Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mad Paul Mason

and despite all the analingus and silver polishing of transihed old tat, the repeated political handbrake turns, the fabrication of consistency across a bewildering spectrum of political hyperactivity, poor old Paul is absolutely no nearer adoption as a Labour candidate for a seat, winnable or otherwise.

Bless.
He shot a theoretical albatross and is condemned for all time to tell his tale to Constituency selection meetings. The delegates emerge wise and sadder bored shitless.
 
so what is the magic grandpa doing in Islington North? Is he standing as an independent, forming his own left-social-democracy platform, or retiring to spend more time with his Jerusalem Artichokes?
 
so what is the magic grandpa doing in Islington North? Is he standing as an independent, forming his own left-social-democracy platform, or retiring to spend more time with his Jerusalem Artichokes?
What is the Labour Party going to do in Islington North? How is it going to get a candidate there without a local party to support them?
 
This is a purported transcript that appears to back what Paul Mason said.


The tweet was bad enough but that it seems - at best - to be a serious misrepresentation of what happened, is just :facepalm:

You’re still not being adopted as a Labour candidate, Paul.
 
The tweet was bad enough but that it seems - at best - to be a serious misrepresentation of what happened, is just :facepalm:

You’re still not being adopted as a Labour candidate, Paul.
I dunno; all of the valid points of criticism made by the audience member could have been levelled without claiming that Starmer has Israeli sponsors and donors or that Starmer’s party is an Israeli body. Those claims are a gift to a party loyalist ( arse- licker) like Mason, allowing him to froth and fulminate without addressing the salient point about the party’s abandonment of the working class.

Of course the precise words used and their context is important in interactions like this, but claims that, at best, tiptoe around antisemitic tropes, allow folk like Mason to misrepresent, avoid and deflect. Not smart politicking from the left Labour activist IMO.
 
I dunno; all of the valid points of criticism made by the audience member could have been levelled without claiming that Starmer has Israeli sponsors and donors or that Starmer’s party is an Israeli body. Those claims are a gift to a party loyalist ( arse- licker) like Mason, allowing him to froth and fulminate without addressing the salient point about the party’s abandonment of the working class.

Of course the precise words used and their context is important in interactions like this, but claims that, at best, tiptoe around antisemitic tropes, allow folk like Mason to misrepresent, avoid and deflect. Not smart politicking from the left Labour activist IMO.

100%. There’s plenty more of it on Mason’s twitter as well. Easy stuff to demolish, some of it highly dubious and obscures the real questions he should face on both Gaza and the Labour Party.
 
Back
Top Bottom