Jean-Luc
Well-Known Member
Well, but what's your practicable, useful solution to a problem like this when it arises?useless
Well, but what's your practicable, useful solution to a problem like this when it arises?useless
Well, but what's your practicable, useful solution to a problem like this when it arises?
The Facebook Four are set to be expelled again at 2.30.
I suspect you're confusing "debate" and "mutual reacharound".
A lot of SWP fulltimers have come and gone in Sheffield, which one is this?
Actually I wasn't needed in this instance as SpineyNorman had already put Frogwoman straight before me.
<name removed>
Links please, People on SU keep saying Google him, I do and find nothing.In addition to the rumours mentioned upthread, there are also some err... compromising pictures of him floating around the net. He wears comrade delta style specs too.
Just google his name +SWP - you'll find it in a really shitty piece all about the party. I opened the page, but fortunately it took ages to load, giving me enough time to go 'why the fuck do I want to see that?'Links please, People on SU keep saying Google him, I do and find nothing.
It's the same with Seymour's Facebook page, I am so unless I can't even find him on Facebook.
It's all rather odd you quote this directly from socialist unity and then someone quotes you back on the same thread. Makes my brain hurt."News from Hammersmith:I hear Calinicos is calling for the IDOP motions to be “treated with the contempt they deserve” and that calls from the podium for further expulsions are being met with applause.The Facebook Four are set to be expelled again at 2.30.
The SWP CC Faction has clearly gerrymandered today’s event – but they failed to win a majority among the whole membership. They got 512 supporters compared to the IDOP’s latest figure of 540 as of this morning, with people still joining"
Looks ugly, can't believe people can join/stay in this oufit...
Why you ask?Btw, anyone know if MB was on his DC hearing?
For the record, my position is that allegations of rape should not be judged by a party committee but that the complainant should be encouraged to take the matter to the police.
I can see a case for a code of conduct governing non-criminal sexual harassment and for decisions after a member has been convicted, but not for a party committee to judge allegations of rape and serious sexual assault.
It's all rather odd you quote this directly from socialist unity and then someone quotes you back on the same thread. Makes my brain hurt.
Links please, People on SU keep saying Google him, I do and find nothing.
It's the same with Seymour's Facebook page, I am so unless I can't even find him on Facebook.
Seymour's fb status: "disgust, nausea, contempt, rage"
Not really sure what he was expecting to be honest.
Yeah I have now thanks, to be honest I had already found it but didn't think there could be anything real on that page so only give it a very quick look.Don't want to link cos the site's associated with 4chan and comes with all the dodginess that entails, but it's on the SWP entry on encycolpedia dramatica. The article it's a part of, as belboid rightly points out, is one of the least funny 'funny' pages on the entire internet. It's on a par with taffboy's 'funny' EDL site.
Thanks, you've brightened my day.While some may be interested in the emotions he feels when looking in the mirror, I'm more interested in his reaction to the special conference
Dear comrade,
Some of you may have seen an article on the Guardian website today that makes allegations about a disputes committee case in 2011.
The party was approached by the Guardian in advance of the story going out, and we made a statement to them. Only a very small part of it was used, so I am letting you see the whole of it. You will see that we do not accept how the Guardian has framed the issue, and we contest much of the detail.
Charlie Kimber, the party’s national secretary, says, “The SWP strongly contests major elements of this account of the Disputes Committee hearing. The woman concerned brought serious accusations to our attention, we investigated, found against the accused and took prompt action. Those are the facts of this case.
“Fighting for women’s liberation is a central part of the struggle for socialism. We take any issues involving women’s oppression extremely seriously.
“We give a guarantee of confidentiality to everyone involved in such hearings, and therefore we cannot go into full detail. But there was absolutely no cover-up.
“The person accused was removed from the party, and the members of the party heard a full report on the case at our annual conference.
“This report, and a special meeting in the district most affected, brought home the importance of what had happened.
“It is to the credit of our organisation that we investigated this claim thoroughly and took effective action on the basis of the evidence that was presented.”
Pat Stack, the chair of the disputes committee during this case, says, “I simply do not recognise this account of the hearing. For example, we did not ask the questions that are alleged. We are very conscious of how difficult such cases are for the women involved. I am sure that we dealt with the case in a proper way.”
Charlie Kimber adds, “I hope that after the party’s conference we can move forward united. We are going to redouble our fight against this vicious government, against the attacks on jobs, pay, benefits and public services, against the bedroom tax and against privatisation.
“We will continue to work in action with as wide a range of people outside the party as possible. The challenges facing working people across the globe are too urgent for us not to seek to build broader resistance to austerity, fascism and war. And at the centre of that fightback we will continue to argue for a socialist future which abolishes exploitation and tears out the roots of women’s oppression, LGBT oppression, racism and everything else that divides us.”
Solidarity,
Charlie Kimber, SWP national secretary