scottish independence is separation from British rule from London and incorporating the awed European Union rule from Brussels – notwithstanding the contention to retain the currency of Sterling Pound.
Could you insert some grammar, please, so that we can understand your point?
 
I think it means its a bit of a misnomer calling it Independence to want most of your laws carved out in Brussels and London dictating fiscal policy. Which apparently no one is addressing.....only they are.
 
I think it means its a bit of a misnomer calling it Independence to want most of your laws carved out in Brussels and London dictating fiscal policy. Which apparently no one is addressing.....only they are.

Yeah, but it does give the jocks the right to be governed by tories that are not called tories.
 
Who has the shy vote in Scotland at the moment? I suspect given the buzz and enthusiasm from the Yes camp, No voters will be far shyer when it comes to polling? If there is a shy vote at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom