Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit


A highly suspicious performance from Dershowitz there. Ofcourse, what Hannity and Dershowitz didn't mention was that there are two other witnesses who saw him getting massages.

I think we need an Epstein thread btw, as this is about much more than just Andrew.

Btw, it's not just Bill Clinton we're talking about here, but basically everyone connected/involved in the Clinton Foundation (Epstein being the biggest donor to that it seems) and this ofcourse includes Trump (who is looking very suspect here despite what the MAGAs are saying). It also includes Doug Band, who worked closely with Bill Clinton for about 20 years and seems to have been the link between Maxwell and Epstein to Clinton. And you've also got Alex Acosta (Labour Secretary under Trump) Glenn Dubin, Bill Richardson and Thomas Pritzker involved.

Really it looks like there's already enough for people to be brought in for questioning and for a proper investigation to be launched, but that's not happening, probably because we're talking about members of the ruling elite here - not ordinary people.

A real shame about Chomsky, but I'd say we need to find out more about his involvement with Epstein and if it goes beyond the financial dealings regarding the death of his wife. Still doesn't change the fact that in my view he's a brilliant political analyst, especially with regard to international affairs.

We'll have to see what else is revealed in time. Shocking stuff about Hawking.
 
Last edited:
A highly suspicious performance from Dershowitz there. Ofcourse, what Hannity and Dershowitz didn't mention was that there are two other witnesses who saw him getting massages.

I think we need an Epstein thread btw, as this is about much more than just Andrew.

Btw, it's not just Bill Clinton we're talking about here, but basically everyone connected/involved in the Clinton Foundation (Epstein being the biggest donor to that it seems) and this ofcourse includes Trump (who is looking very suspect here despite what the MAGAs are saying). It also includes Doug Band, who worked closely with Bill Clinton for about 20 years and seems to have been the link between Maxwell and Epstein to Clinton. And you've also got Alex Acosta (Labour Secretary under Trump) Glenn Dubin, Bill Ricardson and Thomas Pritzker involved.

Really it looks like there's already enough for people to be brought in for questioning and for a proper investigation to be launched, but that's not happening, probably because we're talking about members of the ruling elite here - not ordinary people.

A real shame about Chomsky, but I'd say we need to find out more about his involvement with Epstein and if it goes beyond the financial dealings regarding the death of his wife. Still doesn't change the fact that in my view he's a brilliant political analyst, especially with regard to international affairs.

We'll have to see what else is revealed in time. Shocking stuff about Hawking.
Dunno why it’s shocking. None of this stuff is.
 

The trove of documents from a lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's most prominent accusers, exposed over 150 names of prominent figures like Donald Trump, Michael Jackson, and David Copperfield, but one of the most…intriguing pieces of information was about the strange and upsetting way the U.K.'s Prince Andrew used a puppet version of himself.
 

The trove of documents from a lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's most prominent accusers, exposed over 150 names of prominent figures like Donald Trump, Michael Jackson, and David Copperfield, but one of the most…intriguing pieces of information was about the strange and upsetting way the U.K.'s Prince Andrew used a puppet version of himself.
"Democrat conspiracy" is an easy, all-purpose get-out clause.
 

The trove of documents from a lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's most prominent accusers, exposed over 150 names of prominent figures like Donald Trump, Michael Jackson, and David Copperfield, but one of the most…intriguing pieces of information was about the strange and upsetting way the U.K.'s Prince Andrew used a puppet version of himself.
There are four references to Trump - two regarding Epstein and others going to one of his casinos (where they met Copperfield) and two clarifying that someone didn't give him a massage, with sexual favours or otherwise.

It's an utterly tedious document, with no revelations whatsoever, other than they met David Copperfield, and Ghislaine didn't have a topless photo taken with the Pope.
 
