It might not be off the table but it gets harder to do the longer he leaves it given the timescale in turning grumpy Russian teens into bloodthirsty orcs.I think it would be an error to think that just because he's not mentioned it today, that some kind of full/partial mobilisation, or taking Russia to a full war footing is off the table.
That said, if he was to go down that road, he might have 700,000+ plus men to throw into battle but what tanks has he got to give them, what Artillery has he got to give them, what logistics has he got to keep them fed?
Russia keeps a huge number of tanks et al in storage, but this is stuff from the 60's and 70's, and stuff that didn't get the upgrades through the 80's, 90's, and so on - there's the question about whether much of it will even start with batteries that haven't been turned over in 20+ years, then there's what state will the ammunition be in.
This doesn't touch what will happen to them when the Ukrainians start putting Javelins through them...
The caveat to this is that the Red Army of WWII, which our friend apparently reveres, effectively drowned the German Army is Russian blood. Losses of 10-1 were acceptable to Uncle Joe because he could afford the 10, but Hitler couldn't afford the 1.
Perhaps Vlad thinks he can afford to loose 3,000 tanks and their crews because he'll have 3,000 left, but that once the Ukrainians destroy 3,000 tanks, they'll have run out of missiles for tgre next wave....
judging from those pictures he took it rather better than british politicians might have doneSomeone needs a trip to Sketchleys...
View attachment 321866View attachment 321867View attachment 321868View attachment 321869
That is the problem, stockpiles will be running low, can enough be produced fast enough to keep knocking out Russian tanks? Very possibly not.I think it would be an error to think that just because he's not mentioned it today, that some kind of full/partial mobilisation, or taking Russia to a full war footing is off the table.
That said, if he was to go down that road, he might have 700,000+ plus men to throw into battle but what tanks has he got to give them, what Artillery has he got to give them, what logistics has he got to keep them fed?
Russia keeps a huge number of tanks et al in storage, but this is stuff from the 60's and 70's, and stuff that didn't get the upgrades through the 80's, 90's, and so on - there's the question about whether much of it will even start with batteries that haven't been turned over in 20+ years, then there's what state will the ammunition be in.
This doesn't touch what will happen to them when the Ukrainians start putting Javelins through them...
The caveat to this is that the Red Army of WWII, which our friend apparently reveres, effectively drowned the German Army is Russian blood. Losses of 10-1 were acceptable to Uncle Joe because he could afford the 10, but Hitler couldn't afford the 1.
Perhaps Vlad thinks he can afford to loose 3,000 tanks and their crews because he'll have 3,000 left, but that once the Ukrainians destroy 3,000 tanks, they'll have run out of missiles for tgre next wave....
The phrase "winning to death" is regularly used to describe the Germans' campaign in Ukraine in WWII, but it is beginning to look as if it could apply equally to the Russian army in 2022.I think it would be an error to think that just because he's not mentioned it today, that some kind of full/partial mobilisation, or taking Russia to a full war footing is off the table.
That said, if he was to go down that road, he might have 700,000+ plus men to throw into battle but what tanks has he got to give them, what Artillery has he got to give them, what logistics has he got to keep them fed?
Russia keeps a huge number of tanks et al in storage, but this is stuff from the 60's and 70's, and stuff that didn't get the upgrades through the 80's, 90's, and so on - there's the question about whether much of it will even start with batteries that haven't been turned over in 20+ years, then there's what state will the ammunition be in.
This doesn't touch what will happen to them when the Ukrainians start putting Javelins through them...
The caveat to this is that the Red Army of WWII, which our friend apparently reveres, effectively drowned the German Army is Russian blood. Losses of 10-1 were acceptable to Uncle Joe because he could afford the 10, but Hitler couldn't afford the 1.
Perhaps Vlad thinks he can afford to loose 3,000 tanks and their crews because he'll have 3,000 left, but that once the Ukrainians destroy 3,000 tanks, they'll have run out of missiles for tgre next wave....
It's also Victory Day in Ukraine. Here's Zelensky's speech marking the occasion
either that or everything he does is playing a partWhat's interesting about this is that the vibe of the speech is very similar to the way his character in "Servant Of The People" would invoke the sayings of philosophical/historical figures. Life, imitating art, imitating life, imitating art. All very matryoshka
True of some kit, but worth remember other kit which ain't bad only ended up starting to be supplied quite late on cos it had German components and the Germans did nt want any disruption to their then policy of appease the RussuandThat is the problem, stockpiles will be running low, can enough be produced fast enough to keep knocking out Russian tanks? Very possibly not.
Tbf he did write it. He wasn't just an actorWhat's interesting about this is that the vibe of the speech is very similar to the way his character in "Servant Of The People" would invoke the sayings of philosophical/historical figures. Life, imitating art, imitating life, imitating art. All very matryoshka
The phrase "winning to death" is regularly used to describe the Germans' campaign in Ukraine in WWII, but it is beginning to look as if it could apply equally to the Russian army in 2022.
ETA: and it was the same logistical fuckups, and overreach of aims, that did for the Nazi forces...
Going by various info sources, the Russians appear to have about 2500 operational tanks and of those around 2000 are 'combat ready'. The eye-watering 12,000-20,000 tanks figure bandied around in some publications and websites includes tanks that are in storage to be either brought back into service or stripped for parts. I saw a video that discusses this issue, I'm not sure how accurate it is but it sounds reasonable:I think it would be an error to think that just because he's not mentioned it today, that some kind of full/partial mobilisation, or taking Russia to a full war footing is off the table.
