Yes, funny how people never question the nebulous, shadowy organisations they get their ideas from about how the world is manipulated by nebulous, shadowy organisations.
One thing to think about: we've had the accusation before that other vaccines have been used to inject nanobots or other forms of control. Equally, quite large numbers of people, as in tens of thousands, have received Covid vaccines as part of drug trials. Where is the evidence of these nanobots? Presumably it would be quite easy to display them under a simple microscope? Where is the evidence of all this hardware interacting with our organs?Call me tinfoil hat if you like.
I won't be vaccinated, it's not that I don't believe in COVID I think the measures they are taking against it is about control. No gatherings, no protests, lockdowns knock on effects.
I wonder if the vaccine has microscopic nanobots in it, and what has Bill Gates got to do with inoculation?
Just being announced. 95% effective.
Hopes of Covid vaccine for more than 1bn people by end of 2021
Moderna becomes second firm to reveal positive results with nearly 95% protection in trialswww.theguardian.com
But at £38 to £45 for a course of two shots, Moderna’s vaccine is more expensive than the other frontrunners. AstraZeneca and Oxford University are aiming to sell their vaccine at about £3 a dose, while vaccines in trial with Johnson and Johnson and a collaboration between Sanofi and GSK are both expected to cost about £8 per dose. Pfizer is charging the US about £30 for a two-shot course. The UK has ordered 40m Pfizer shots but none of the Moderna vaccine.
Just being announced. 95% effective.
Hopes of Covid vaccine for more than 1bn people by end of 2021
Moderna becomes second firm to reveal positive results with nearly 95% protection in trialswww.theguardian.com
Blimey. Of the patients in the study sample only 5 had the active dose. Not sure you can rely on the results quite yet!
The Guardian story is erroneous, the news channels are stating. 15,000 participants received placebo, 90 got sick.Blimey. Of the patients in the study sample only 5 had the active dose. Not sure you can rely on the results quite yet!
No, 95 patients ended-up with covid, 90 had the placebo, 5 had the vaccine.
Why?Vaccines don’t save lives. Vaccination saves lives.
I won’t get one anyway!
This Guardian story is erroneous, the news channels are stating. 15,000 participants received placebo, 90 got sick.
15,000 received vaccine, 5 got sick.
Moderna: Covid vaccine shows nearly 95% protection Moderna: Covid vaccine shows nearly 95% protection
The analysis was based on the first 95 to develop Covid-19 symptoms.
Only five of the Covid cases were in people given the vaccine, 90 were in those given the dummy treatment. The company says the vaccine is protecting 94.5%.
The data also shows there were 11 cases of severe Covid in the trial, but none happened in people who were immunised.
I've got the flu vaccine on Wednesday - if they were going to be putting nanobots anywhere they'd be putting them in that.
I'll report back.
Yes the guardian article has mistakes compared to other news outlets. I will delete it!This bit doesn’t quite stack up?
Because I have a compromised immune system at the moment.Why?
Yes the guardian article has mistakes compared to other news outlets. I will delete it!
An interim analysis released on Monday, and based on 95 patients with confirmed Covid infections, found the candidate vaccine has an efficacy of 94.5%. The company said it now plans to apply to the US regulator, the Food and Drug Administration, for emergency-use authorisation in the coming weeks. In the analysis, 90 of the patients received the placebo with the remaining five the vaccine.
This bit doesn’t quite stack up?
It does I think. 95 people developed Covid of which 90 had the placebo and 5 had the vaccine. Of those 11 developed severe Covid of which all had the placebo - none of the severe cases had had the vaccine.
By the way, this may be a naive question, but I honestly don't know the answer - once there are vaccines approved and available, is there anything to prevent private providers from supplying them for a fee at purchasers' convenience? I'm sure plenty of even vaguely affluent people would be happy to pay large sums to have them 6 months ahead of everyone else.
It will be fascinating to see how the differences between vaccines play out - eg cost, transportability.
By the way, this may be a naive question, but I honestly don't know the answer - once there are vaccines approved and available, is there anything to prevent private providers from supplying them for a fee at purchasers' convenience? I'm sure plenty of even vaguely affluent people would be happy to pay large sums to have them 6 months ahead of everyone else.
The Government has insisted there will be no queue-jumping for a Covid-19 vaccine and “every single person in the UK” will be offered one for free on the NHS before any private providers will even have a product to sell, i can reveal.
A ministerial source at the Department of Health said that while private healthcare providers are permitted to source vaccines from manufacturers such as BioNTech/Pfizer and Astrazeneca/Oxford, any orders intended for sale to their customers will be put “at the back of the queue” and not delivered until the UK Government has received all of its orders.
There will be no private vaccination for a long time.
No 'queue-jumping' for private healthcare providers over Covid-19 vaccine
Those in lower-priority groups could face a long wait for the vaccine, and private patients will not be able to pay to get it earlyinews.co.uk