barney_pig
Po-cha-na-quar-hip
I was a lefty train spotter in the SWP- even had the spartacists round whilst I was a member, there were plenty of others, but one had to be quiet about it in front of the gaffers.
Where should they be looking in terms of theory post adorno and debord?only have gone as far as Debord and Adorno) is a bit...well crap.
And yet you have turned solely to whine about other lefty groups' behaviour! You seem to be even more oblivious than the people you're trying to criticise!
Theory?Where should they be looking in terms of theory post adorno and debord?
Theory?
it comes from the general contempt the CC holds for the membership more broadly, i think. for a long time now there has been no criteria for membership, not even the slightest degree of political like-mindedness - this is because the CC consider the education of the 'footsoldiers' as a sickening decadence, when time would far be best spent not knowing anything and just selling papers. this is also a by-product of the CC's degraded ambitions for the organisation, which having lost sight of an overarching project long long ago, now focus solely upon fulfilling the same ritualistic activities centred primarily around sustaining the bloated bureaucracy in its place.
the real issue is that the CC don't really care about politics, engaging people, or anything else. they're all mates from way back when, the creme de la creme of Cliffite arselickers, and they have a neat little niche in a world for which they are otherwise unqualified (only Callinicos has spent any significant time in a job not on the CC and not being a student). this niche allows them to essentially live a lazy lifestyle, in which they are simultaneously revered, and in which they can ostensibly live the life of an exciting Bolshevik revolutionary.
IMO
Thanks for that -- interesting
I presume he meant that as uberdog has recently been one of the more aggressive SWP defenders on here over the last 5 years that for him to say that was interesting. Certainly was interesting to me.In what way is it interesting william? In what way does that add to your understanding of that kind of organisation in this kind of context?
go on...
To say they don't really care about politics, is absolutely staggering especially coming from a former member...
Also to say they don't care about the political education of their members - why Bookmarks? Why ISJ? Why the pamphlets and discussion forums/public meetings?
It may not be the politics or political education we would like to see but it's writ large across loads of what they do...
You are of course correct about the membership criteria, and about the CC being a gang of mates who run their fiefdom as they see fit - but that is a symptom of what they do as much as being one of the reasons behind it.
I presume he meant that as uberdog has recently been one of the more aggressive SWP defenders on here over the last 5 years that for him to say that was interesting. Certainly was interesting to me.
they don't give a shit mate
you don't even need to be critical to raise their ire, often you can do it simply by acting off your own initiative and running local campaigns which aren't directed entirely through the centre
income.why Bookmarks? Why ISJ? .
income.
Pretty much that. I certainly remember Das Uberdog being much more of an SWP defender than he was in that earlier post.
they give a shit that they stay in their untouchable positions and don't have to work a real job - give me one consistent theoretical position on a given issue that any of the CC have maintained against criticism over the past 10 years. nothing they stand by, democratic centralism, analysis on anti-fascism, the economic crisis, is ever clearly defined and the rhetoric in no instances lives up to the reality. the SWP still churns out books like 'The Two Souls of Socialism' to its young members, chats shit about how they can't allow their members to get tangled up in the bureaucracy of Trade Unions, whilst simultaneously and brazenly promoting its members into bureaucratic positions in the TUs... on nothing can you pin them down
they don't care, and that's shown up in the way they've dealt with the present dispute. i can't go into details yet, but by expelling Paris and the rest the CC have pretty much openly declared that they care more about maintaining their own little fiefdom than they do about any kind of politics - especially in light of the allegations which have been made about a given CC member. how else do you explain the absolute and utter hostility to otherwise productive and loyal individuals who raise even the most minor internal criticisms? or the happiness of the leadership to allow the organisation to stagnate into repetitive and directionless activities? or the way they so quickly sell out with campaigns like UAF as soon as it starts to present any kind of personal risk to them individually?
they don't give a shit mate
What about Charlie Kimber industrial organiser?