Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

Marxist-party-.jpg



bristol, sometime saturday night...

I hate that T shirt but I love Fidel's trackie top. I'm conflicted. :confused:
 
This is pretty much how I see it.Perhaps something in the irrelevant world of students and internet blogs but that is about it

I suspect that most left wing trade unionists who know or care about the SWP's dispute will be negatively disposed towards the leadership's handling of the row, but that will only be a tiny number of people in the first place. And even the most outraged will have more sense than to bring it up at some union branch meeting so as to have a pop at some SWP trade unionist.
 
Right BT if we can lower the level of abuse a wee bit I'm sure that'd be appreciated all round. So are you saying the united front work is all going to be undone by this crisis and that nobody will work with swpers going forward? Or are you one of those who thinks the united front work was all a sham all along? Not trying to goad you with this question just trying to understand where exactly you're coming from.
Poor bolshie, you do so much want to believe that all the SWPers disgusted at a rape cover up are just bad trots using it as an excuse.
 
Belboid, 39thStep and Nigel I. Do you completely discount that this may have filtered through to the wider rank and file membership of the TUs, who might be asking questions of any SWP reps?
 
Poor bolshie, you do so much want to believe that all the SWPers disgusted at a rape cover up are just bad trots using it as an excuse.
No I completely understand the indignation on the assumption you buy the coverup hypothesis. But how people explain what's happened to their party after that initial reaction also interests me. Some see it as a mistake that the cc are too thick headed to correct. Some see it as a symptom of a degenerated model of dem cen. Some blame the alleged macho sexism inherent in the left. And some throw the whole baby out with the bath water and blame Leninism per se. The moral indignation matters, course it does. But the broader political explanation people latch on to matters too. And five or ten years from now it's that explanation which will determine what sort of politics people will end up practising, in,or out of the party they feel has let them down.
 
Belboid, 39thStep and Nigel I. Do you completely discount that this may have filtered through to the wider rank and file membership of the TUs, who might be asking questions of any SWP reps?

I wouldn't discount the latter at all but I think the notion of the SWP becoming toxic through this is somewhat overrated.It will be used as a stick every now and again by those in the union bureaucracy to beat them with but I think the SWP will produce a consistent line which will be that they investigated the complaint, the complainant did not want the police involved , that the committee that investigated the compliant had people from appropriate victim centred backgrounds and that they did not find the case proven.The party takes allegations like these seriously and is committed to fighting sexism in all its aspects.

The only thing that would blow this off course would be if the victim left the SWP because of this and went public.

The democratic centralism/real meaning of lennism debate is to be honest irrelevant to the wider rank and file of TUs.

Btw I came across an Afed case in Sheffield of sexual harassment in which the case was also not referred to the Police for investigation,
 
No I completely understand the indignation on the assumption you buy the coverup hypothesis. But how people explain what's happened to their party after that initial reaction also interests me. Some see it as a mistake that the cc are too thick headed to correct. Some see it as a symptom of a degenerated model of dem cen. Some blame the alleged macho sexism inherent in the left. And some throw the whole baby out with the bath water and blame Leninism per se. The moral indignation matters, course it does. But the broader political explanation people latch on to matters too. And five or ten years from now it's that explanation which will determine what sort of politics people will end up practising, in,or out of the party they feel has let them down.
I tend to be on the side of mistake and a thick headed CC rather than a cover up. I don't have time for a long post, maybe tonight, but I have always said the roots of the crises are political.
 
Quite obvious that they decided to take their own action and not go down that route.
No, it's not. A statement of their own action so far, together with setting out what "Sam" has to do next as a first step - doesn't imply or infer that this is all that has or will happen.
 
No, it's not. A statement of their own action so far, together with setting out what "Sam" has to do next as a first step - doesn't imply or infer that this is all that has or will happen.

Sam wouldn't be doing any such thing if the case was going to court!

Anyway you read it the way you want to.The only thing that will settle it is if we get someone from Afed on here to say what happened.
 
Sam wouldn't be doing any such thing if the case was going to court!

Anyway you read it the way you want to.The only thing that will settle it is if we get someone from Afed on here to say what happened.

I agree that Sam wouldn't be doing any such thing if the case was going to court. However you can't infer from that, that the parties chose not to involve the police. They may not have done - but you don't know.

So I don't know why you're providing this as an example of "an Afed case in Sheffield of sexual harassment in which the case was also not referred to the Police for investigation".

Edit: if what you are trying to get to, is that anarchist organisations preclude reporting to the police in how they deal with things; and from that draw some comparison with how the SWP dealt with this rape complaint ... Why don't you just ask AFED/ the SOLFED for details on how they go about dealing with sexual misconduct complaints?
 
I agree that Sam wouldn't be doing any such thing if the case was going to court. However you can't infer from that, that the parties chose not to involve the police. They may not have done - but you don't know.

So I don't know why you're providing this as an example of "an Afed case in Sheffield of sexual harassment in which the case was also not referred to the Police for investigation".

Edit: if what you are trying to get to, is that anarchist organisations preclude reporting to the police in how they deal with things; and from that draw some comparison with how the SWP dealt with this rape complaint ... Why don't you just ask AFED/ the SOLFED for details on how they go about dealing with sexual misconduct complaints?

Quite clear to me that the inference is that they didn't although I do agree with you that the statement isn't as transparent as it should be. Are you around Solfed/Afed? perhaps you could use your contacts to find out?
 
Quite clear to me that the inference is that they didn't although I do agree with you that the statement isn't as transparent as it should be. Are you around Solfed/Afed? perhaps you could use your contacts to find out?
I didn't say the statement isn't as transparent as it should be, so there's no need to agree with what I didn't say.

I have no dealings with AFED but sometimes I'm "around" people from the SOLFED. I'm happy to email the SOLFED to see if they want to answer any queries; particularly I suppose in comparison to how the SWP have dealt with this rape complaint as that's the context you've raised it in.
 
Quite clear to me that the inference is that they didn't although I do agree with you that the statement isn't as transparent as it should be. Are you around Solfed/Afed? perhaps you could use your contacts to find out?
The inference is quite clear but my conclusion is that despite the ready availability of af and sf contact details you haven't contacted them to enquire into their handling of the situations you've identified. If you are as concerned as you affect to be this is something of a surprise.
 
I didn't say the statement isn't as transparent as it should be, so there's no need to agree with what I didn't say.

I have no dealings with AFED but sometimes I'm "around" people from the SOLFED. I'm happy to email the SOLFED to see if they want to answer any queries; particularly I suppose in comparison to how the SWP have dealt with this rape complaint as that's the context you've raised it in.

if you could please. I am particularly interested in organisations who have ( for what ever reason) have not chosen to use the bourgeois justice system but have dealt with these things internally.
 
The inference is quite clear but my conclusion is that despite the ready availability of af and sf contact details you haven't contacted them to enquire into their handling of the situations you've identified. If you are as concerned as you affect to be this is something of a surprise.


Not concerned Pickmans, interested. The left and the anarchist scene can't be immune to this sort of behaviour but I am interested in how they are dealt with.
 
Back
Top Bottom