I also aspire to "champagne socialist".
I wasn’t accusing you of that.
I also aspire to "champagne socialist".
No, but if I'm virtue signalling I might as well go the whole hog.I wasn’t accusing you of that.
Yes, they say they have trans friends even. I suspect they are equivocating and some of them do in fact want to stir up hatreds. Do your "suspect" and my "suspect" cancel each other out?
No. They demonstrate perfectly that it's a grey area. In your opinion, in such grey areas, would you rather see unpalatable opinions criminalised, or free speech permitted?
So far the only people who have called the police were the leafleters.
I don't have to have a preference, thanks.They're the ones who've been assaulted. But, that wasn't the question. What would you prefer?
I don't have to have a preference, thanks.
That's fine. Unlike the organisers of the you have the luxury of being able to sit on the fence.
OK, even if I insert "bookfair" in that sentence you still aren't making a great deal of sense.
Ok. We can pretend that if you like.
Perhaps you could clearly state your position then? At the moment it just seems you're playing "Socratic shits and giggles" with a string of questions that make me think you're about to try and prove the existence of God.
That the leaflet is not 'hate speech' as you claimed. And that, as such, the organisers of the bookfair behaved reasonably on the day, in the circumstances. And that the criticism of them is unjustified. And that such criticism has harmed the anarchist (and broader radical left) movement.
What's yours?
Oh dearDo you think it is valid to direct any attention to the leaflets which caused the controversy, or not?
Indeed, have you even read the material in question?
OK, even if I insert "bookfair" in that sentence you still aren't making a great deal of sense.
Fair enough. I'd go with "leaflet is hate speech", "leafleteers were trolling and have admitted as much elsewhere", "the organisers fucked up in their response because of understandable loyalty to an old colleague", and I'd actually agree with your very last statement but I'd broaden it to "the entire incident has harmed..."
Do you think it is valid to direct any attention to the leaflets which caused the controversy, or not?
Indeed, have you even read the material in question?
Oh dear
It is better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than pipe up and prove yourself one, as you have here
FYI - the leaflets did not cause the controversy
You’re a prick. You only went because it was literally on your doorstep and the pub over the road didn’t suit your middle class tastes so you advised against that to fellow nobheads.
Are the drinks not good enough rich! or is it the clientele you don’t like?
The leaflets symptoms of an ongoing controversy, sweetlingSomeone who asserts that the content of the leaflets which sparked this controversy are not worth examining that would make for a damn fine specimen of a complete fool.
And all the anarchists who supped thereYou've taken the pub comment to heart. Since it's under discussion, I don't particularly like any of the beer they serve, and the only person I know who drinks there is the last landlord of my local, now long closed.
You've taken the pub comment to heart. Since it's under discussion, I don't particularly like any of the beer they serve, and the only person I know who drinks there is the last landlord of my local, now long closed.
Ok. Leaving aside that those statements turn on the question of what is 'hate speech', which you've declined to clearly define, what response would you have liked from the organisers? To what extent ought they to police the expression of unpopular opinions?
Probably. You’re taking some bullshit middle class political position which is making me think of your other comments and what they mean in that context.
And all the anarchists who supped there
I'm curious as to why my position is bullshit?
What’s your position on class politics? Rather than this crap you’re going on about.
I wasn't talking about class politics and haven't engaged with that at all here and don't particularly intend to.
I was talking about the disruption of the bookfair by a group distributing leaflets that were expected to be disruptive, and the fallout from that.