planetgeli
There's no future in England's dreaming
LBW, Bairstow reviews. You know how it will end. How many times? Middle and leg ffs.
I suspected as much but thought I'd go along with it (and play it with a straight bat this time).Tbf, I'm deliberately stirring because of the shit I got (Katie Hopkins) for daring to suggest Burns wasn't the finished article after he'd scored a century.
He may well get a match winning century in the 2nd innings and, as I said back at that time, I'd be happy to be proved wrong. Because boy are we desperate for talent.
Not looking good here. This is a 450 pitch. Smith and Labuschagne will have a field day on this.
Yeah, if they wanted someone to flash at balls wide outside off stump, they could have left Roy in the team.And there's a reason Sam Curran has never scored a first class 100. He's a lower-order slogger. Nothing particularly wrong with that, but he's a place too high at seven.
What a mess.
Yeah I'm inclined to agree tbh. This is a good wicket. Aus could score 500 again on this. England needed at least 350, but the top order got out to soft shots and now the middle order can't deal with Mitchell Marsh.Genuinely clueless.
I'm actually glad this is happening in a way because a decent batting performance on a good track in a dead rubber would have only have papered over the massive canyons.
England cannot bat and have not been able to bat for a long time. Wide scale changes needed.
the middle order can't deal with Mitchell Marsh.
.
Broad could swipe a quick 40 or 50.
wtf at the over rate, btw. Still 23 overs left to be bowled today. They're going to be about 10 short at this rate, even with the extra half hour
When the ICC of 2080 rewrite the rules and give 10 penalty runs per over short we'll all see England actually scored 350/7 to this point.
/ #mystraws
It's not always the case, but those eight overs could really matter here. Two batsmen in, the new ball yes, but in the hands of tired bowlers. Wouldn't surprise me at all if Buttler got out almost straight away tomorrow. The abysmal over rate hasn't cost England 80 runs, but it might have cost them 30.351/8. Decent day there for England.
Watching Leach bat annoys me.
Its not him, I'm impressed by him. He knows his game, he has an organised defence, he gets in line with the ball and plays with soft hands and only at balls he needs to. Despite batting at 10 or jack he places a very high price on his wicket.
So if he can do that what is wrong with the rest of them? We are seeing what white ball cricket has done to our test set up here. Loads of players who have so many ways of finding the boundary but little or no ability to defend their wicket.
That's a bit harsh. I'd have taken 394 at the start. Average first innings at the Oval is 360-odd and that wins more matches than it loses, so with this batting unit I'd have taken 350.
tms had some stats on that. Warner is currently about 40 runs shy of the record for the lowest aggregate series total for an opener in a five-test (or longer) series. He's 100 runs shy of the record for an Ashes series and about 120 runs shy of the record for an Ashes series in England. He could be about to set a record that never gets beaten.Warner's innings' have been the only enjoyable bits of the summer really. I can't see England winning a series against Australia as long as Smith's playing.
Warner's innings' have been the only enjoyable bits of the summer really.