Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
eh? How/by what mechanism?Attorney General has said he broke no rules, prior to the police investigations reporting (edit: according to Sky).
This could easily bring the government down now.
eh? How/by what mechanism?Attorney General has said he broke no rules, prior to the police investigations reporting (edit: according to Sky).
This could easily bring the government down now.
Attorney General has said he broke no rules, prior to the police investigations reporting (edit: according to Sky).
Hmm. Wishful thinking?
It might, but what is she going to do if the Police investigation finds out he did in fact go traipsing around Durham? A normal person would remove themselves from the decision making process, but they'll probably order the process stopped.
It's also what he did, tbf.It's not what he did, it's what happened afterwards.
No but you seem to be wilfully underplaying the impact of Campbells role in starting a war just to paint Cummings as some sort of unique super villain. Cummings is extremely important to the Johnson project and no doubt he is valued by Johnson but to put him in perspective he is a paid advisor not even in the top three paid advisors and employed by the Government. His ideas fit the govt agenda and his non Parliament background , like Campbells, make him ideal to push the boundaries and get things done. Getting things done means often being devious, influencing and finding ways to take shortcuts.Its also an inherently risky role , you are only as good as you ideas and allies , once they start to run out both you tend to move on.No-one said it was either minor or transparent, did they?
OTOH it remains a fact that Cummings seems to wield a hell of a lot more power than Campbell ever did. And Campbell wielded his power at the behest of Blair; with Cummings and Johnson it looks at times to be the other way around.
and no saying 'I have heard or I have been told without quoting a source'Neither will I but I hope the quality of reporting on here is better than yesterday. Please make clear who's saying what, people, particularly during any questions. Some basic standards at least .
Hmm. Wishful thinking?
I don't think the latter idea is knocking on the door of the Cabinet tbhNot really, I never though highly of Johnson, but I can't believe how thoroughly he has fucked himself up so quickly. If by a new government we mean a different bunch of Tories , that's what we'll probably get. Given the ongoing crisis the co-opting of Starmer doesn't seem that unlikely either.
No but you seem to be wilfully underplaying the impact of Campbells role in starting a war just to paint Cummings as some sort of unique super villain. Cummings is extremely important to the Johnson project and no doubt he is valued by Johnson but to put him in perspective he is a paid advisor not even in the top three paid advisors and employed by the Government. His ideas fit the govt agenda and his non Parliament background , like Campbells, make him ideal to push the boundaries and get things done. Getting things done means often being devious, influencing and finding ways to take shortcuts.Its also an inherently risky role , you are only as good as you ideas and allies , once they start to run out both you tend to move on.
Bet he's late.
Taking his trip to Durham off the list, what do you think that Cummings has done that gets anywhere doctoring a dossier that is used by a Prime Minister to start a war? Right off to watch the interview.I'm not either trying to minimise what Campbell did or portray Cummings as any sort of 'unique super villain.' But the two were and are different characters and operate in different ways, and equating one with the other just serves to confuse the issue. Plus, like I said, I think youre letting Cummings off the hook too lightly.
I'm only watching for bingo words and possible meltdown
He's a Guido Fawkes writerWho is this twat on from Cambridge, defending Cummings?