Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

This is like 'simon says'.

'No revolutionary party can base itself on anything except continual discussion and debate'; stay just as you are.

The CC says 'no revolutionary party can base itself on anything except continual discussion and debate'; better get busy...

...but don't forget to listen out for the next instruction...and take care to listen carefully, you wouldn't want to get it wrong.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
I'll re-post something i posted years ago and add a fw links to shorter texts:

Italy 1977-78: Living With An Earthquake - Red Notes
Working class autonomy and the crisis : Italian Marxist texts of the theory and practice of a class movement 1964-79 - Red Notes
Italy: Autonomia: post political politics
Storming Heaven: Class Composition and Struggle in Italian Autonomist Marxism - Steve Wright (should probably be your intro text along with the essential intro.chapter to Reading Capital Politically).
Books for Burning - Negri
Revolution Retrived - Negri - two collections of his fine 70s work.
Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics. (pdf)

Other interesting/useful stuff:

Strike One to Educate One Hundred - early red Brigades stuff - up to mid-late 70s
Stefano Delle Chiaie: Portrait of a Black terrorist - fascsist terrorism in post war Italy and the links with the state, NATO, gladio etc
The Revolutionary Mystique and Terrorism in Contemporary Italy - Richard Drake (interesting but his interpretations of what marxism is/was is way off, but this has loads of stuff that others don't
The Judge and the Historian - Carlo Ginzburg, great investigation into the fallout fo the bomb PInelli fell out of a window for.
The Italian Resistance: Fascists, Guerrillas and the Allies - Tom Behan
Long Awaited Moment: The Working Class and the Italian Communist Party in Milan, 1943-1948 - Behan - both these cover the potential revolutionary moment immediately after Musso's fall etc
Moscow and the Italian Communist Party: from Togliatti to Berlinguer - Joan Barth urban
The Italian left in the 20th Century -De Grand, standard intro text.
Also, a fascinating book, Between Hollywood and Moscow: The Italian Communists and the Challenge of Mass Culture, 1943-91, goes very well with that Bona della book i mentioned above.

For short intro texts:

Our operaismo - Mario Tronti
The Renascence of Operaismo (recommended)
There and back again: mapping the pathways within autonomist Marxism
From operaismo to autonomist Marxism and The limits of Negri's class analysis: Italian autonomist theory in the seventies both offe excellent critiical thoughts from within/sympathetic to the tradition


Thanks so much, that's great!

This is barely scratching the surface to be honest.

Hehe, it's a good start :D
 
This is like 'simon says'.

'No revolutionary party can base itself on anything except continual discussion and debate'; stay just as you are.

The CC says 'no revolutionary party can base itself on anything except continual discussion and debate'; better get busy...

...but don't forget to listen out for the next instruction...and take care.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice


For the benefit of any CC members who might be reading:

arse-elbow.jpg

Hope this helps.
 
Didn't the SWP CC declare the discussion is now over in january? Yet now we find Kimber offering this in public:
mad isn't it? they lie, do the opposite of what they say, say the opposite of what they do, accuse the opposition of doing and saying what they themselves are doing and saying.
what's even madder, is people like bolshiebhoy actually going along with it, saying whatever he thinks they want him to say. the life of a cc loyalist must be strange and contradictory.
 
is it any wonder people laugh at trots?

I'm no theorist, and I sure wouldn't claim to know what all socialists are supposed to get up to but to a simple soul like me that attitude, "strike whenever possible" seems a pretty good way to polarise workers into the arms of the tories.

Not only is confrontation at all costs plainly tactical nonsense it's strategically utterly inept to seek strikes as an end in themselves. Unless you're a vanguard party trying to build membership and paper sales with zero regard for anything else, I s'pose.
strike whenever possible and confrontation at all costs are two completely different things.

personally i would say strike whenever possible if it's winnable. we're in a war, anytime you can win a battle, have the battle.

