Aye. I’ll talk about Glasgow, but I’m sure it’s the same everywhere. One of the things you notice is that every time there’s something on - demo in George Square, picket of the Home Office in Brand Street, A to B march, and so on - it’s the same faces, the same dwindling organisations. The same banners. It’s all seasoned hacks. No muggles. No outside interest.
For a while I thought the YCL in Glasgow was huge by comparison. Then I realised we were probably seeing pretty much the whole of its UK membership each time they turn up. (Well, I realised it with the help of another poster on this thread).
These events are just speaking to the same people. We turn up. We note how few organisation A has put on the street this time. We wander over to activist B and have a chat. The general public are oblivious. The working class is unaffected.
There is not a working class culture any more of mass May Day picnics, discussing politics in the park. But we’re still using the methods of yesteryear. Even online. In fact, I don’t think taking our presence online has broadened our reach at all. It has improved our ability to communicate with each other, but actually we’ve thrown ourselves into a virtual oubliette, and the outside world has no idea we’re in it or that it even exists.
There are breakthrough moments. The anti immigration raids solidarity. Kenmure Street. The new wave of strikes, for which general solidarity seems pretty good. In a small way, the Bookfair I helped organise was actually pretty good at bringing in new faces. But it was hardly a mass movement.
The things that have most impact are the quieter things we tend to get involved in. Individual solidarity work to assist a particular neighbour. Anti library closure campaigning. Networking in one’s community. Community mutual aid WhatsApp groups. Dealing with anti social behaviour. But these don’t tend to see the light of day.