littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Politicians set up working parties all the time, mind you. Not sure what the fuss is about.I do fancy the sort of job where you can’t tell whether you’re at a party or at work, though.
Politicians set up working parties all the time, mind you. Not sure what the fuss is about.I do fancy the sort of job where you can’t tell whether you’re at a party or at work, though.
Isn’t that something written by de Tocqueville?It's a depressingly familiar pattern.
Tory wins an election then fucks up something or other, resigns.
New tory comes in, wins an election then fucks up something or other, resigns.
New tory comes in, wins an election then fucks up something or other, resigns.
New tory comes in...
C'est la Belle Démocratie.Isn’t that something written by de Tocqueville?
This, I'd actually rather he stayed where he was and booted out at the ballot box instead of some libertarian nutcase coming in who will be worse.It’s all very entertaining to see him in strife, but what’s the outcome going to be? The guy who was in Number 11 moves next door? It’s not much of a win.
Johnson lives in number 11.It’s all very entertaining to see him in strife, but what’s the outcome going to be? The guy who was in Number 11 moves next door? It’s not much of a win.
Had he known it was a party? Probably strippers and a better DJJohnson says he accepts things should have been done differently at the party in the garden. Why don't they ask him how he would have done things differently?
The whole "bring your own booze" still seems odd to me, especially given that I imagine they normally spend large amounts of cash on "hospitality".Better catering.
That was my first thought when this story originally broke.I do fancy the sort of job where you can’t tell whether you’re at a party or at work, though.
I know. I was using the convention of the address standing for the office.Johnson lives in number 11.
Easy to miss amongst all the bluster...
And as yet another piss take of the little people, put in the invite but only as an in jokeThe whole "bring your own booze" still seems odd to me, especially given that I imagine they normally spend large amounts of cash on "hospitality".
Sunak has been sabotaging Johnson for ages by refusing money for his policy priorities. Don't imagine his responsibility for where we are will go unnoticed for too long
The whole "bring your own booze" still seems odd to me, especially given that I imagine they normally spend large amounts of cash on "hospitality".
I wonder if it was done like that deliberately in an attempt to ensure deniability or something.
Hasn't worked out too well, has it?
I wouldn't be so sure. I can't help thinking - as I've said in the bit of the post you didn't quote - that sunak's disloyalty to Johnson isn't going to help him gain and retain the trust of the parliamentary cp. And I don't see how any initial popularity is going to be retained given his complicity in the events of the past eighteen months-two years. Things like the vast sums spaffed away on shit PPE. As our leaders seem on an accelerating downward spiral I wonder what joys lie ahead with a man whose immediate family is richer than the queen in downing street.I know. I was using the convention of the address standing for the office.
Basically, this changes nothing.
When will he next show his face in Yorkshire?Sunak was conspicuous by his absence today. Down in Devon it would seem.
Sunak was conspicuous by his absence today. Down in Devon it would seem.
I'd be happy to send them there again if they hadn't been promised to the penguinsI can remember when it was Afghanistan that our political leaders fled to when avoiding embarrassment in the Commons.
I'd be happy to send them there again if they hadn't been promised to the penguins
I'm keeping my eyes peeled, just in case.Sunak was conspicuous by his absence today. Down in Devon it would seem.
The argument that "it changes nothing" I find quite miserabilist - the public outrage sends a message to these wankers about the limits of their power. see also - elections.
Miserabilism a pretty mainstream position these days.
Sunak should be in prison for Eat Out to Help Out but he is clearly on maneouvres to take over.
As for today's farcical and unfunny pantomine, no one but political obsessives watch PMQs anymore anyway. Watching Sur Kieth's "cross examination" is like watching an episode of Kavanagh QC on a damp midweek afternoon. Kavanagh QC probably has better viewer ratings, too.
The prime minister’s lies have finally caught up with him. Not content with kicking bereaved families like mine in the teeth by breaking the rules he set and then lying to us about it, he’s now taking the British public for fools by pretending he ‘didn’t know it was a party’.
Every time he lies to us, he pours more salt into the wounds of those who have already lost so much to this pandemic, but that doesn’t stop him. He’s incapable of telling the truth and he needs to go.
The prime minister is now a walking public health hazard, who has lost the trust, respect and good faith of the public. If restrictions are needed to protect lives in the future, people will simply laugh at him. He has no moral authority and will cost lives.
He has broken his own rules and if he had any decency he would now resign, rather than hide behind an internal “inquiry”. If he doesn’t, his MPs should remove him. They have a moral duty to do so.
you'd have thought a load of people queing up outside with bags of cans would have been noticed too.I think so. There can’t have been many catering businesses doing much work then. Word would’ve very easily got out.