as for getting laughed at, my experience differs.
the time that illustrates it best was when i was an apprentice. the foundry i worked at had meetings in the canteen, attended by almost all (20-30ish, depending on shifts), over all important issues. the first one i attended, i can't remember the issue but i proposed strike action, just testing the water, didn't even get seconded, embarrassing but at least i'd put down some sort of marker. the second time i got seconded but beaten in the vote 18-2 (not sure about the 18 but definite about the 2!), a bit shit, but at least now i had an ally, trevor, electrician, ex steward and ex soldier with a reputation for bolshyness.
the next time we had a vote it was over redundancies, i made a barnstormer of a speech, involving waving my dads watch about (it was on his wrist at the time, he was a bit startled) whilst shouting "twenty five fucking years and that's what you get, a bit of fucking tat and chucked on the scrapheap!". we got eight or nine in favour that time.
ironically, the next meeting was about my sacking. i'd been a bit cocky doing all this as an apprentice and earned the ire of the managing director. trouble was i was so much better at the job than the other apprentices, plus my dad and one of my grandads had worked there, i thought i was pretty unshiftable but the end of the apprenticeship was the end of my contract and they fucked me off. i didn't speak at the meeting but strike action was proposed, seconded and lost the vote by about twenty to twelve, with some abstentions. my department, maintenance, accounted for ten votes for and two abstentions.
so, what i found was that i actually got taken more serious as time went on, especially by those i worked directly with.




as for the "inept to see strikes as an end in themselves", i also disagree. the official reason for a strike is often irrelevant (printers, petrograd, punctuation, blah blah), what makes the strike important, pivotal even, is the fact you, and your mates, with no leaders or ones you've elected yourselves, are getting together collectively and taking on the class enemy, directly, at the very point of your exploitation. strikes at their best also change people, racism and sexism can be challenged, socialist arguments can gain a hearing, unity is strength is self evident.
 
i've just remembered a couple of anecdotes that maybe illustrate my point.

frank henderson once told me about one time at longbridge, all the blokes toolboxes had been replaced with big tool lockers, which were lovely, but the blokes were incensed. how dare management move our toolboxes! they stopped work and had a meeting with their steward, whose nickname was "come back monday", 'walk out now, come back monday, those that say aye, raise your hand, see you monday.'
by monday stewards agreed to accept the lockers as long as personal toolboxes could be kept alongside and any future changes would involve consultation. they had got the lockers they wanted and given management a bloody nose at the same time. the only way they could reach that level of control and solidarity was through hundreds of literally tuppeny ha'penny strikes they had won over piecework in the sixties.


another one i read in a book, some place in liverpool making electrical stuff for the gpo, i think they weren't on piecework but had to get a certain count in every day. as with most jobs like that, you get quicker with experience and earn yourself a bit of free time. these days when that happens you have to pretend to work the remainder of the time but this was the seventies so they played subbuteo. this got quite popular, they had leagues and quite a few supporters. this rankled massively with management who banned it. this lead to an immediate walkout which was settled when management agreed to allow subutteo, but with only two supporters for each side. as the straightfaced stewards committee got up to leave the meeting, one of them started whistling the match of the day theme tune, which all the others joined in with!

that was when we were winning.
 

Does anyone else think that maybe they take this punching above their weight thing a bit literally at times?

In October 2009, the SWP's then National Secretary Martin Smith was charged with assaulting a police officer at the Unite Against Fascism (UAF) demonstration against BNP leader Nick Griffin's appearance on the BBC's Question Time programme. Smith was found guilty of the assault at South Western Magistrates' Court, London, on 7 September 2010. He was sentenced to a 12-month community order, with 80 hours' unpaid work, and was fined £450 pending an appeal. (Smith was arrested again in July 2012 at a UAF demonstration against the EDL in Bristol.) Following a UAF demonstration against the English Defence League (EDL) in Bolton on 20 March 2010, SWP Central Committee member Weyman Bennett was charged with conspiracy to incite violent disorder but the charge was dropped in November 2010​

Physical resistance is one thing, but getting nicked for bashing coppers is not very clever...
 
