el-ahrairah said:the ickeists have decided that there wasn't a plane in the first place.
i haven't yet discovered why they believe this.
To distract us from the mutant zombie killer owls.
el-ahrairah said:the ickeists have decided that there wasn't a plane in the first place.
i haven't yet discovered why they believe this.
But the red marker is one the West coast of Malaysia, not the East coast of any part of Indonesia?China Daily reporting the body is in a life jacket. No confirmation.
I hope this comes out in English...
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=zh-CN&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://t.co/rpycY5iiId&act=url
Edit: Location in the link suggests body found in Penang up the coast from KL. THis is different to the first post which suggested a body was found on the other side of the Malacca Strait.
But the red marker is one the West coast of Malaysia, not the East coast of any part of Indonesia?
The first post i made was a Twitter report, but without a link saying it had been found on the east coast of Indonesia. The second, from the China Daily suggested that a body had been found in a life jacket near Penang. They might be two different reports or two confused reports on the same possible body.
A military chief admitted they were “baffled” by the lack of a distress signal from the aircraft. He confirmed that the military was “not sure” whether the plane had changed course.
“It is a possibility ... we did not track it in real time. The data appears [to suggest it changed course] we have to respond,” the official said.
He added that the raw data would be released in due course.
I think they just admitted no one was watching their military radar, only saw blip when they checked records afterwards MH370
— malcolmmoore (@MalcolmMoore) March 12, 2014
Legit or not?
Not very impressed with radar, despite quite a lot of radars looking towards this plane's path, none of them seem to have much idea where it is!
I see some idiot has used this as an opportunity for self promotion.
2 years ago and she decides to report it now
http://news.sky.com/story/1224215/malaysia-airlines-investigates-missing-co-pilot
After running more than two and a half hours late the day five media briefing in Kuala Lumpur has come up with a new last possible radar trace for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370.
It was picked up by defence radar at 2.15 am on Saturday morning, 200 nautical miles or 360 kilometres NW of Penang as an unidentified aircraft at 29,500 feet according to the chief of the Royal Malaysia Air Force, Rodzali Daud.
This is almost precisely where Mr Rodzali earlier today denied saying to the Malaysia Media that this was where defence radar saw the missing airliner after it was tracked flying across the Malaysia peninsula to the northern approach to the main Strait of Malacca.
In other words, in this very chaotic media conference, the air force chief confirmed what he denied he said yesterday, although he did not go into as much detail as was reported in the national media.
This time he said “I am not saying it was MH370.” And he also gave the radar trace a new time, 2.15 am local time, not 2.40 am, which was coincidentally or otherwise the time of last contact with the airliner originally given by Malaysia Airlines before it began a process of changing times and event descriptions on a regular and confusing basis.
It was made clear, through the clutter of the media conference, that this radar sighting inspired the original extension of the search area from the Gulf of Thailand to include the western side of the Malaysia peninsula, and today’s further extension much deeper into the Andaman Sea.
[...]
If it wasn’t an airliner looking like an airliner at 29,500 feet in Malaysia airspace that was seen by the defence radar, at a point where it should also have been easily discoverable by normal civilian ATC radar that in itself on a ‘normal’ day would be a puzzle that the authorities would presumably try to resolve without delay.
What is so frustrating in the lack of detail given by the Malaysian authorities is their failure to address such obvious questions. It would have known precisely what by way of scheduled airliners was flying over western Malaysia on Saturday morning. It doesn’t need military radar to answer that question.
These evasions or omissions in the briefing last night make it overwhelmingly likely that the original reports attributed to Rodzali Daud were correct, and that there is a cover up of important detail being attempted by the authorities, with less and less success with every day.
If they are in the Andaman or South China Seas, the traces of those who were on board MH370 are rapidly vanishing, and the dispersal of floating items of wreckage will make the location of the crash site and the black box flight data and voice recorders, which would have sunk, that much more difficult to find.
yes but people like me in the know are sworn to secrecyI strongly get the feeling that a lot more is known then is being let on.
Just a little bizarre that some official decided to cut and paste the legs of one of the two fake passport holders on to the other...
Yeah, but only because he'd have insisted that the plane would have been fine if only they'd have fuelled it with PentaAvgas and earthed it via an unobtainium ground strap.If only Jazzz was still around, this thread would be in its 200th page by now.
“We did not modify the pictures. What actually happened was the two pictures were stapled together but the bottom portion of the second suspect’s photo was torn off.
“When we photocopied the photo of the second suspect, it overlapped with the photo of the first one,” she said when contacted Wednesday.
Given the lack of debris and the limited fuel load available, the aircraft must have landed at a facility where its presence can be kept quiet. This would probably be either in the Vietnamese jungle (where recommissioning an old USAF runway would be quite straightforward) or, more likely in a remote region of China where the air traffic controllers could be relied upon to keep their mouths firmly shut. We can safely rule out North Korea for obvious reasons.
Someone on the news just now mentioned this as a possibility. It's certainly looking more likely now.
Someone on the news just now mentioned this as a possibility. It's certainly looking more likely now.
they used bean bag projectiles in the 70sJust a hypothesis: attempted hijack, someone started shooting (either security or hijacker) and the fuselage was perforated by bullets. Depressurisation would almost certainly occur and perhaps fast if there was a widow hit?
The US and Israel certainly use armed security although how that works bullet wise who knows.
Just a hypothesis: attempted hijack, someone started shooting (either security or hijacker) and the fuselage was perforated by bullets. Depressurisation would almost certainly occur and perhaps fast if there was a widow hit?
The US and Israel certainly use armed security although how that works bullet wise who knows.
they used bean bag projectiles in the 70s