Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Teenager who filmed himself raping girl 'deserves leniency because he's from a good family’-US judge

[quote"]My point is that castrating rapists is futile, pointless, and completely misses the point of the issue. These calls for castration are just like the cry that goes up for the death penalty every time some heinous offence [ /QUOTE]
Screaching lefties showing why their hysteris is better than the right wing version.,
Yeah, you're right. I'm burned by the cogency of your argument, not to mention your elite quoting skills. Twat.
 
Yeah, you're right. I'm burned by the cogency of your argument, not to mention your elite quoting skills. Twat.

Having displayed his moral and intellectual superiority and exposed rampant hypocrisy by linking to an unrelated thread from a decade ago, I think it's only a matter of time before he unleashes the atomic bomb of a rolleyes smiley and a "typical urbanz" remark.
 
Why is anyone surprised by this? This is the world now. These people - who have always been there - are on the rise, they see it as their time again. And it’s going to get a fuckton worse before it gets better :( :mad:
Age of the psychopath innit.
 
He led her down to the basement.
He barred the door so she couldn't get out and noone could get in.
He texted his mates.
He filmed himself raping her.
He shared the video.

'When your first time having sex is rape' is what he wrote.

He knew what he was doing. He's not an idiot, he is an entitled rapist, already.
Have you heard of the ‘affluenza’ defence?
Affluenza - Wikipedia
 
[quote"]My point is that castrating rapists is futile, pointless, and completely misses the point of the issue. These calls for castration are just like the cry that goes up for the death penalty every time some heinous offence
Screaching lefties showing why their hysteris is better than the right wing version.,[/QUOTE]

Never mind that, just using it to have a pop at urban. What do you think about the case athand? Say something?

My gut reaction is fucking crucify them both. One upside down. But yes as mentioned this entrenched privilege. All are equal before the eyes of the law.
 
Scary the number of situations like this there must be where the girl and her family have taken the pay-off and dropped the charges and the boy has gone on to his lovely school and career without the wider world ever finding out. At least this one looks like there's a chance he won't get away with it - indeed we only know about it because there's a chance he won't get away with it.
 
I have a theory that a portion of rapists have already been told about how they shouldn't rape women and somehow do it anyway.
A portion. But his defence lawyers are arguing she should not have reported to the police and put a respectable family through the trauma of publicly acknowledging their son is a rapist. It recalls the Stanford rapist's father who referred to "twenty minutes of action" as too trivial to put his son through a trial for.

They didn't teach their sons not to rape. Even after they had raped they were teaching them that they were entitled to impunity.
 
A portion. But his defence lawyers are arguing she should not have reported to the police and put a respectable family through the trauma of publicly acknowledging their son is a rapist. It recalls the Stanford rapist's father who referred to "twenty minutes of action" as too trivial to put his son through a trial for.

They didn't teach their sons not to rape. Even after they had raped they were teaching them that they were entitled to impunity.
This.

Only I wonder about "teaching him not to rape" - I find myself wondering if people are inclined to rape by default, and have to be taught not to, or whether what actually happens is that a culture of misogyny exists within someone's environment as they grow up, which effectively teaches them TO rape? Or, at least, that there's nothing particularly wrong with it.
 
A portion. But his defence lawyers are arguing she should not have reported to the police and put a respectable family through the trauma of publicly acknowledging their son is a rapist. It recalls the Stanford rapist's father who referred to "twenty minutes of action" as too trivial to put his son through a trial for.

They didn't teach their sons not to rape. Even after they had raped they were teaching them that they were entitled to impunity.

TBH I think there is a bit of a division between what the family thinks and how the lawyers behave. The families - though not that Stanford dad - usually refuse to believe that little Timmy could ever have done anything like that; he must have been fitted up / led on / some form of conspiracy against him has occured / "he isn't that sort of kid" , and this can even continue after the evidence has emerged proving what he has done where it doesn't make sense that something they know conflicts with objective reality. It is after all really easy for a parent to believe their child over someone elses kid, and whilst it should be condemned I am not sure that it should surprise anyone when it happens.

The lawyers on the other hand are either incredibly inept (which can be discounted straight away) or could only have raised that defence if they had a very good idea that this judge in particular would react to it, which should suggest that this is not an isolated case and might indicate they had used it themselves in the past. I am all for lawyers seeking truth but to raise a "so what" defence like that is a disgrace
 
Not sure wether the rapist is a dribbling idiot who should be confined as he is a risk to others. Or just an arrogant prick. Hard to tell gross stupidity from evil sometimes.
It will ruin his life ,but, he could have just not raped someone so hard to sympathise.
 
Scary the number of situations like this there must be where the girl and her family have taken the pay-off and dropped the charges and the boy has gone on to his lovely school and career without the wider world ever finding out. At least this one looks like there's a chance he won't get away with it - indeed we only know about it because there's a chance he won't get away with it.

Yep - this guy has apparently been a judge for decades, who knows how many rapists from "good families" he has been lenient with so they can go on to become drink-spiking frat boys.
 
Putting the various other aspects aside for a moment, what sort of idiot films themselves committing a serious crime and then sends out the film saying "watch this film of me committing a serious crime"?

Probably one that doesn't care about being arrested because he knows a cunt judge, but also one that now thinks he can get away with it so might well do it again
 
A portion. But his defence lawyers are arguing she should not have reported to the police and put a respectable family through the trauma of publicly acknowledging their son is a rapist. It recalls the Stanford rapist's father who referred to "twenty minutes of action" as too trivial to put his son through a trial for.

