frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
I like it when people tell other people what they should be getting on a high horse about.
yeh. being concerned with something so trivial when his party is ruining the country is obscene tho.
I like it when people tell other people what they should be getting on a high horse about.
I'm tempted to put "Lizardo-Yiddish".
great to see you about!See, this is the sort of in-depth analysis I've been missing.
yeh. being concerned with something so trivial when his party is ruining the country is obscene tho.
I'm not directly helping to kill people in Libya tho am I?
Christ you are getting tedious. Are you a LibDem?
I don't call people a "div" and "scum" because they are concerned about an issue when i think there are more important thinks to be concerned about.
you havent read many of moons posts, have you?
Lochead Martin - responisble for Trident missiles and cluster bombs are being paid a good old sum for delivering this.
Military Interogators stationed in Iraq prisons received $2,000 from Lockheed Martin in 2005. The prisons included Abu Ghraib, Camp Cropper, a prison at Baghdad International Airport, and Camp Whitehorse, near Nasariyah. Lockheed Martin first got involved in the interogation contracting business immediately after September 11 2001. Lockheed Martin’s involvement in military interogations is through the company Sytex which it bought for $462 million.
After the Abu Ghraib scandal the Pentagon began awarding ‘no-bid’ contracts to Lockheed.
They actively supported the first Iraq invasion and brokered support from a number of countries so they could sell more weapons and sell weapons to a number of repressive regimes.
They are covered by the US patriot act, so the US state can access any data they hold - including yours. Fuck 'em. Make their job as hard as possible.
https://network23.org/countmeout/
No I haven't, I just find it irritating when someone's genuinely held concerns are deemed trivial "because there are more important things to be concerned about".
I'm sure you wouldn't like to be berated for thinking about what to have for breakfast, "because you should be more concerned with what the government are doing".
They are covered by the US patriot act, so the US state can access any data they hold - including yours. Fuck 'em. Make their job as hard as possible
No I haven't, I just find it irritating when someone's genuinely held concerns are deemed trivial "because there are more important things to be concerned about".
I'm sure you wouldn't like to be berated for thinking about what to have for breakfast, "because you should be more concerned with what the government are doing".
If Hitler (to invoke Godwin) turned up and started talking about the pedestrianisation of Norwich city centre, would you hear him out on the grounds that he might have a valid point or would you just tell him to fuck off on the grounds that he is Hitler?
It's wrong to say the raw data cannot be accessed by anyone, it is readily accessible to the temporary workers who collate the forms and store them in their homes. You should rather say that the raw data should not be accessed by anyone who isn't employed to carry out the census.
I certainly wouldn't tell him that the pedestrianisation of Norwich city centre was of no importance, as the government were planning to build a new airport in the Thames estuary and that was a far more important issue to be concerned about.
It's wrong to say the raw data cannot be accessed by anyone, it is readily accessible to the temporary workers who collate the forms and store them in their homes. You should rather say that the raw data should not be accessed by anyone who isn't employed to carry out the census.
I certainly wouldn't tell him that the pedestrianisation of Norwich city centre was of no importance, as the government were planning to build a new airport in the Thames estuary and that was a far more important issue to be concerned about.
Perhaps you need to go and read the stuff about how LM won't actually hold any of the data, so it's not actually covered by the Patriot Act. Or perhaps you haven't, and are prepared to accept that the Director of the ONS will act illegally regarding the collection, storage and dissemination of Census data.
You wouldn't tell him that there are lots of other things you want to discuss with him before you'll even consider the necessary access to Dixons?
Not in a discussion forum entitled "The pedestrianisation of Norwich city centre, good or bad?" given that he had been allowed into the forum in the first place.
Who do you believe has more clout? the Head of the ONS paying LM £150 million or the US state giving out arms contracts? Whether the US state are really interested in knowing if I'm a Jedi is more questionable, but the other points stand. LM are responsible for mass murder. Fuck 'em.
The professor is wrong, and the director of the census is right: Raw data cannot be accessed by anyone, only the statistical data derived from the census.
Aggregate data may be accessible, but aggregate data is hardly conducive to intelligence trawls. It's no more useful than general demographic data ever is.
Not in a discussion forum entitled "The pedestrianisation of Norwich city centre, good or bad?" given that he had been allowed into the forum in the first place.
No, wouldn't say you were wrong. We would actually say that we don't care to discuss simple numerical tautologies with you so long as you carry on giving whole-hearted support to the systematic dismantling of the welfare state.You underestimate just how single-minded this forum board is in blaming the Lib Dems for all the worlds ills. I could say 1 + 1 = 2 and they would still contest it on the basis that i'm a party member.
You underestimate just how single-minded this forum board is in blaming the Lib Dems for all the worlds ills. I could say 1 + 1 = 2 and they would still contest it on the basis that i'm a party member.