That said, if he was to go down that road, he might have 700,000+ plus men to throw into battle but what tanks has he got to give them, what Artillery has he got to give them, what logistics has he got to keep them fed?
Russia keeps a huge number of tanks et al in storage, but this is stuff from the 60's and 70's, and stuff that didn't get the upgrades through the 80's, 90's, and so on - there's the question about whether much of it will even start with batteries that haven't been turned over in 20+ years, then there's what state will the ammunition be in.
This doesn't touch what will happen to them when the Ukrainians start putting Javelins through them...
The caveat to this is that the Red Army of WWII, which our friend apparently reveres, effectively drowned the German Army is Russian blood. Losses of 10-1 were acceptable to Uncle Joe because he could afford the 10, but Hitler couldn't afford the 1.
Perhaps Vlad thinks he can afford to loose 3,000 tanks and their crews because he'll have 3,000 left, but that once the Ukrainians destroy 3,000 tanks, they'll have run out of missiles for tgre next wave....
Not sure about that bit - yes, there was a confusion of aims (especially in 1941 and 1942) and yes the logistical supply broke down (under a lot of pressure) but it was the decision to invade that did for them. Even at the time there was widespread concern at whether it could be done and, looking back at it now, it was probably almost impossible given all the other factors (how little the Germans actually understood of what was happening further into the Soviet Union for a start, plus the extermination campaigns resulting in such widespread and serious resistance, and of course the support given by the other Allies).
Compared to that decision, I don't think this invasion is anywhere near as poorly thought out. I mean, there is still a relatively good chance of a victory especially if the limit is the Donbas.
The logistics just weren't up to it - very poor standardisation of vehicles, and a logistics and maintenance chain that couldn't hope to keep up with the necessary supply of spare parts and consumables for such a rag-tag collection of stuff. And people at the lower levels, and to some extent all the way up to OKW level...but nobody wanted to actually tell Hitler that they couldn't deliver on what he was expecting them to do.Not sure about that bit - yes, there was a confusion of aims (especially in 1941 and 1942) and yes the logistical supply broke down (under a lot of pressure) but it was the decision to invade that did for them. Even at the time there was widespread concern at whether it could be done and, looking back at it now, it was probably almost impossible given all the other factors (how little the Germans actually understood of what was happening further into the Soviet Union for a start, plus the extermination campaigns resulting in such widespread and serious resistance, and of course the support given by the other Allies).
Compared to that decision, I don't think this invasion is anywhere near as poorly thought out. I mean, there is still a relatively good chance of a victory especially if the limit is the Donbas.
“Ordinary people are dying, peaceful women and children are dying in Ukraine. Given the rhetoric that we have seen, this isn’t going to stop. We couldn’t accept this any longer. This was the only right thing we could do.”
Polyakov, who works as a business reporter at Lenta, said he and his colleague Alexandra Miroshnikova published more than 40 articles critical of the Kremlin and its actions in Ukraine. The articles have since been taken down, but can be accessed through a web archive tool.
Lenta, one of the largest sites in the country with more than 200 million monthly visitors, has been part of the relentless propaganda machine used to justify Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Really? Barbarsossa pushed the Russian all the way back to Moscow and past Kiev in its first four months and the Russians suffered huge losses - they could easily have lost. They had a bit of luck in that they learnt that Japan had no plans to attack so were able to redeploy their far eastern forces -(some of their best troops led by their best general - Zhukov) just in time to save Moscow. So yeah - the Germans could have won.
Yes it was a gamble, they were overconfident and made serious errors - didnt think they need winter clothing and they underestimated the reliance of the USSR and its military strength - but in terms of combat effectiveness, logistics, planning, tactics, equipment - the Germans were on their game. Putin's assault on Ukraine has been a shambles from the start. Jaw dropping ineptitude and incompetence at every level.
Going by various info sources, the Russians appear to have about 2500 operational tanks and of those around 2000 are 'combat ready'. The eye-watering 12,000-20,000 tanks figure bandied around in some publications and websites includes tanks that are in storage to be either brought back into service or stripped for parts. I saw a video that discusses this issue, I'm not sure how accurate it is but it sounds reasonable:
In the linked video* the producer analysed tons of satellite images, trawled russian military forums, reviewed treaty agreements going back a couple of decades and looked for the locations of reserve bases across Russia to see what stored armour was visible. Here's a summary for those who don't have the time to watch it:
The conclusion was that at least 30% of Russia's stock of tanks are permanently fucked beyond use and of the remaining ones in storage, most would take too long to get back into operational use or are too obsolete to be effective.
- Of the bases featured, around 25-50% of the stored vehicles were assessed to be useable with the remaining tanks being mostly inoperative.
- Based on what the video content has determined, they have around 6000 tanks in storage of which around 3000 are in a condition where they can be brought back into service.
- The other issue Russia has is that the stored tanks are very much a mixed bag that includes some T-90's, over 1000 T80's, several thousand T72's as well as older T-64's, T-62's, T-55's, T54's as well as some T-34's (for victory day parades etc).
- Of these stored units, the ones that are in the easiest restoration condition are the T-72/80/90.
*about a minute and a half in there's an ad for some computer game, spool forwards to 02:49 to resume the content...