They didn't teach their sons not to rape. Even after they had raped they were teaching them that they were entitled to impunity.

If you read a little further along from that point in the thread, I was more talking about the futility of just adding in "don't rape" messages when you're swimming against the tide of a culture that legitimises it, but I agree that in these cases even that message doesn't seem to have been a prominent part of the home environment.
 
Why is anyone surprised by this? This is the world now. These people - who have always been there - are on the rise, they see it as their time again. And it’s going to get a fuckton worse before it gets better :( :mad:
That brought to mind a quote who I want to attribute to Dworkin about porn and fetish - that it will get a lot worse before it gets better.

This boy watches too much porn. That's not an excuse for why he did what he did but I'd put money on it being a contributing factor.
 
https://www.urban75.net/forums/threads/is-a-15-year-old-a-child-or-an-adult.235493/


Not so long ago Saudi Arabia was seen as a horrific country for its practice of mutilation for crimes. Now you can call for this on here and no one bats an eye lid.

Fascinating watching threads like this.
The world has changed a great deal in the past few years.
People like me are completely out of touch with it.
I do not agree he should be tried as an adult. He should be given an appropriate sentence for his crime and age, i.e., time away from family but with proper counselling enabling him to reflect on his actions and why they were abhorrent.
 
Scary the number of situations like this there must be where the girl and her family have taken the pay-off and dropped the charges and the boy has gone on to his lovely school and career without the wider world ever finding out. At least this one looks like there's a chance he won't get away with it - indeed we only know about it because there's a chance he won't get away with it.
And then how many times he goes on to do it again, and how many women's lives he completely fucking ruins.
 
What I find disturbing is the notion that what happened in these cases is dismissed as "a mistake". It's not a mistake is it? It's indicative of a deeply nasty character trait. I don't believe anyone ever raped anyone "by mistake". That it's a few moments "out of character". They must believe that they can just take whatever they want from another person.

And everyone around them, all their parents, lawyers, judges etc. also believe it's "a mistake" that can be just wished away without consequences as it's such a minor thing after all.

And these people, if they are allowed to go on to their good schools and good prospects and become lawyers, judges, policitians etc., they are people who believe that it's all "just a mistake" because it was a mistake for them right? So the bullshit perpetuates itself, seemingly forever.
 
What I find disturbing is the notion that what happened in these cases is dismissed as "a mistake". It's not a mistake is it? It's indicative of a deeply nasty character trait. I don't believe anyone ever raped anyone "by mistake". That it's a few moments "out of character". They must believe that they can just take whatever they want from another person.
Absolutely this. How long exactly does a mistake take to make? How far into that mistake do you have to go before realising it is a mistake? It's a bollocks excuse.
 
What I find disturbing is the notion that what happened in these cases is dismissed as "a mistake". It's not a mistake is it? It's indicative of a deeply nasty character trait. I don't believe anyone ever raped anyone "by mistake". That it's a few moments "out of character". They must believe that they can just take whatever they want from another person.

And everyone around them, all their parents, lawyers, judges etc. also believe it's "a mistake" that can be just wished away without consequences as it's such a minor thing after all.

And these people, if they are allowed to go on to their good schools and good prospects and become lawyers, judges, policitians etc., they are people who believe that it's all "just a mistake" because it was a mistake for them right? So the bullshit perpetuates itself, seemingly forever.
Totally. There are plenty of stupid things teenagers might do because they don't think through the consequences for others, which might result in tragedy but can ultimately be forgiven. Speeding/drink driving, for instance. This is not one of those. The consequences for others are right there in front of him as he does it.
 
I wonder what their reaction would be if it was their daughter he'd raped. Would they still think he'd made a mistake and should be allowed to get away with it.

This whole shit baffles me. I don't understand how people see this crime. Perhaps I'm just not rich enough.

I wonder too how much this judge's, and others, view is legitimised by having a president who talks about grabbing women by the pussy and thinks sexual assault is something you can do with impunity.

It's all such a total fuck up.
 
Absolutely this. How long exactly does a mistake take to make? How far into that mistake do you have to go before realising it is a mistake? It's a bollocks excuse.

It's ludicrous. Was it pre- or post- or mid-mistake when he was later sharing the video with his mates?

Like with Rutita's earlier description - he leads her downstairs, he bolts the door, then there is what most people would describe as a pretty clear fork in the road, and none of the further branch points show any remorse or desire to get off the path.
 
'20 minutes of action' was what Brock Turner's dad called his son's rape of a woman, deeming it shouldn't have to ruin his life.

This rapist and the judge come from the same fucking tribe clearly.
By "action", does he explicitly mean sexual activity? As in "did you get any action last night?"
If so, it's quite clear what he thinks happened and therein lies the problem.
The cycle will never stop until these people start being properly prosecuted for what they have done.
 
'20 minutes of action' was what Brock Turner's dad called his son's rape of a woman, deeming it shouldn't have to ruin his life.

This rapist and the judge come from the same fucking tribe clearly.

I don't like the choice of language they use either (speaking of Brock's family, and the judges in these cases).
I actually agree that it shouldn't have to ruin this young man's life, but it absolutely should have to change it.

It's like they're using one to mean the other.
 
Back
Top Bottom