savoloysam
Pigman's pigman's ha ha charade you are..
What's even more amazing is they've supposedly doubled their ratings
Well they are in competition with Fox
What's even more amazing is they've supposedly doubled their ratings
Anyone seen this? It's a bit
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/world/the-depth-of-the-problem/931/
Its a good graphic. It fails to show remote submersibles though, and they could recover the black box from 20,000ft.
Yes I know, but you'll have to speak to the creator of the graphic about that
I'm surprised we've heard nothing on surface debris, possibly it's dispersed quite widely by now? Maybe there isn't that much of it?
Dogsauce said:Had a look to see what precedents there were for planes never being found; not that many according to this list on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aerial_disappearances
It is noticeable (AIS data) that HMS Echo is tracking towards Ocean Shield (though has slowed recently). This might suggest it is positioning to conduct a full seabed sonar survey to follow up the location work of the towed pinger locator and the sonar buoys and waiting for the completion of the survey (they will want to keep the immediate area as acoustically quiet as possible until they have determined a manageable sonar survey area). The next closest ships are several times further away to the west around the other, larger, search area.
That's amazing resolution for sonar!Examples of imagery from the kit they have on board (from much shallower waters, of course):
Presumably the Aircraft investigation folks will want to recover as many bits as possible to solve the mystery. It's a long way down and I guess a chance that debris will have spread out on the descent.
(from BBC paper review)The fate of the missing Malaysia Airlines plane makes its way back on to the front page of the Daily Express. It quotes a claim by a source close to the hunt that investigators are now exploring the possibility that the plane landed or crashed at a remote location following the fruitless search in the Indian Ocean.
If nothing is ever found, will this become their new obsession after Diana and Maddie?
Yes, but they might have been looking to come to the UK and claim asylum so they can milk up our generous welfare system- in which case they become persons of interest.Weren't most of the passengers forrin ?
After the failure of the recent underwater search, Georesonance explorers are saying they've probably found the crash site - in the Bay of Bengal (5000km away from the area the mission has been scouring)!
https://au.news.yahoo.com/sa/a/23036893/exploration-company-believes-it-may-have-found-mh370/
Our on-site measurements are based on the phenomenon of the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Proprietary equipment is used to stimulate nuclei of the targeted mineral by using an oscillating electromagnetic field. The pertubed nuclei resonate at characteristic frequencies that are detected by GeoResonance instrumentation at the surface.
Exactly - just what sort of electromagnetic field would you need to get down to deep water ?That's just cruel, given how strongly http://georesonance.com smells of fruitloopery...
Our typical project involves 47 scientists and nuclear physicists, including 5 professors and 12 PhDs.
Slightly more credible than that, possibly. But, given the amount of power necessary to operate a medical NMR machine with a range of a few feet, I'm not sure how on earth you operate - let alone move - one big enough to detect a bit of metal under a lot of seawater.Exactly - just what sort of electromagnetic field would you need to get down to deep water ?
Sounds about as credible as dowsing.
An initial report was sent to authorities while the black box still had two weeks of battery power.
The full report was delivered on April 15.
7News tried to contact the office of search co-coordinator Angus Houston today but there was no response.