Rompipalle
“Mad as hell & I’m not going to take this anymore”
Only if you came from Cumbernauld or Grangemouth.So if I did something, they'd report that my parents came from Scotland?
Only if you came from Cumbernauld or Grangemouth.So if I did something, they'd report that my parents came from Scotland?
You don’t lose the abilty to do things (mostly) when you’re mentally unwell. Some people ended up catatonic but other people end up in a kind of parallel world, living in our world. It’s hard to understand if you haven’t been there.First and foremost it just breaks your heart to hear what has happened and then also see the victims that the news has reported. The more you think about it, the more it sinks in and you just cannot imagine what the parents must be going through to lose a child
I almost don't want to give any thought to anything other than the victims, the families and anyone else affected but can't help but think what must be going through the mind of someone to commit such an act?
You think they must be mentally ill to want to do it but then think they must be sane to have planned to do it, where is the line? What turns someone from not doing things like that to being able to carry them out?
RIP to those girls who were right at the beginning of their lives, no words or actions I think will ever help the parents deal with something like that I'm not a parent but I don't know how I'd carry on.
Thanks, I'll admit I don't understand it. I wish the human brain was a bit simpler as in most people will not want to attack or hurt children, what turns that thought into "I'm going to carry this attack out"?You don’t lose the abilty to do things (mostly) when you’re mentally unwell. Some people ended up catatonic but other people end up in a kind of parallel world, living in our world. It’s hard to understand if you haven’t been there.
I know and it’s a bit more complex than that because you look at people like Ian Brady, who carried out their actions over a long period of time and were able to carry on normal life while doing so.Thanks, I'll admit I don't understand it. I wish the human brain was a bit simpler as in most people will not want to attack or hurt children, what turns that thought into "I'm going to carry this attack out"?
You may feel like it’s a poor defence but that doesn’t necessarily take away from the fact that a good way to prevent these kinds of attacks is well resourced and well funded mental health services. I’m not talking about what happens to the perpetrators necessarily, I’m talking about how to prevent this kind of attack.I think poor mental health is a very weak defence for pre-meditated attacks like this and the Nottingham murders. I totally understand why the families of the Nottingham murder victims feel they haven’t got justice.
fundamentally where Mental health is used as a Defence / Mitigation/ reason for Hospital Order rather than a Prison sentence it's generally because the individual is Delusional and /or PsychoticI think poor mental health is a very weak defence for pre-meditated attacks like this and the Nottingham murders. I totally understand why the families of the Nottingham murder victims feel they haven’t got justice.
I think poor mental health is a very weak defence for pre-meditated attacks like this and the Nottingham murders. I totally understand why the families of the Nottingham murder victims feel they haven’t got justice.
fundamentally where Mental health is used as a Defence / Mitigation/ reason for Hospital Order rather than a Prison sentence it;s generally becasue the individual is Delusional and /or Psychotic
then there is the myth that being on a Hospital Order especially in High Secure or Medium Secure is somehow 'cushy' compared to Prison time
The report also called on the government to consider changing the categorisation of homicide into three tiers - first degree murder, second degree murder and manslaughter - as recommended by the Law Commission nearly 20 years ago.
The families were told Caldocano had murdered their children even though the CPS knew they’d never make a murder charge stick.Its also worth noting that reports about the Nottingham attacks and the review into how the case was handled include stuff like:
Nottingham attacks: Families call for law change after CPS review
A review following the Nottingham attacks suggests the government should reconsider homicide laws.www.bbc.co.uk
Personally I can entirely understand why victims relatives are unhappy with a verdict that doesnt involve the word murder. But I have no problem whatsoever with the mental health realities being looked at properly when trying to understand why a particular criminal act happened, and where it is appropriate to put the guilty party.
Hence 'almost'. And tell me this: then why target an event aimed at little girls, themed around a female pop star? Is it so hard to believe that there are men who hate women so much they'd kill little girls? Or that incels hate little Swifties because they'll grow up to be 'sluts and whores'?I think you should wait a bit before making pronouncements like that.
I find it very hard to reconcile the idea of true premeditation with a psychotic episode. But like I said, I have not read much more than the basics in the papers.The families were told Caldocano had murdered their children even though the CPS knew they’d never make a murder charge stick.
You can still be a murderer if you have MH problems. It feels wrong that it isn’t the case. nottsgirl - he tooled up, got a train from London and went on his killing spree.
Hence 'almost'. And tell me this: then why target an event aimed at little girls, themed around a female pop star?
He got a taxi there.Did he actively "target" the girls, or was he out to do some damage and come across them as a target of opportunity?
It's way too soon to speculate about his motivation.
It's way too soon to speculate about his motivation.
He got a taxi from his house to the venue where the class was being held. He didn’t pay for the taxi and had conversations with the male taxi driver and a couple of other blokes before he headed off to the back of the centre where the class was being held. There was nothing opportunistic about this attack.Did he actively "target" the girls, or was he out to do some damage and come across them as a target of opportunity?
It's way too soon to speculate about his motivation.
Why did he get a taxi to the event?
He got a taxi from his house to the venue where the class was being held. He didn’t pay for the taxi and had conversations with the male taxi driver and a couple of other blokes before he headed off to the back of the centre where the class was being held. There was nothing opportunistic about this attack.
name might be released the start of the trial or might only be released on conviction<snip>
Stating his ethnicity also somewhat has the effect of ruling out other people who might be being rumoured to be involved. Giving his name will help more, and presumably they will at some point even though he's a minor, it'll just take longer.
And even though even that will only somewhat help, due to other loons who want an excuse to blame their pet hate group, it will still help.
It wasn’t about that. My point was (if you read my post a bit more carefully), that this wasn’t random.Someone can be psychotically delusional and able to order a taxi. The two aren't mutually exclusive.
You think they must be mentally ill to want to do it but then think they must be sane to have planned to do it,