bolshiebhoy
socialism leinster drink
You are a bumptious little turd aren't you.
If you said anything new I might be forced to Anti Theory.Btw where's CC Apology Boy gone ? Is he awaiting his master's words on the issues I raised ?
Also what do you think about Maxine Bowler's assertion here that the opposition within should have stood a slate against the current DC?
"I urge you to vote for this report that we’ve made, and to be honest, nobody else has come forward to stand for the disputes committee. I do not know, if people are so angry about the way in which the disputes committee have dealt with this then really they should have come forward with an alternative slate."
I've spent weeks explaining patiently where I stand. Think you'll find I rarely lower myself to your sort of level. But this fucker's tone is too infuriating to ignore, self righteous little prig.You seem to be very quick to leap to abuse as an answer to attacks on the SWP cc; does this cause problems at Swindon Labour Party meetings?
You are a bumptious little turd aren't you.
That's Mr Bumptious Turd to you Apology Boy.
I've spent weeks explaining patiently where I stand. Think you'll find I rarely lower myself to your sort of level. But this fucker's tone is too infuriating to ignore, self righteous little prig.
Patiently explain. Where we stand. LolI've spent weeks explaining patiently where I stand.
Top work there, with that chronology, Sihhi. Must have taken ages.
Before Theory - were the Conference delegates provided with copies of the DC report they were required to vote on?
Thank you. Was this normal practice? (Asking delegates to vote on whether or not to accept, unseen, a DC report).No the
No they were not. Infact a sizeable amount of decent folks from outside the large branches turned up at conference with no idea of the shitstorm that was about to descend on them.
Thank you. Was this normal practice? (Asking delegates to vote on whether or not to accept, unseen, a DC report).
Ah, ok, cheers. Not out of the ordinary then, in terms of how they did it. I'm surprised more people didn't abstain though.It was always a verbal report in all the years I was in the SWP. R & F members were not given any prior information about cases before the DC, printed or otherwise.
Honest question here Anti Theory, how long ago did you leave the party? I can understand your anti cc passion given the scale of this crisis and the issues involved. Fair enough. But this dismissing of the party's united front work suggests something a little more politically bitter at work in your head.
Abstention is vaccilation, vaccilation is anti Bolshevik.Ah, ok, cheers. Not out of the ordinary then, in terms of how they did it. I'm surprised more people didn't abstain though.
But this dismissing of the party's united front work suggests something a little more politically bitter at work in your head.
Gotcha.Abstention is vaccilation, vaccilation is anti Bolshevik.
Ah, ok, cheers. Not out of the ordinary then, in terms of how they did it. I'm surprised more people didn't abstain though.
The SWP, so leninist they can tell Lenin were he went wrong.from revleft,
"Last night Bristol SWP effectively voted to censure long-dead Bolshevik Grigory Zinoviev. The motion itself condemned "a model based on Syriza in Greece, the Mensheviks or other Centrist or left reformist tendencies." But the proposer used the opportunity to polemicise against Zinoviev for breaking party discipline and speaking outside the party. Ironically, the Bolsheviks, in whose tradition he was at pains to point out the SWP stand, didn't expel him...
I'm glad that piece of business has finally been resolutely resolved after almost 96 years of uncertainty over whether Zinoviev was in fact a bureaucratic autonomist, creeping feminist, or reformist Menshevik.
Zinoviev has actually become a contentious issue for them. As the party crumbles around they think the way to resolve the crisis is to debate whether Zinoviev should have been expelled in 1917 in order to justify the expulsions being made by the SWP presently.
Yeah, if anyone thinks that organisation isn't worth saving, I wholeheartedly agree"
http://www.revleft.com/vb/censure-z...l?s=220aacc650b83a00bd1dcadf217715aa&t=178358
That reminds me, i was told on sat night that the local organiser has just been removed, and removed for wandering hand syndrome. I can't vouch for it and have only just remembered.from revleft,
"Last night Bristol SWP effectively voted to censure long-dead Bolshevik Grigory Zinoviev. The motion itself condemned "a model based on Syriza in Greece, the Mensheviks or other Centrist or left reformist tendencies." But the proposer used the opportunity to polemicise against Zinoviev for breaking party discipline and speaking outside the party. Ironically, the Bolsheviks, in whose tradition he was at pains to point out the SWP stand, didn't expel him...
I'm glad that piece of business has finally been resolutely resolved after almost 96 years of uncertainty over whether Zinoviev was in fact a bureaucratic autonomist, creeping feminist, or reformist Menshevik.
Zinoviev has actually become a contentious issue for them. As the party crumbles around they think the way to resolve the crisis is to debate whether Zinoviev should have been expelled in 1917 in order to justify the expulsions being made by the SWP presently.
Yeah, if anyone thinks that organisation isn't worth saving, I wholeheartedly agree"
http://www.revleft.com/vb/censure-z...l?s=220aacc650b83a00bd1dcadf217715aa&t=178358
Only just remembered! You trying to say you have more important things to think about?That reminds me, i was told on sat night that the local organiser has just been removed, and removed for wandering hand syndrome. I can't vouch for it and have only just remembered.
It was at a party, cut me some slack!Only just remembered! You trying to say you have more important things to think about?
It was at a party, cut me some slack!
Trotsky wasn't invited
bristol, sometime saturday night...