Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

[Sat 28th Oct 2017] London Anarchist Bookfair (London)

Yes, they say they have trans friends even. I suspect they are equivocating and some of them do in fact want to stir up hatreds. Do your "suspect" and my "suspect" cancel each other out?

No. They demonstrate perfectly that it's a grey area. In your opinion, in such grey areas, would you rather see unpalatable opinions criminalised, or free speech permitted?
 
No. They demonstrate perfectly that it's a grey area. In your opinion, in such grey areas, would you rather see unpalatable opinions criminalised, or free speech permitted?

So far the only people who have called the police were the leafleters.
 
Ok. We can pretend that if you like.

Perhaps you could clearly state your position then? At the moment it just seems you're playing "Socratic shits and giggles" with a string of questions that make me think you're about to try and prove the existence of God.
 
Perhaps you could clearly state your position then? At the moment it just seems you're playing "Socratic shits and giggles" with a string of questions that make me think you're about to try and prove the existence of God.

That the leaflet is not 'hate speech' as you claimed. And that, as such, the organisers of the bookfair behaved reasonably on the day, in the circumstances. And that the criticism of them is unjustified. And that such criticism has harmed the anarchist (and broader radical left) movement.

What's yours?
 
That the leaflet is not 'hate speech' as you claimed. And that, as such, the organisers of the bookfair behaved reasonably on the day, in the circumstances. And that the criticism of them is unjustified. And that such criticism has harmed the anarchist (and broader radical left) movement.

What's yours?

Fair enough. I'd go with "leaflet is hate speech", "leafleteers were trolling and have admitted as much elsewhere", "the organisers fucked up in their response because of understandable loyalty to an old colleague", and I'd actually agree with your very last statement but I'd broaden it to "the entire incident has harmed..."
 
Do you think it is valid to direct any attention to the leaflets which caused the controversy, or not?

Indeed, have you even read the material in question?
Oh dear

It is better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than pipe up and prove yourself one, as you have here

FYI - the leaflets did not cause the controversy
 
OK, even if I insert "bookfair" in that sentence you still aren't making a great deal of sense.

You’re a prick. You only went because it was literally on your doorstep and the pub over the road didn’t suit your middle class tastes so you advised against that to fellow nobheads.
 
Fair enough. I'd go with "leaflet is hate speech", "leafleteers were trolling and have admitted as much elsewhere", "the organisers fucked up in their response because of understandable loyalty to an old colleague", and I'd actually agree with your very last statement but I'd broaden it to "the entire incident has harmed..."

Ok. Leaving aside that those statements turn on the question of what is 'hate speech', which you've declined to clearly define, what response would you have liked from the organisers? To what extent ought they to police the expression of unpopular opinions?
 
Do you think it is valid to direct any attention to the leaflets which caused the controversy, or not?

Indeed, have you even read the material in question?

Oh dear

It is better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than pipe up and prove yourself one, as you have here

FYI - the leaflets did not cause the controversy

Someone who asserts that the content of the leaflets which sparked this controversy are not worth examining that would make for a damn fine specimen of a complete fool.
 
Are the drinks not good enough rich! or is it the clientele you don’t like?

You've taken the pub comment to heart. Since it's under discussion, I don't particularly like any of the beer they serve, and the only person I know who drinks there is the last landlord of my local, now long closed.
 
You've taken the pub comment to heart. Since it's under discussion, I don't particularly like any of the beer they serve, and the only person I know who drinks there is the last landlord of my local, now long closed.

Probably. You’re taking some bullshit middle class political position which is making me think of your other comments and what they mean in that context.
 
Ok. Leaving aside that those statements turn on the question of what is 'hate speech', which you've declined to clearly define, what response would you have liked from the organisers? To what extent ought they to police the expression of unpopular opinions?

I have no particular view on what the BF organisers should or shouldn't have done in terms of managing their event. Hence not joining in that part of the discussion.

I have discovered I have a strong view on people who distribute what I believe is hate speech. I'm still somewhat surprised by the amount of ignoring the leaflet content that's going on.
 
What’s your position on class politics? Rather than this crap you’re going on about.

I wasn't talking about class politics and haven't engaged with that at all here and don't particularly intend to.

I was talking about the disruption of the bookfair by a group distributing leaflets that were expected to be disruptive, and the fallout from that.
 
I wasn't talking about class politics and haven't engaged with that at all here and don't particularly intend to.

I was talking about the disruption of the bookfair by a group distributing leaflets that were expected to be disruptive, and the fallout from that.

Why were you at the book fair then if you have no position on class politics?
Because it’s those people who have thrown it under a bus. And you should fuck off as far as I’m concerned.
 
Back
Top Bottom