rioted
redundant
No, BA is never wrong. Off to the gulags with you!There's always a danger of posts being read the wrong way. I think that just happened.
No, BA is never wrong. Off to the gulags with you!There's always a danger of posts being read the wrong way. I think that just happened.
No, BA is never wrong. Off to the gulags with you!
Ok, can you put your point in another way please? Because that post to me looked like a mish-mash of having a finger wag at both brand and people who criticised him mixed with a suggestion that the latter are so picky they will only accept a new christ as valid.There's always a danger of posts being read the wrong way. I think that just happened.
he can fuck off an' all.a suggestion that the latter are so picky they will only accept a new christ as valid.
Ok, can you put your point in another way please? Because that post to me looked like a mish-mash of having a finger wag at both brand and people who criticised him mixed with a suggestion that the latter are so picky they will only accept a new christ as valid.
I agree. I can already sense people falling into making all this stuff about him rather than the issues - i've probably done it myself on this thread as well. I think some people may well end up in How shall we fuck off, O Lord? situation if they're not a bit more careful.Oh right, you sounded like you'd completely missed the point first time round. I should have known you hadn't.
I know this is a Russell Brand thread in the TV section, so it's only natural it should be about him - but broadening it out a bit i wasn't finger wagging at Brand so much as he’s irrelevant in that what he said was the important bit, not what he’s like as a bloke. Everything else involving the attachment of his personality to those comments (and future ones) are eventually doomed to fail in some combination of tangled MSM smears with those who broadly agreeing with him feeling that at some point that ‘he’s let the side down by doing x,y,z.’ So my point was we shouldn't obsess about who says these things and defend them because ultimately we're all flawed individuals. He's shone a bit of light where it doesn't always get exposed and that's all we should be thankful for in my view.
I agree. I can already sense people falling into making all this stuff about him rather than the issues - i've probably done it myself on this thread as well. I think some people may well end up in How shall we fuck off, O Lord? situation if they're not a bit more careful.
You'd have thought he'd have learnt his lesson from last time around.
Leaves rioted looking like a bit of a tit either wayIm not sure if im relieved or pleased you agreed with me
If i was plagiarizing stuff I would at least try to find something better than shit like that.Have a read of this error strewn nonsense:
A response to Russell Brand: Five ways that voting does make a difference
A 393 seat majority you say?
(Bloodworth has been caught plagiarising as well hasn't he?)
That wasn't plagiarised. Bloodworth was outed for his use of other peoples work on here a number of times over the last few years.If i was plagiarizing stuff I would at least try to find something better than shit like that.
Thankyou.i've probably done it myself on this thread as well.
Russell Brand calls David Cameron a 'filthy, dirty, posh w***er'
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-e...-cameron-a-filthy-dirty-posh-wer-8939040.html
At least Alex Jones isn't in this one.one hour and 7 minutes and 54 seconds, G-d spare us
You actually watched it!At least Alex Jones isn't in this one.
Well he's not in the first five minutes anyway.You actually watched it!