Try it now christian:That's neither what Brand's said, nor what I've 'endorsed', nor what I've said. And part of your post doesn't even make a blind bit of sense so I've no clue what it means. Other than that you're spot on.
You've endorsed the idea that the left only want traitors whilst calling people traitors yourself, then, you later post a quote following criticism of Brand, that mocks people who only see saints or sinners. Seems pretty clear.
Original reply still applies.Try it now christian:
That's in your mind only, Meg.He's a fallen angel eh corax, oh if only the other thickos could recognise his ambiguity - his social meaning - as i do.
This, was in yours - why don't you own it?Original reply still applies.
That's in your mind only, Meg.
There is no in-between. All are either saints or demons, all their works either gospel or blasphemy.
Do you really not get it? It was a parody of people like you.This, was in yours - why don't you own it?
Why run away? You either now think it's crap or you still believe it - which is it?
Oddly enough, yeah, hence the reaction you prat. After me offering a nuanced reading of the brand stuff as well, one that was far beyond anything you offered and certainly notDo you really not get it? It was a parody of you.
There is no in-between. All are either saints or demons, all their works either gospel or blasphemy.
When Russell Brand told Jeremy Paxman there would an anti-capitalist revolution, the comedian was speaking for all those who despise what growing inequality is doing to their lives.
Russell Brand skewered my old mate Jeremy Paxman last night, on the subject of "revolution". Or rather, they skewered each other. It was one of those rare media occasions where each participant achieves exactly what they want to: Russell to inspire a generation, Jeremy to get a feisty interview with one of the key voices of his age.
Seriously, these people have take the idea and ran with it, mirrored it with the idea of coming into the light, you've been trapped by others in a cave. Forget plato here.I may be wildly off the mark on the cave front and know little of the content of Ikes conspiracy theories but he is not the first to talk about caves. In a non 'Welcome to the Peak District' sense.
he's got more working class people talking about revolution than anybody else lately.
i think mark the taxi driver makes the same points with a lot more eloquence
This is a problem then isn't it? How are we going to make this stuff real elsewhere? If we don't it's just asking for more people to go on news-night.I'm sure there's tons of people who make the same points with a lot more eloquence but they aren't being interviewed by Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight and having the link to the interview shared around on social media
This is a problem then isn't it? How are we going to make this stuff real elsewhere? If we don't it's just asking for more people to go on news-night.
I'm sure there's tons of people who make the same points with a lot more eloquence but they aren't being interviewed by Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight and having the link to the interview shared around on social media
totally agree, but you know the right spark and all that. The uprising in Istanbul began over the saving of a small, local park but in the process brought up a lot of big political issues and mobilised thousands of people.
nobody except the left gives a fuck what laurie penny does.millionaire Icke supporters are calling for revolution against their own class on news night and this is a good thing? how is this any different to what laurie pennie is doing when she becomes an editor of the new statesman and gets up in the oxford union and calls herself a revolutionary socialist?
nobody except the left gives a fuck what laurie penny does.
She edits the paper this brand character edited this time. The last time this happened the rich person jemmima khan paid to take it over and guest edit. It's worth pointing out the pot they all piss in.nobody except the left gives a fuck what laurie penny does.
And neither is it likely they'll be. Celebrity has power. Whether it should or shouldn't is irrelevant. So shunning it out of some sort of leftist puritanism is just self-defeating.I'm sure there's tons of people who make the same points with a lot more eloquence but they aren't being interviewed by Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight and having the link to the interview shared around on social media
Oh great, now we're puritans - why did you use this pejorative? It's traitor gait#3. ffs.And neither is it likely they'll be. Celebrity has power. Whether it should or shouldn't is irrelevant. So shunning it out of some sort of leftist puritanism is just self-defeating.