TopCat
Putin fanboy
Who told her?I don't get invited to things all the time, I'm not sure I'd class it as a punishment. And her book's not banned, either. In fact the sum total of what she's been told she can't do is sit behind a table.
Who told her?I don't get invited to things all the time, I'm not sure I'd class it as a punishment. And her book's not banned, either. In fact the sum total of what she's been told she can't do is sit behind a table.
I'm sorry that engaging on a discussion forum tires you so. Maybe have a lie down?a) I don't care in the least what you think about my glory
b) I'm not a bookfair organiser so it wouldn't be my glory in any case
c) will you please stop throwing out random interpretations of what people say as though it has any meaning at all? It's very wearing. In fact your entire attitude of continuous attempted hyping of drama levels for something you have no stake in is very wearing. Though I suppose it does provide an example of what I was saying above.
I'll pass on the obvious rejoinder, but will indeed be enjoying the rest of my evening away from the thread. Ciao.I'm sorry that engaging on a discussion forum tires you so. Maybe have lie down?
Have a good one.I'll pass on the obvious rejoinder, but will indeed be enjoying the rest of my evening away from the thread. Ciao.
That shows a good spiritHave a good one.
Open the booksSome transparency is needed.
Open the books
And there was me thinking no ones going to get the subtle double meaning in that postDon't break the spine though, or you'll have to buy it.
I don't think I am an anarchist anymore if you can still be one and work for the Russian State and a two right wing media companies by choice.
For the first time ever I agree with the young whippersnappers of the new bookfair.
ETA - that's if she still calls herself one. She did last time I 'spoke' to her about working for RT
Not sure if purity is necessary, but I guess we would all draw a line somewhere. Not giving stalls to people who write for Spiked seems a reasonable enough place to draw one to me.
Only very online politics nerds even know Spiked exists, which is why it's only them objecting to it. So what though - it doesn't make it any less the propaganda arm of a deeply sinister far-right political project. And Mckenzie isn't thick, she knows who they are.
You're welcome to give the person writing for the far right propaganda website the benefit of the doubt if you like. Others choose not to, and I can understand them taking that position. Not sure if I would, but as I said - everyone has to draw a line somewhere, and on balance I think I'd rather give the benefit of the doubt to the people telling the person who writes for the far right website to do one than the person who writes for the far right website.I imagine she’s just trying to sell her writings to whoever is offering money. And most of us are in this predicament tbh. The difference with McKenzie is that all her dealings are on public record.
Are Spiked 'far right' then? Can you point to as to why. And then can you relate back why you think the articles of hers on there help promote the far right?You're welcome to give the person writing for the far right propaganda website the benefit of the doubt if you like. Others choose not to, and I can understand them taking that position. Not sure if I would, but as I said - everyone has to draw a line somewhere, and on balance I think I'd rather give the benefit of the doubt to the people telling the person who writes for the far right website to do one than the person who writes for the far right website.
absolutely they are - the political movement of the living marxism network over the last few decades is well documented elsewhere - the thread Danny linked to above is a good place to start, and an interesting read if lengthy. I've not really got the inclination to precis it for you though. As for what a left wing writer writing for a website which among other things tries to function as a pipeline between disaffected left wingers and the populist far right does to help promote their cause? Does it really need spelling out?
Given all manner of people are called fascists nowadays for all manner of reasons I'd rather put my trust in those with a historical understanding of it.View attachment 332320
Proven antifascists have never noted the scabrous pro-capital, far right-adjacent politics of the LM grifters, you say?
I assume you refer to some dear departed? Maybe I should read the 37 page thread.If only someone who was involved in the RCP milieu in the early 1990s was here and able to explain how even then the organising cadres were actively contemptuous of anti-fascism and anti-fascists Or how they actively and with forethought aligned themselves to far-right Slavic conservative nationalist movements under cover of 'anti-imperialism', to the point of denying war crimes.