RaverDrew said:I'm not just having a pop at you, I've been doing it to everyone recently.
I think I'm turning into a grumpy old man.
Ok, cos i was starting to take it personally
RaverDrew said:I'm not just having a pop at you, I've been doing it to everyone recently.
I think I'm turning into a grumpy old man.
kyser_soze said:I think we're in the same boat on this TBH - don't believe the official account, but don't think the conspiracy types have a credible narrative or evidence to support it.
I think you answered your own questioneditor said:So, how come none of his many, many work colleagues are lining up to back him up and corroborate his amazing story?
And if it was all a big invisible-missile-explodin' conspiracy and this guy is supposedly blowing the lid on it all, why haven't the govt shut him up in double quick time?
Have you ever tried putting in a FOIA request?
Ain't that the word. Jazzz doesn't seem to realise what an unwitting asset he and his ilk are to BushBlairDubversion said:yep. Any vague attempt on my part to try and consider the inevitable elements of bullshit in the official account get blocked by the conspiraloon stuff. It does the government's work for them
Jazzz said:There's a document posted up with his post entitled 'proof of Lauro's military record'. He's also been on the Alex Jones show
CENTCOM Sergeant Details Traitorous Stand Down Orders On 9/11
axon said:It's just a mighty shame that this guy's military record is faked. The truth-seekers really are getting desperate.
Despite early (and healthy) reactions claiming this may be a hoax designed to poison the well of the 9/11 truth movement, Sergeant Chavez has now provided us with evidence of his credentials, his honorable discharge documents showing the military installations he was located inside. The last station he held was inside United States Central Command in Tampa
Despite early (and healthy) reactions claiming this may be a hoax designed to poison the well of the 9/11 truth movement,
Now that Mr. Chavez has answered some softball questions put forward by his conspiracy theorist friends, how about he answer some real questions:
1. Why does his DD-214 list no foreign service, despite his claim to an 8 month tour in Afghanistan?
2. Why does his DD-214 omit many ribbons that he should have automatically (not merit based requiring his commander to submit them) based on his service, including 1 NDSM, an NCO Professional Development ribbon, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and a NATO medal?
3. Why does his DD-214 list a 14 week Special Forces Q course, despite the fact that the course is considerably longer, and makes no mention of SFAS or Airborne training, both prerequisites, and does not list a Special Forces MOS?
4. Why, even though he claims expertise with explosives does he claim that thermite, an incendiary, is an explosive and a component of C-4?
5. Why does he suggest that Afghan soldiers could not have flown the hijacked planes, despite the fact that nobody has ever claimed they did?
6. Why does he claim to have spoken with a "good buddy" Lieutenent General, who was a former commander of the Army Corp of Engineers at CENTCOM in 2001, when the only 3 star assigned to CENTCOM at that time was Lieutenent General Michael P. DeLong, a Marine?
6. Why does he claim he flew in an uparmored C5 into Kabul on September 25th (or September 26th his story changes) 2001, when Kabul was securely in Taliban hands until it was liberated by the Northern Alliance on November 13th, 2001?
http://www.csmonitor.com/2001/1114/p1s1-wosc.html
7. Why does he claim to have pulled "roving guard" on an oil pipeline in 2001-2002, despite the fact that this pipeline is still in the planning stages 5 years later?
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2006/2006-04-17-05.asp
8. Why does he repeatedly claim that he received a Chapter 13 separation discharge to enter school, when a Chapter 13 is a discharge for "unsatisfactory performance"?
http://www.usapa.army.mil/pdffiles/r635_200.pdf
9. What type of shoulder fired weapon causes could cause the type of damage seen at the Pentagon, as he mentioned in a radio interview this morning?
10. Why does he repeatedly claim that Dick Cheney was appointed head of NORAD in 2001, when the commander of NORAD at that time was actually Air Force General Ralph Eberhart?
Answer those questions, and I will start to take you seriously.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/3202
Why does his DD-214 list no foreign service, despite his claim to an 8 month tour in Afghanistan?
Honestly, you know what - I’m done with all of this. Every time I log onto this site, it just makes me sick. I cant believe I actually told myself this was the right thing to do. You all proceed on with your investigative studies - I'm going to continue to tell my story to people who actually care; not people who question the questioners. I'm on your side - remember?
Look - I spoke with Alfons yesterday from Veterans for 911 truth - honestly, I cannot prove anything.
I cannot prove that I saw a document stating the scenarios for our exercise.
I cannot remember the name of the officer that told me and about 8 other people there was an order for NORAD to stand down.
I cannot prove either of those things - but I heard them with my own ears.
You all proceed on with your investigative studies - I'm going to continue to tell my story to people who actually care; not people who question the questioners.
I don't know what you thought you were doing.Jazzz said:Oh dear, does look like he's dodgy. Don't know what he thought he was doing. Shame.
Notice how others have had to do your own basic checking for you again? After all these years I'd have thought you'd have the pattern noticed by now.Jazzz said:Oh dear, does look like he's dodgy. Don't know what he thought he was doing. Shame.
In his never-ending desperation to believe any old conspiraloon shit posted up on the internet, Jazzz makes a total and utter cock himself once again.Jazzz said:Oh dear, does look like he's dodgy. Don't know what he thought he was doing.
The problem is that he starts from a position of absolute belief in any dubiously sourced claim (e.g. "Military insider reveals 9/11 stand-down!") and then relies on people to research his idiotic stories for him.Dubversion said:to be fair, ed, this is about the first time i've seen Jazz put his hand up to being wrong, so i think rather than pouring scorn, we should give him props for not trying to wriggle out of it. It might be the start of something beautiful
Yeah, but imagine if people hadn't bothered to research the 'facts' and forced him to admit that he was talking utter bollocks?!Dubversion said:don't misunderstand me, i'm all for correcting him. I just reckon the fact that for once he hasn't squirmed and wriggled is progress
Because he's a "truthseeker" on a higher mission and as such has no need to trouble himself with trifles like research, credible sources, evidence, facts, corroborated statements etc etc.slaar said:Why don't you check things out and use some critical thought before you post?
slaar said:Jazz actually held his hand up last week too, after the last thread he posted turned out to be a load of rubbish:
http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=178296&page=2
Why don't you check things out and use some critical thought before you post?