barney_pig
Po-cha-na-quar-hip
Just remembered this
http://stalinsdiary.wordpress.com/
http://stalinsdiary.wordpress.com/
bristol, sometime saturday night...
Well in fairness trots have been doing that since the democratic dictatorship of the proletariat and the peasantry 'mistake' we corrected for Lenin.The SWP, so leninist they can tell Lenin were he went wrong.
May I ask your party allegiances?
Is that link broken? Mind you doesn't sound worth fixingAnyway one for BB, apparently their is some bad stuff about CM but I couldn't manage to actually read it, I'd pretty much given up by the end of the first sentence.
it wont 'pan out' at all. Absolutely nothing will happen.
This is pretty much how I see it.Perhaps something in the irrelevant world of students and internet blogs but that is about it
The home for just about anything EX. Ex-WRP, ex-SWP, ex-IMG, ex-anarchists. EX-it!
Yup. This is the start of something bigLast night 25 comrades – some from left organisations and some individuals met at Conway Hall in central London to continue the discussion around the recomposition of the left.
Poor bolshie, you do so much want to believe that all the SWPers disgusted at a rape cover up are just bad trots using it as an excuse.Right BT if we can lower the level of abuse a wee bit I'm sure that'd be appreciated all round. So are you saying the united front work is all going to be undone by this crisis and that nobody will work with swpers going forward? Or are you one of those who thinks the united front work was all a sham all along? Not trying to goad you with this question just trying to understand where exactly you're coming from.
No I completely understand the indignation on the assumption you buy the coverup hypothesis. But how people explain what's happened to their party after that initial reaction also interests me. Some see it as a mistake that the cc are too thick headed to correct. Some see it as a symptom of a degenerated model of dem cen. Some blame the alleged macho sexism inherent in the left. And some throw the whole baby out with the bath water and blame Leninism per se. The moral indignation matters, course it does. But the broader political explanation people latch on to matters too. And five or ten years from now it's that explanation which will determine what sort of politics people will end up practising, in,or out of the party they feel has let them down.Poor bolshie, you do so much want to believe that all the SWPers disgusted at a rape cover up are just bad trots using it as an excuse.
Looks like the Page has been taken down, I found the link on SU (which should tell you something) and the link there is not working either.Is that link broken? Mind you doesn't sound worth fixing
Petitioning outside the centre? Invaded a CC meeting waving flags around?Mention on facebook of "London SWSS" doing something oppositional earlier. Very vague as to what it was.
Belboid, 39thStep and Nigel I. Do you completely discount that this may have filtered through to the wider rank and file membership of the TUs, who might be asking questions of any SWP reps?
I tend to be on the side of mistake and a thick headed CC rather than a cover up. I don't have time for a long post, maybe tonight, but I have always said the roots of the crises are political.No I completely understand the indignation on the assumption you buy the coverup hypothesis. But how people explain what's happened to their party after that initial reaction also interests me. Some see it as a mistake that the cc are too thick headed to correct. Some see it as a symptom of a degenerated model of dem cen. Some blame the alleged macho sexism inherent in the left. And some throw the whole baby out with the bath water and blame Leninism per se. The moral indignation matters, course it does. But the broader political explanation people latch on to matters too. And five or ten years from now it's that explanation which will determine what sort of politics people will end up practising, in,or out of the party they feel has let them down.
Let's hear about this AFED case then!
Where does it say anything about choosing to ignore the bourgeois legal system?This is what I came across. I don't know anything else about it and I am not suggesting any similarities except for the fact that for what ever reason they chose to ignore the bourgeois legal system ( which I have nothing against in principle providing all parties agree)
http://www.afed.org.uk/blog/society...he-disassociation-of-sam-sheffield-group.html
Where does it say anything about choosing to ignore the bourgeois legal system?
No, it's not. A statement of their own action so far, together with setting out what "Sam" has to do next as a first step - doesn't imply or infer that this is all that has or will happen.Quite obvious that they decided to take their own action and not go down that route.
No, it's not. A statement of their own action so far, together with setting out what "Sam" has to do next as a first step - doesn't imply or infer that this is all that has or will happen.
Sam wouldn't be doing any such thing if the case was going to court!
Anyway you read it the way you want to.The only thing that will settle it is if we get someone from Afed on here to say what happened.
I agree that Sam wouldn't be doing any such thing if the case was going to court. However you can't infer from that, that the parties chose not to involve the police. They may not have done - but you don't know.
So I don't know why you're providing this as an example of "an Afed case in Sheffield of sexual harassment in which the case was also not referred to the Police for investigation".
Edit: if what you are trying to get to, is that anarchist organisations preclude reporting to the police in how they deal with things; and from that draw some comparison with how the SWP dealt with this rape complaint ... Why don't you just ask AFED/ the SOLFED for details on how they go about dealing with sexual misconduct complaints?
I didn't say the statement isn't as transparent as it should be, so there's no need to agree with what I didn't say.Quite clear to me that the inference is that they didn't although I do agree with you that the statement isn't as transparent as it should be. Are you around Solfed/Afed? perhaps you could use your contacts to find out?
The inference is quite clear but my conclusion is that despite the ready availability of af and sf contact details you haven't contacted them to enquire into their handling of the situations you've identified. If you are as concerned as you affect to be this is something of a surprise.Quite clear to me that the inference is that they didn't although I do agree with you that the statement isn't as transparent as it should be. Are you around Solfed/Afed? perhaps you could use your contacts to find out?
I didn't say the statement isn't as transparent as it should be, so there's no need to agree with what I didn't say.
I have no dealings with AFED but sometimes I'm "around" people from the SOLFED. I'm happy to email the SOLFED to see if they want to answer any queries; particularly I suppose in comparison to how the SWP have dealt with this rape complaint as that's the context you've raised it in.
The inference is quite clear but my conclusion is that despite the ready availability of af and sf contact details you haven't contacted them to enquire into their handling of the situations you've identified. If you are as concerned as you affect to be this is something of a surprise.