Raheem
Well-Known Member
ffs the IRA blew up half of Manchester.. without troops being on the streets in the aftermath
What, so Manchester used to be twice the size it is now?
ffs the IRA blew up half of Manchester.. without troops being on the streets in the aftermath
oh do fuck off ...
if you are unfazed with the presence of soldiers on the street of the country you live in..
so be it
What, so Manchester used to be twice the size it is now?
Did I say that? But there's no denying that what happened yesterday is a bigger deal than the 1996 bombing, which actually didn't even destroy half a street in Manchester.
As a single event perhaps, but the death toll also needs to be put in a context of a decade that has seen relatively low levels of political violence by non-state actors in Britain.
Donald Trump has got a big gob. Apparently America released the name against the wishes of British intelligence which is a bit of a kick in the teeth. (Guardian reports).Odd that so much info is coming from US officials.
"US officials say it was a suicide bomding"
"US officials have named the attacker as Salman Abedi"
What's all that about then?
I don't understand the point you're making. Are you saying that the zero deaths caused by the IRA bomb should be adjusted for inflation?
No, I'm suggesting that dealing with these clowns, however indiscriminate their violence, doesn't require the army to be deployed on the streets. In the circumstances, being sceptical of why this is happening seems entirely reasonable.
Yeah I'm really sceptical. It feels cheap to be so but I am. Also part of me is shouting "bit fucking late" although I know that predicting and preventing terror attacks must be very difficult.No, I'm suggesting that dealing with these clowns, however indiscriminate their violence, doesn't require the army to be deployed on the streets. In the circumstances, being sceptical of why this is happening seems entirely reasonable.
plus maybe a cynical move within a month of an election
"strong and stable"
I dunno, maybe it's better safe than sorry re: army deployed. Quite what use they will actually be, given that the last time there was a major terror attack in this country the only person to die afterwards in a terrorist related incident was a blameless Brazilian electrician.
Did we ever find out whether it was militarised cops or undercover squaddies who shot him?
My recollection was that it was a (poorly coordinated) mix of the two who fucked it up.
It may be because cuts to the police force mean they are unable to properly do their job.I think the troops being deployed is a step to keep the public calm/feel secure.
It may be a step to prevent vigilantly justice by groups of knuckle dragging thugs out to attack/kill Muslims.
It may be because cuts to the police force mean they are unable to properly do their job.
Yep. Preparations for the Champions League mean areas of Cardiff already look like a militarised zone, they're likely bringing coppers in from elsewhere for this. Plus all the other bank holiday and half term events going on. Deploying soldiers is a way of covering up the gaps while looking "strong".
What's that supposed to mean?
It would be the height of folly. An open goal for the Tories to say we're keeping the country safe and Labour are arguing against this - and y u no sport are troopsWonder whether Labour will make this point during the next few weeks. Would be a big gamble.
Weltweit is correct - it's a principle of first aid that you don't remove anything, because you can do as much damage extracting it as as been done by its arrival. AFAIK, even paramedics don't remove foreign bodies unless it's essential in order to stabilise the casualty for transport to hospital.Did it ?
I can't speak for OU, but I was working quite hard not to jump to conclusions.Were you expecting it to be some called John Smith?
Celebrating my birthday in Manchester as news of the Manchester Arena bomb broke. The anger is monumental.
For what reason will this ever stop?
Theresa May says such attacks "will not break us", but her own life is lived in a bullet-proof bubble, and she evidently does not need to identify any young people today in Manchester morgues. Also, "will not break us" means that the tragedy will not break her, or her policies on immigration. The young people of Manchester are already broken - thanks all the same, Theresa. Sadiq Khan says "London is united with Manchester", but he does not condemn Islamic State - who have claimed responsibility for the bomb. The Queen receives absurd praise for her 'strong words' against the attack, yet she does not cancel today's garden party at Buckingham Palace - for which no criticism is allowed in the Britain of free press. Manchester mayor Andy Burnham says the attack is the work of an "extremist". An extreme what? An extreme rabbit?
In modern Britain everyone seems petrified to officially say what we all say in private. Politicians tell us they are unafraid, but they are never the victims. How easy to be unafraid when one is protected from the line of fire. The people have no such protections.