24 January 2023: What if Prince Andrew is innocent?

5 January 2024: A selection of newspaper front pages



_132209146_metro-nc.png



_132208885_daily_mirror-nc.png



_132209149_the_sun-nc.png



_132208884_daily_mail-nc.png
 
24 January 2023: What if Prince Andrew is innocent?

5 January 2024: A selection of newspaper front pages



_132209146_metro-nc.png



_132208885_daily_mirror-nc.png



_132209149_the_sun-nc.png



_132208884_daily_mail-nc.png

Quite tellingly, the Daily Telegraph, which a few months ago suddenly and inexplicably started publishing front page articles and opinion pieces suggesting Andrew was innocent, is one paper today that doesn't name Andrew in its headlines.

Fucking scumbags.
 

Another bunch of fucking scumbags.

UK law permits the prosecution of British child sex abusers no matter where in the world they committed their abuse, so why so quick to dismiss this clear-cut accusation? Nothing to do with his brah's coat of arms on their tit-hats, oh no...
 
UK law permits the prosecution of British child sex abusers no matter where in the world they committed their abuse, so why so quick to dismiss this clear-cut accusation? Nothing to do with his brah's coat of arms on their tit-hats, oh no...
They don't have his brah's coat of arms on their hats. All the cops I've seen still sport his ma"s
 
Quite tellingly, the Daily Telegraph, which a few months ago suddenly and inexplicably started publishing front page articles and opinion pieces suggesting Andrew was innocent, is one paper today that doesn't name Andrew in its headlines.

Fucking scumbags.

Is it under new management?
 
Actually, 'several' and/or 'numerous' according to this:

I notice he falls back on this as his defence of the visits, at the end of that piece:


Mealy mouthed shite of course, but even if 13 months + plea deal wiped out the fact that he was a sex trafficker - it doesn't - he was still a mega rich scumbag. What the fuck would any decent leftist have to do with filth like that?
Chomsky is the name that has suprised me most on the list. And particularly some financial shenanigans that implies they were friends. Weird.
 
Chomsky is the name that has suprised me most on the list. And particularly some financial shenanigans that implies they were friends. Weird.
It’s disappointing isn’t it? I mean, he’s been disappointing me politically for a while, but still, it’s not something you can just explain away “they went to school together” or something. They didn’t. That’s not how Chomsky got to know him.
 
New stuff revealed today, HRH Sweatless stayed at the paedo-lair in Palm Beach for weeks at a time, receiving massages on a daily basis. The massages were performed not by qualified masseuses, but by the very same people Epstein was nicked for noncing and Maxwell is serving 20 years for procuring. Why aren't the Met nicking the cunt?
 
Last edited:
It’s disappointing isn’t it? I mean, he’s been disappointing me politically for a while, but still, it’s not something you can just explain away “they went to school together” or something. They didn’t. That’s not how Chomsky got to know him.
Also, someone like Hawking, while he was actually quite sound politically (hated Thatcher), was also quite possibly a bit naive as well, as many scientists tend to be. But Chomsky's whole intellectual schtick is don't be naive. Even without the sexual abuse, it's a rotten place for him to end up - the author of Manufacturing Consent accepting favours from the manufacturers. With the sexual abuse, well, if he claims not to have seen anything dodgy, frankly I don't believe him.
 
Also, someone like Hawking, while he was actually quite sound politically (hated Thatcher), was also quite possibly a bit naive as well, as many scientists tend to be. But Chomsky's whole intellectual schtick is don't be naive. Even without the sexual abuse, it's a rotten place for him to end up - the author of Manufacturing Consent accepting favours from the manufacturers. With the sexual abuse, well, if he claims not to have seen anything dodgy, frankly I don't believe him.
... particularly as he was enjoying hospitality/getting paid from a convicted sex offender.
 
This is a bit wow
There are Prince Andrew sex tapes :eek:


No!

According to Sky News, she made these claims in one court, in order to secure some protection for herself, and later admitted in another court that she had made-up the claims.
 
Back
Top Bottom