Cause as with this disgusting slur by Anna Chen in ther Groniad yesterday http://adf.ly/SJ6kk it's becoming acceptable to say anything no matter how stupid, factually wrong or irrelevant about anyone who is or was a leader of the swp and someone will repeat it as gospel.
Christ that's bad, the irony being many people would accuse the SWP of the exact the opposite, of not carrying enough about the indigenous white working class.
 
i've just remembered a couple of anecdotes that maybe illustrate my point ...that was when we were winning.
Soon after I started work at the International Harvester tractor factory in Doncaster the chief shop steward had a chat with me and told me about such days. His best example came from the heatwave of '76. A number of lads had been playing football at lunchtime and were hot and sweaty when they came in. They demanded water from the management before rejoining the line. But when the water came, walked out anyway claiming the water wasn't cold enough. Everyone else joined them, glad of the sunmer's afternoon for themselves.
 
i've just remembered a couple of anecdotes that maybe illustrate my point.

frank henderson once told me about one time at longbridge, all the blokes toolboxes had been replaced with big tool lockers, which were lovely, but the blokes were incensed. how dare management move our toolboxes! they stopped work and had a meeting with their steward, whose nickname was "come back monday", 'walk out now, come back monday, those that say aye, raise your hand, see you monday.'
by monday stewards agreed to accept the lockers as long as personal toolboxes could be kept alongside and any future changes would involve consultation. they had got the lockers they wanted and given management a bloody nose at the same time. the only way they could reach that level of control and solidarity was through hundreds of literally tuppeny ha'penny strikes they had won over piecework in the sixties.


another one i read in a book, some place in liverpool making electrical stuff for the gpo, i think they weren't on piecework but had to get a certain count in every day. as with most jobs like that, you get quicker with experience and earn yourself a bit of free time. these days when that happens you have to pretend to work the remainder of the time but this was the seventies so they played subbuteo. this got quite popular, they had leagues and quite a few supporters. this rankled massively with management who banned it. this lead to an immediate walkout which was settled when management agreed to allow subutteo, but with only two supporters for each side. as the straightfaced stewards committee got up to leave the meeting, one of them started whistling the match of the day theme tune, which all the others joined in with!

that was when we were winning.

Frank was a good guy. Shame there's not a lot more like him
 
personally i would say strike whenever possible if it's winnable. we're in a war, anytime you can win a battle, have the battle.
well yes, I was hardly expecting to be in a minority of more than one! not on here :)

your anecdotes are great, concerning as they do 'the foundry' where your grandad and dad had jobs for life and you had an apprenticeship, Longbridge and making stuff for the GPO. When I was a kid the men on our estate would occasionally all turn up at some really odd time of day and then just as suddenly all go back to work again. When I first tried I had real problems getting into the union, dealing with the restricted entry, getting nominated & seconded and that, but then the ticket got me onto card-check jobs with the stewards conflabbing about which grades should do what and the occasional down tools and threatened walkout. and, of course, the old blokes sending the new lad off to the stores for a left handed spanner...

it's great isn't it, nostalgia.

different world from today though. virtually no-one under 40 who doesn't read history books (or watch fuzzy documentaries with dodgy colour) will have a scoobie what we're on about, and many of those twenty or more years older went through all that and then turned their back on it, went on to elect, and re-elect, you know who.

Will it ever come back? for the majority, like. I doubt it but it might. Collective working (and the bargaining that goes with it) in industrial workplaces with clear demarcation based on the colour of overalls, the foreman and the steward, being able to stop the line over crude, obvious exploitation, the brazier by the gates, leapfrogging and differentials.

different world. if you still work in that world, if that's the reality around you, then good luck to you, argue your case, get your workmates onside, fight the collective battles against the clear class enemy, hang on to those traditions for dear life. Maybe there's some of it left in the public sector, I don't know, I've only ever dipped a toe.

The IS tradition is based around that narrative.

Personally, when I left school, I could see the older kids who I'd looked up to when I was like 12 or something, as they sat next to their dad in the pub after their shift at the factory making bits of car, same body shape, same expression, same pint, same conversation, same eyes. I ran away. I worked in plenty of factories but never that one, and then it closed anyway. You can blame me for for the destruction of the collectively exploited working life if you like, but I've never regretted running away.

Now the site is a bunch of little units where people nominally do stuff about online shopping metrics or something but actually spend their time on Facebook.

Do you really think all the white collar, well educated, individual contract, aspirational modern working class wants any of that?
 
well yes, I was hardly expecting to be in a minority of more than one! not on here :)

your anecdotes are great, concerning as they do 'the foundry' where your grandad and dad had jobs for life and you had an apprenticeship, Longbridge and making stuff for the GPO. When I was a kid the men on our estate would occasionally all turn up at some really odd time of day and then just as suddenly all go back to work again. When I first tried I had real problems getting into the union, dealing with the restricted entry, getting nominated & seconded and that, but then the ticket got me onto card-check jobs with the stewards conflabbing about which grades should do what and the occasional down tools and threatened walkout. and, of course, the old blokes sending the new lad off to the stores for a left handed spanner...

it's great isn't it, nostalgia.

different world from today though. virtually no-one under 40 who doesn't read history books (or watch fuzzy documentaries with dodgy colour) will have a scoobie what we're on about, and many of those twenty or more years older went through all that and then turned their back on it, went on to elect, and re-elect, you know who.

Will it ever come back? for the majority, like. I doubt it but it might. Collective working (and the bargaining that goes with it) in industrial workplaces with clear demarcation based on the colour of overalls, the foreman and the steward, being able to stop the line over crude, obvious exploitation, the brazier by the gates, leapfrogging and differentials.

different world. if you still work in that world, if that's the reality around you, then good luck to you, argue your case, get your workmates onside, fight the collective battles against the clear class enemy, hang on to those traditions for dear life. Maybe there's some of it left in the public sector, I don't know, I've only ever dipped a toe.

The IS tradition is based around that narrative.

Personally, when I left school, I could see the older kids who I'd looked up to when I was like 12 or something, as they sat next to their dad in the pub after their shift at the factory making bits of car, same body shape, same expression, same pint, same conversation, same eyes. I ran away. I worked in plenty of factories but never that one, and then it closed anyway. You can blame me for for the destruction of the collectively exploited working life if you like, but I've never regretted running away.

Now the site is a bunch of little units where people nominally do stuff about online shopping metrics or something but actually spend their time on Facebook.

Do you really think all the white collar, well educated, individual contract, aspirational modern working class wants any of that?

As you are part of them what do you think they want?
 
I'm not entirely, I've done manual work all my life and I'm not sure I count as modern any more. That aside, what do they want, well I can only go on who and what I can see and talk to so I can't claim any universality, but I guess what's wanted is what many have got (or had, pre-crash) only more and better... good and improving standard of living, home & asset ownership, mobility in all its varied forms, shiny consumer stuff, individual path through life, all of it and more and more... without, of course all the crap when it goes pearshaped, redundancy, debt, relationship collapse, MH issues, unhappiness... the moon on a stick with a 99 flake.

which has, tbh, proven slightly more realistic than wanting collective class battles at every opportunity, because most of us know at least a few people who've had a good chunk of the positive, the ones who form the basis of the aspirations of the rest, as well as knowing those who've who've had/have hard times.

what do you think the people you can see from your perch (public sector I think?) want?

edit: rephrased last question: as you are part of them, what do you think they want?
 
As you are part of them what do you think they want?


I want to do something useful and mostly satisfying, have financial/resource security, and with my partner provide our kids with a good basis for the rest of their lives.

It seems to me that there's plenty of useful satisfying work that needs doing. There's more than enough money/resources to go round. Bringing up capable, happy and caring kids is a good enough ambition.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
I'll rephrase if you suggest a better choice of words. it's certainly not intended to be contentious and I'm sorry if it reads that way.

Why not ask the same question you were asked: 'as you are part of them, what do you think they want?' Rather than this oh you can see so far from your privileged protected position approach.
 
I'll rephrase if you suggest a better choice of words. it's certainly not intended to be contentious and I'm sorry if it reads that way.


perch does sort of sound like someone is having it cosy in the pub sec when they are actually under all sorts of attacks on pay, conditions and pensions etc

I'm sure you didn't mean it like that, but you can see how it comes across
 
I want to do something useful and mostly satisfying, have financial/resource security, and with my partner provide our kids with a good basis for the rest of their lives.

It seems to me that there's plenty of useful satisfying work that needs doing. There's more than enough money/resources to go round. Bringing up capable, happy and caring kids is a good enough ambition.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice

I think that's fair but do you not also want, in at least some measure, the security of home/asset ownership, the benefits mobility brings, the occasional new toys? For both yourselves and your children. For those are on offer for you to aspire towards though not necessarily achieve.
 
