eoin_k
Lawyer's fees, beetroot and music
>50% of male lions die as a result of violence with other male lions. I would see a troop of baboons as more analogous to human society - baboon society is very hierarchical, and while male lions must defeat other males to become a pack leader, the infant of a high-ranking baboon mother is itself also high-ranking without having to do anything. Surely that's more analogous to human society and the privilege we're talking about on this thread.
In studies of similarly hierarchical vervet monkeys, it is observed that low-ranking individuals tend to be much more friendly towards individuals from rival troops, and also much less interested in defending territory, than their high-ranking 'betters'. Again, I see parallels here - those without privilege do not necessarily share the concerns of those with privilege over maintaining the existing order. Why should they?
Isn't the obvious problem with all your analogies from other animal species that they tend to essentialise human social relations? One of the most remarkable properties of human social life has to be its malleability. No other species can begin to reflect the range of different forms. We can't begin to generalise about political organisation of ancient Sparta and a Swiss mountain valley, or familial relations between the Saudi Arabian royal family and within the kinship networks on a Pacific Atoll, or economic life in a rural peasant commune and a modern capitalist state.
Last edited: