Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

United Airlines violently drag passenger off overbooked flight

I think I'd prefer state subsidy over passengers getting their teeth knocked out, yes. Wouldn't you?

The incident on this thread has nothing to do with overbooking tickets or denied boarding, but don't let that get in the way of your plans for the future of the airline industry.
 
You haven't observed anything - you've just soaked up some of the smears that are currently being pumped out online.
The fact that it was a smear doesn't make it untrue and raise concerns in his patients!
 
You think airlines should be abolished or that they should be charities?

A nice example of a false dilemma. Especially since subsidy was mentioned not one page ago. Of course the only reason the subsidy would be necessary is because the airline companies want to have their cake and eat it. They could alternatively develop a better business model that actually reflects the economic realities they operate within.
 
A nice example of a false dilemma.

It was in response to someone implying that airlines were bad because they were corporations

Of course the only reason the subsidy would be necessary is because the airline companies want to have their cake and eat it. They could alternatively develop a better business model that actually reflects the economic realities they operate within.

What would that be? They raise ticket prices and less people fly. How else can they cover their costs other than by filling seats and cutting costs given that their margins are so small - typically less than 1% when average over periods of high fuel costs where they make losses.

A notable airline that doesn't involuntarily deny boarding is Ryan Air, but their business model won't work for long haul.
 
It was in response to someone implying that airlines were bad because they were corporations



What would that be? They raise ticket prices and less people fly. How else can they cover their costs other than by filling seats and cutting costs given that their margins are so small - typically less than 1% when average over periods of high fuel costs where they make losses.

A notable airline that doesn't involuntarily deny boarding is Ryan Air, but their business model won't work for long haul.

Sounds like airline companies have spent so long cramming passengers in and cutting costs that they have now ended up backing themselves into a corner. This is not going to be sustainable for them in the long term. Oil prices are only going to go up, and widening gaps between rich and poor mean that fewer people will be able to meet their prices. So they can either suffer now, or continue living in denial and suffer a lot more in the future, quite possibly to the point of their business imploding.
 
Yep, train would be much better. you'd see so much more. it would be well worth it.

If you're going to travel the US by land, take the bus. They have all 90-day, all you can use passes, with as many stops as you like along the way. And the people you meet on buses are a, let's say "interesting" crowd. You'd go back home with lots of stories to tell.
 
Normal people? I like travelling, as slowly as possible in order to experience the errr 'experience'
I'm starting to think I'm some kind of weirdo, I mean, a very cheap three day layover in Singapore en route to NZ, courtesy of Singapore Airlines and the same offer on the return flight?
No, must rush:p
That's a holiday. If you were working, or going home to Mrs Coley and the kids for xmas, the last thing you want to be doing is fucking about with silly trains.
 
Sounds like airline companies have spent so long cramming passengers in and cutting costs that they have now ended up backing themselves into a corner. This is not going to be sustainable for them in the long term. Oil prices are only going to go up, and widening gaps between rich and poor mean that fewer people will be able to meet their prices. So they can either suffer now, or continue living in denial and suffer a lot more in the future, quite possibly to the point of their business imploding.

They've tried charging more and offering better service, but it doesn't work - people would rather pay as little as possible and put up with shit service. If there was a model that allowed them to entice people with better service without losing money, you can bet they'd already be doing it.
 
They've tried charging more and offering better service, but it doesn't work - people would rather pay as little as possible and put up with shit service. If there was a model that allowed them to entice people with better service without losing money, you can bet they'd already be doing it.

The point is that they're going to be losing money anyway. If they'd rather stick with a system that has demonstrably lead to the brutalisation of customers, then I for one won't shed even a single tear when they inevitably crash and burn in the not-so-distant future.
 
The point is that they're going to be losing money anyway. If they'd rather stick with a system that has demonstrably lead to the brutalisation of customers, then I for one won't shed even a single tear when they inevitably crash and burn in the not-so-distant future.
This is hysterical pish, Nox. ONE guy got beaten up and it was a massive fuck up that is going to cost the carrier millions.

Airlines that overbook, do so in the knowledge that the vast majority of the time they get their sums right, and as many people that they estimated wouldn't turn up for the flight, don't. People miss planes, forget flights, can't be arsed and have refundable tickets, or change plans last minute. It happens all the time and the airlines have finely tuned algorithms that they work to. On the occasions they get it wrong, more often than not, it's very easy to find people who'll fly an hour or two later, even a day, if offered compo, which is usually free tickets. On the occasions when people are involuntarily bumped they are pretty much never manhandled let alone brutalised.
 
This is hysterical pish, Nox. ONE guy got beaten up and it was a massive fuck up that is going to cost the carrier millions.

Airlines that overbook, do so in the knowledge that the vast majority of the time they get their sums right, and as many people that they estimated wouldn't turn up for the flight, don't. People miss planes, forget flights, can't be arsed and have refundable tickets, or change plans last minute. It happens all the time and the airlines have finely tuned algorithms that they work to. On the occasions they get it wrong, more often than not, it's very easy to find people who'll fly an hour or two later, even a day, if offered compo, which is usually free tickets. On the occasions when people are involuntarily bumped they are pretty much never manhandled let alone brutalised.

We'll see whether it's this incident or the changing economic climate that leads to United going bust. I reckon it'll be the latter. Nothing "hysterical" about that.

Oh, they have "finely tuned" algorithms do they? How would you know? They told you? And you believed them? Nonsense, the bastards are winging it and this nonsense about algorithms is either PR dribble, or they've bought into the bollocksology offered by whoever they've contracted out the sums to. United gambled and they lost, and rather than eat the costs themselves they used hired muscle to force them onto the consumer. Fuck 'em.
 
We'll see whether it's this incident or the changing economic climate that leads to United going bust. I reckon it'll be the latter. Nothing "hysterical" about that.

Oh, they have "finely tuned" algorithms do they? How would you know? They told you? And you believed them? Nonsense, the bastards are winging it and this nonsense about algorithms is either PR dribble, or they've bought into the bollocksology offered by whoever they've contracted out the sums to.
Lol! Never had you down as a frother! ;)

These are some of the biggest companies on the planet who spend billions researching their industry practices. They don't blow their noses without getting analysts and PhDs involved. To suggest that they are somehow "winging" their ticketing is beyond ludicrous. Overbooking works. Get over it!
United gambled and they lost, and rather than eat the costs themselves they used hired muscle to force them onto the consumer.
Don't be daft. This is one case in scores of thousands (bump-offs) that went badly wrong. Stop pretending it's common.

On your wider point, the airline industry isn't going anywhere. It's way too important. It'll change, probably increasing fares, but all that means is that only wealthy people will fly. Fortunately it won't happen in our lifetimes, and whilst people in the UK are able to fly across Europe and back for the price of a night down the pub, they will.
 
Back
Top Bottom