Well "refusal to move on" implies that all attempts of nicely persuading them to leave have been exhausted, so the chances are that things will have escalated to a situation where physical violence (or at least a precieved threat of it) is imminent.
Also you do like to tell me what I do and don't know.
none of which suggest you're mentally deficient. go to specsavers to do with mental capacity? i think not: especially when you say you couldn't see the post i referred to. and if you haven't really thought matters through that means you haven't, not you can't. as for having a clue, once more nothing to do with mental capacity and all to do with your knowledge of the subject you comment on.
Okay, quit nit-picking, I am aware it's not a "right" in the sense the Universal Deceleration of Human Rights, although having said that, this happens to be Article 1:
declaration. it neither speeds up nor slows down. the udhr may lay that down but there's still not right not to be venemously abused.
Have corrected accordingly.
So you don't regret and wouldn't like to apologise for not coming to blows with the SWP?
six weeks down the line your inability to understand my post still shocks.
Yeh too late to do anything much this year plus I suspect any event this year would be seen by some people as an opportunity to continue last year's debacle
Oh I understood it
they'll be lucky if they only get it in the neck
i think it's only possible to tag five people in a post or i'd have done you too
Will be going along, be good to see you and urbs and especially chilango if yoy make it
I'm awol in Snowdonia the week leading up to it, but should be back.
Be interesting to see to what extent the 'trans v terfs' battle plays out - or doesn't - in these venues. I think it will also be interesting if/when the London event runs again how the organisers approach the issue. I get the impression over the years there have been a few exclusions - conspiraloons, weird sects on the pavement outside, but haven't table/room bookings been pretty much open to anyone who self defines as anarco-ish? Would organisers be forced to come up with statements limiting the groups who can book? Would there be pre-negotiations between groups to avoid similar battles?
All very sad really, makes you appreciate the efforts the organisers have put in over the years.
given what happened at millwall i suppose there'll be lot more er 'debate' on this issue to come.Be interesting to see to what extent the 'trans v terfs' battle plays out - or doesn't - in these venues. I think it will also be interesting if/when the London event runs again how the organisers approach the issue. I get the impression over the years there have been a few exclusions - conspiraloons, weird sects on the pavement outside, but haven't table/room bookings been pretty much open to anyone who self defines as anarco-ish? Would organisers be forced to come up with statements limiting the groups who can book? Would there be pre-negotiations between groups to avoid similar battles?
None of that is put forward as a 'solution'. Quite the opposite in fact - I can't really see how any kind of 'planning' could stop these toxic battles happening again.