I'm not entirely, I've done manual work all my life and I'm not sure I count as modern any more. That aside, what do they want, well I can only go on who and what I can see and talk to so I can't claim any universality, but I guess what's wanted is what many have got (or had, pre-crash) only more and better... good and improving standard of living, home & asset ownership, mobility in all its varied forms, shiny consumer stuff, individual path through life, all of it and more and more... without, of course all the crap when it goes pearshaped, redundancy, debt, relationship collapse, MH issues, unhappiness... the moon on a stick with a 99 flake.

which has, tbh, proven slightly more realistic than wanting collective class battles at every opportunity, because most of us know at least a few people who've had a good chunk of the positive, the ones who form the basis of the aspirations of the rest, as well as knowing those who've who've had/have hard times.

what do you think the people you can see from your perch (public sector I think?) want?

well my perch actually involves going round and asking people what they want whether they be residents in social housing or users of services and trying to enable them to change thei rlives for the better whether it be individually or community based. I am also active locally in some community projects.

Most people happiness and contentment, good relationships both individually and in their community,family in good health and if they have kids see them grow ok.. A decent place to live in, meaningful work and enough cash to by some shiny things go on holiday. And when things go wrong the ability to be resilient to draw upon those relationships.

I can't recall advocating collective class battles at every opportunity but I do believe that at times people's own individual problems/aspirations are more likely to be resolved/ less damage done/achieved by collective action than individual solutions.But in a period where neoliberalism has dominated collective experience of sticking together is thinner and thinner. We all hope to win the lottery.
 
well, like I say, no offence intended, simply a turn of phrase. and I didn't think I was claiming it to be a privileged protected position, merely something I know little about never having had more than cursory experience. But if that's the way it reads then sorry.
 
I can't recall advocating collective class battles at every opportunity but I do believe that at times people's own individual problems/aspirations are more likely to be resolved/ less damage done/achieved by collective action than individual solutions.But in a period where neoliberalism has dominated collective experience of sticking together is thinner and thinner. We all hope to win the lottery.
something I aspire to is the language skills of BA, DC, disco or yourself. God, how much I wish. Everything I ever write ties me up in misplaced words and unintended consequences.:( I wasn't for a moment suggesting you'd advocated collective class battles at every opportunity, just keeping the theme of this bit of the thread going, the theme that all socialists should be "Promoting strikes wherever possible".

fwiw I agree with what you've said, of course there are times when collective battles are necessary.
 
Newbie's posts have got me wondering if people can recommend any good reading material on class composition in Britain today.
the trouble is the vast bulk of people who care about class are Marxists of one sort or other, and as Marx predates minor little factors like the working class owning (but absolutely not controlling) the bulk of the economy (via assets, homes, savings, pensions and so on) as well as owning most of the debt, and also dates from a time when class/geography were near certain determinants of future life, all they do is tie themselves in knots of long words few people other than butchers actually understand. Well, I don't, anyway.

If you find something both readable and sensible please let me know.
 
I think that's fair but do you not also want, in at least some measure, the security of home/asset ownership, the benefits mobility brings, the occasional new toys? For both yourselves and your children. For those are on offer for you to aspire towards though not necessarily achieve.


Home and asset ownership are very secondary to security/affordability/appropriateness of tenure; indeed we've got a mortgage because it was the cheapest way of getting a secure and appropriately sized roof over our heads. Mobility I will grab when the chance comes up - through a family connection we were able to go to Rwanda and Uganda earlier this year - but it isn't something I actively pursue; there's loads on my doorstep that I find by turns satisfying and intriguing. As for toys I really have come to realise that on the whole they are ultimately disappointing and I do not need them to have a good sense of myself; that is excluding multiple pairs of running shoes and tents and a gas powered camping fridge...

My quality of life I believe is shaped overwhelmingly by relationships (family, friends and more casual interactions) and work (by no means necessarily paid employment). Many of the ways in which contemporary society is organised/disorganised seem to get in the way of good relationships and good work; capitalism with its alienation and commodification of labour and its production of commodities for exchange value seems key to the poor organisation/disorganisation.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice

p.s. I can see this all coming across a bit smug from someone in my very fortunate position as a well educated, well paid white collar worker...but you did ask.
 
Back
Top Bottom