danny la rouge
I have a cheese grater in the dishwasher.
Not unless we’re very, very, very sure.Put me down
Not unless we’re very, very, very sure.Put me down
I would side with Cromwell against King Charles I.He was a massive cunt too.
On the contrary, we should fear the state apparatus and that they may kill us. It may not seem likely right now, but a while back in Northern Ireland it was not exactly unheard of. It also is more than a reasonable fear in Russia, Belarus, China, Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Eritrea, Myanmar, Syria, Yemen etc etcSome people argue that the killing of a police officer is in a different category to the killing of a civilian, because an attack on those who maintain order is a threat to all of us. They call for execution to be introduced as the penalty for murder of police officers.
A murder committed by a police officer in the course of his duties, it could be argued, is worse than other murders, as it is a threat to us all. We should not go in fear that members of the state apparatus may kill us. Therefore, perhaps execution should be brought in as a punishment for members of the police and armed forces who murder members of the public.
Did you read my second paragraph?On the contrary, we should fear the state apparatus and that they may kill us. It may not seem likely right now, but a while back in Northern Ireland it was not exactly unheard of. It also is more than a reasonable fear in Russia, Belarus, China, Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Eritrea, Myanmar, Syria, Yemen etc etc
I did and I replied to it. Particularly the second sentence of said paragraph.Did you read my second paragraph?
But by who and why? Not necessarily for that specifically but seems a bad thing to have as precedent. I find it extremely difficult to imagine anyone killing anyone not in self defence doesn't have fucked up judgement on the basis they killed someone. That seems so fucked up I can't imagine it.
I'm no fucking liberalThis poll confirms something that we all really know of course that opinions on Urban are FAR to the liberal end of the scale and not representative of the general public.
If killer cops and soldiers were executed, then perhaps we would have less reason to fear being killed by agents of the state.I did and I replied to it. Particularly the second sentence of said paragraph.
DP should have been abolished in 1948. A bill was passed in the House of Commons. Fucking House of Lords blocked it. Cunts who never usually attended travelled down to London from their country piles to make sure it didn't happen. This country had the DP for nearly 20 years longer than it shoud have.Out of interest, did anyone remember who was around then or experience the last hanging in the UK in 1964 or the Abolition of Death Penalty Act 1965?
Was reading up on it and it mentioned been brought about by the 'changing attitudes' towards the use of the death penalty.
Be fascinating to hear anyone who has recollections of this first hand.
Ah I did not know that. I see it was only suspended in 1965 and not abolished officially until 1969!DP should have been abolished in 1948. A bill was passed in the House of Commons. Fucking House of Lords blocked it. This country had the DP for nearly 20 years longer than it shoud have.
Yes, in 48, it was 5-year suspension initially, with the intention to follow up with abolition. That's often how abolition goes. Lords blocked the suspension.Ah I did not know that. I see it was only suspended in 1965 and not abolished officially until 1969!
It's actually mad to think what would have become of the 2 last people to be executed or anyone for that matter between 1948-64.
I've got down the rabbit hole now as just realised that all this was only for murder, it remained for other crimes (several of them) until acts of the entire 1990's!
Not read the thread but I've refined my own opinion on the death penalty.
Everyone should be asked 'do you believe the death penalty works?' and their answers recorded. Then, if someone is accused of a crime deserving of the death penalty, those believing it works should get it and those not believing it works shouldn't get it.
I now consider this foolproof
Yes but never likely to be used. A sop to those who argued that different rules applied in times of war. Again, this is a common phenomenon around the world. Many countries have gone through, or are still in the process of going through, similar stages.I've got down the rabbit hole now as just realised that all this was only for murder, it remained for other crimes (several of them) until acts of the entire 1990's!
I actually understand reading how you've put it, it's just sad and upsetting to think one human being can do these things to another and there's nothing you can do about itWhatever you do, it doesn't bring the children back. You keep the world safe from him. If necessary you do that until he dies. When he dies, you bury/cremate the body.
There is no justice in that sense. Whatever you do to Cooke does not undo what he did. Someone who didn't deserve to die died. The idea that you can somehow square the justice circle on that is a weird one, imo. You can't. The unfair thing cannot be undone.
It's incredibly sad, yes. I just don't see how killing Cooke makes it any less sad.I actually understand reading how you've put it, it's just sad and upsetting to think one human being can do these things to another and there's nothing you can do about it
Yes.'let him have it'?